It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why would they be interested anyway, unless it is to simply provoke someone?
originally posted by: whyamIhere
a reply to: WarminIndy
Why would they be interested anyway, unless it is to simply provoke someone?
I certainly didn't try to provoke anyone.
I am genuinely curious how people think about this issue.
Sorry if you took it that way. I know this is a sensitive subject for some.
originally posted by: WarminIndy
originally posted by: whyamIhere
a reply to: WarminIndy
Why would they be interested anyway, unless it is to simply provoke someone?
I certainly didn't try to provoke anyone.
I am genuinely curious how people think about this issue.
Sorry if you took it that way. I know this is a sensitive subject for some.
I wasn't referring to you specifically, sorry if you thought I was.
But don't you think it's fair that given our Constitutional right to have freedom of religious expression that in this forum on ATS, that we should be allowed to express our religious ideas?
ATS is comfortable enough to allow us that right. But generally counter arguments are the first thing that happens. Some people think they are so bright that they automatically say things already found in this thread. If they have the idea that religion was formed to control the masses then they should create their own threads and then atheists can go there and bash all they want, but they don't they wait for a thread and then bash Christians on that.
There should be an anti-religious forum if that is all they want to do.
originally posted by: oneoneone
originally posted by: WarminIndy
originally posted by: whyamIhere
a reply to: WarminIndy
Why would they be interested anyway, unless it is to simply provoke someone?
I certainly didn't try to provoke anyone.
I am genuinely curious how people think about this issue.
Sorry if you took it that way. I know this is a sensitive subject for some.
I wasn't referring to you specifically, sorry if you thought I was.
But don't you think it's fair that given our Constitutional right to have freedom of religious expression that in this forum on ATS, that we should be allowed to express our religious ideas?
ATS is comfortable enough to allow us that right. But generally counter arguments are the first thing that happens. Some people think they are so bright that they automatically say things already found in this thread. If they have the idea that religion was formed to control the masses then they should create their own threads and then atheists can go there and bash all they want, but they don't they wait for a thread and then bash Christians on that.
There should be an anti-religious forum if that is all they want to do.
Why divide and separate if you can become one?
There is only one most efficient mechanism, except that in specific situations specific specializations or illusions might mean more fun if you don't have the time to see beyond!
Tho certain people being kept away might be useful to research something specific, indeed.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Of course they should be allowed to, the better question is why shouldn't they?
Should a non-smoker not be able to debate the effects of smoking since they don't smoke?
originally posted by: WarminIndy
originally posted by: oneoneone
originally posted by: WarminIndy
originally posted by: whyamIhere
a reply to: WarminIndy
Why would they be interested anyway, unless it is to simply provoke someone?
I certainly didn't try to provoke anyone.
I am genuinely curious how people think about this issue.
Sorry if you took it that way. I know this is a sensitive subject for some.
I wasn't referring to you specifically, sorry if you thought I was.
But don't you think it's fair that given our Constitutional right to have freedom of religious expression that in this forum on ATS, that we should be allowed to express our religious ideas?
ATS is comfortable enough to allow us that right. But generally counter arguments are the first thing that happens. Some people think they are so bright that they automatically say things already found in this thread. If they have the idea that religion was formed to control the masses then they should create their own threads and then atheists can go there and bash all they want, but they don't they wait for a thread and then bash Christians on that.
There should be an anti-religious forum if that is all they want to do.
Why divide and separate if you can become one?
There is only one most efficient mechanism, except that in specific situations specific specializations or illusions might mean more fun if you don't have the time to see beyond!
Tho certain people being kept away might be useful to research something specific, indeed.
Become one what?
Are you asking us to accept your worldview? And then you can't see why your statement has just become divisive?
originally posted by: whyamIhere
If somebody was discussing the existence of Santa Claus...I would just move on.
Do you think people of faith are uneducated or just dumb?
Does it bother you that people of faith seem to be happy and blissful?
Do you feel you are educating people who have been indoctrinated?
Some of you seem to believe in UFO's. Doesn't that require faith?
Atheism is on the rise. Have people just lost their faith?
Would you be willing to admit you have no proof whether God exists or not?
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: WarminIndy
I didn't realize I was saying you weren't allowed to debate abortion.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: WarminIndy
Both sides are decried actually, that's why it's called a debate.
Sure it belongs in the religious forum, it's mostly a religious and/or ethical issue, so I'd say it fits the glove. This is off-topic though.