Two pics from Oilantaytambo that 100% defy evolution

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Yeah I think they do and I've laid out why!
So don't start that crap again!

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: TzarChasm

Um G, maybe it has to do with the fact that I know better!

Are you sure you understand the difference betwen the two?

I want to know?

That's an ignorant question.

first, stop the condescending attitude. you posted the damn thread so dont blame me if i want to ask a few questions. jesus needs some new PR staff, fo real.

second, you know better than what? than to question evolution?

a reply to: TzarChasm

You figure it out?

Stop?



In your final hours, I will stand, ready to begin.

a reply to: randyvs

It doesn't matter what you think, hand carved rocks don't defy evolution. Heck NO rock no matter what its origins or what was done to it defies evolution since evolution doesn't have anything to do with rock formation. So it matters little the reasons why you believe it is so, you are wrong.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Ha, So much for hand carved rocks. You make the claim their
hand carved. you prove that?
Or

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Ha, So much for hand carved rocks. You make the claim their
hand carved. you prove that?
Or

Again it doesn't matter if they are hand carved or not. Rocks no matter their origins don't defy evolution. They aren't organic so they have nothing to do with evolution. So I really could care less if they are hand carved or not as it pertains to this discussion.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Again I've already laid out how it pertains to this discusion.
Quit going in circles.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Again I've already laid out how it pertains to this discusion.
Quit going in circles.

Yes, I know and it is just as big a stretch as the OP. I had really hoped that after 28 pages of discussion, you'd have realized that this thread was a huge fail and we were all just talking in this thread for no reason. I didn't realize you still firmly believe that the OP is proof of anything. I mean how much explanation do you need for you to admit when you are wrong?

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Obviouysly more than you can provide!
How's it feel BTW?

a reply to: randyvs

How does what feel? Talking to someone who cannot accept reality and continues to argue a strawman like it means anything? To that I say, just like any other day on ATS talking to christian fundamentalists. I had just hoped that in this case you'd realized that you erred. I mean at least MOST Christian strawmans trying to disprove evolution (or defy it as per your thread title) talk about organisms and species. Your strawman literally has ZERO to do with evolution and how it works. Guess I expected too much from you randy.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Obviouysly more than you can provide!
How's it feel BTW?

so as long as you ignore the giant red F on your homework, you can pretend it's an A, right? that's what i'm seeing here.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Straw man BS my ass.
All your arguments are just a matter of opinion period,

a reply to: randyvs

It is a straw man as has been shown to you time and again. But I tell you what. How about YOU find a source that can shown that evolution has anything to do with rock formation 10,000 or so years ago.

A matter of opinion? WHAT THE HELL? My statements are matters of FACT. Evolution has ZERO to do with rock formation. Why can you not admit that and keep insisting that it is the other way around?

a reply to: Krazysh0t

10,000 or so years ago.

I would never pretend to be so on the money.

And we're not talking about rock formations Einstien!

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Straw man BS my ass.
All your arguments are just a matter of opinion period,

is that the best youve got?

a reply to: randyvs

I'm not pretending to be on the money either that's why I put the phrase "or so" behind the number 10,000. Again, I really don't care what the date of that rock is. Unless you can somehow show that the rock was carved millions of years ago, then it isn't evidence of evolution being defied. And even then it wouldn't necessarily be a conflict since the rock could have been carved by aliens (but that is jumping to whole other topics). The only thing you MAY have called into question with your thread is the mainstream account of when human civilization started, and you know, this thread would have been SOOO much better if you had gone down that line of inquiry instead of the evolution angle. Evolution has NOTHING to do with this topic no matter how much you want it to.

originally posted by: randyvs
IF Oilantaytambo dates back to at least 12,000 yrs. And
as we don't even understand in this day of technology
how the mountainside was carved of blocks. I think we can
easily ( more than many would like to ) assess that these
blocks were carved out of this mountainside, before the flood.

The flood that sheared of the top of the rock hillside. Whereby
the rest of the two rectangular block chasms were once intact.
And the machinery that carved those squares in granite was
obviously lost to the flood. Bye Bye evolution. Hello every
truth that is the Bible.

The Bible thumpers claim the Earth is only 6000 yrs oid so how does that work with your 12000 years above

a reply to: Krazysh0t


We aren't takl'n about rock formations Einstien.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

this is mr randy's entire argument:

IF Oilantaytambo dates back to at least 12,000 yrs. And
as we don't even understand in this day of technology
how the mountainside was carved of blocks. I think we can
easily ( more than many would like to ) assess that these
blocks were carved out of this mountainside, before the flood.

The flood that sheared of the top of the rock hillside. Whereby
the rest of the two rectangular block chasms were once intact.
And the machinery that carved those squares in granite was
obviously lost to the flood. Bye Bye evolution. Hello every
truth that is the Bible.

a reply to: wmd_2008

Thanks for quoting my point.