It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
On the main topic of Dr Wood, I really don't know if I agree with all of her findings and conclusions, but I think she's come across evidence and data which has helped bring some questions about what happened in lower Manhattan to light.
originally posted by: _BoneZ_
Originally posted by Curious and Concerned
reply to post by seattletruth
Just curious. Do you have any sources for that information? Not doubting you, just willing to look into it.
Seattletruth is from a different disinfo cult known as the no-planers. He and the cult he follows believes the images and videos of 9/11 were fake, the victims were fake, the buildings were fake, everything was fake. That's why he rants about images being "proven" to be fake on her website.
The crackpot theories like "no-planes, pods, energy weapons, holograms", etc., all have been looked at by many of us many years ago, found there to be no truth to any of them, and deemed them disinfo.
The no-planers actually create the disinfo they peddle, so they're otherwise known as disinfo artists. Several of them have grievances with the 9/11 truth movement, so that is the likely reason they create the disinfo and try to pass it off as "9/11 truth" to make the movement look bad.
What it boils down to is that not a single legitimate research organization in the 9/11 truth movement supports any of these crackpot disinfo theories. Not Scholars, Pilots, Architects and Engineers, Lawyers, Firefigters, 9/11 Blogger, Loose Change, you name it. Nobody supports these fringe theories.
This DEW/energy weapon disinfo and the no-plane disinfo are the major reasons why Scholars for 9/11 truth split into two separate research organizations. One became a disinfo organization believing in the disinfo above, the other half "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice" became the legitimate organization and where the real researchers went and have a continually updated Journal of 9/11 Studies.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
a reply to: ThichHeaded
Shot down is a cover. Flight 93 did not crash in Shanksville, the crater has been proven to not have been caused by a large commercial airliner.
Just as a mind game, has anyone figured out, or computerized, what it would have looked like and the damage done if one or both towers collapsed sideways? Maybe a computer graphic that could show them collapsing in any direction or combination of directions.
originally posted by: BobAthome
"Rumors and fact, fact and rumors.. Which is it? "
Rumors and fact, fact and rumors.. Which is it?
When it comes to 9/11 this is your rule of them..
If you can prove it without a shadow of a doubt then.. It is possibly probable..