It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What happens when you take a 2.4-meter telescope, launch it into space, and command it to stare at one spot in the sky for a solid 14 hours, taking data both in visible light (like our eyes see) and infrared?
What you’re seeing here is a view of thousands of galaxies. Thousands. Sure, there are some stars in our own Milky Way punctuating this picture here and there but they are few, and just stomped flat by the number of whole galaxies you’re seeing.
And just in case I have not yet crushed your puny human mind, this image represents a tiny fraction of the entire sky; perhaps only one ten-millionth of it. That means there are hundreds of billions of galaxies like these scattered throughout the Universe.
originally posted by: Snarl
a reply to: teamcommander
I wonder what that picture will look like taken a hundred years from now.
originally posted by: teamcommander
originally posted by: Snarl
a reply to: teamcommander
I wonder what that picture will look like taken a hundred years from now.
A hundred years is less than the blink of an eye in real universal time.
The perspective won't even change very much by then.
I'd wager the resolution improves by a factor of a thousand. I'd wager we'd be seeing objects well beyond the accepted 13.8B LY limit.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Snarl
I'd wager the resolution improves by a factor of a thousand. I'd wager we'd be seeing objects well beyond the accepted 13.8B LY limit.
No, because the light will not have had time to reach us yet. It is tantalizing, isn't it: we know that there is an entire universe beyond the "time horizon" in all directions, but we will never be able to see it!
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Snarl
I'd wager the resolution improves by a factor of a thousand. I'd wager we'd be seeing objects well beyond the accepted 13.8B LY limit.
No, because the light will not have had time to reach us yet. It is tantalizing, isn't it: we know that there is an entire universe beyond the "time horizon" in all directions, but we will never be able to see it!
originally posted by: Snarl
originally posted by: teamcommander
originally posted by: Snarl
a reply to: teamcommander
I wonder what that picture will look like taken a hundred years from now.
A hundred years is less than the blink of an eye in real universal time.
The perspective won't even change very much by then.
I'd wager the resolution improves by a factor of a thousand. I'd wager we'd be seeing objects well beyond the accepted 13.8B LY limit.