Bundy supporters strategy: place women out the front

reply to post by AlphaHawk


It's diversionary in the essence that you've taken government-sponsored bait leading us away from the fact they just threatened to shoot American civilians and militia and take our land by force.

AlphaHawk
reply to post by xuenchen

 

Helleva bluff don't you think?

Especially when he says himself that he believes they would have opened fire.

So now you're in a conundrum, the evil government, known for murdering women and children before...backs down when faced with doing it again.

Wait what?

Seems like you're just as confused as he is.

So what is it?

Mindless women killers?
Or gutless beurocrats backing down so women don't get killed?

edit on 15-4-2014 by AlphaHawk because: (no reason given)

OF *Course* he "says" that he *Believes* they would open fire !!!!!

Brilliant psy-ops.

All part of the "act" and "scene".

and you ask "So what is it?"

The Feds got the Orduhz from higher up because the politicians reminded them it's an election year !!!!

And Harry Reid's exposures didn't help the politicians either ...

THAT's "what is it".

reply to post by Davian


Honestly I think he can care less.. He is just talking the same garbage.. He aint even from the US.. He thinks we are all a bunch of barbarians so fine we are.. he can think what he wants because his opinion matters to me as mostly everyone elses...

In essence he be trollin.. or he really believes the garbage he is spewing.. either way..

reply to post by ThichHeaded


He's not even from the US? I feel like a complete and utter moron now, I apologize for my ignorant behavior, I should've considered this. I've now just proven I'm an inconsiderate dickhead and will refrain from replying. Again, apologies, I should have been more understanding. -.-

reply to post by AlphaHawk

Equal rights mean men and women on the front line, side by side.

no it doesn't, it means the right to do the same as men. ie vote just like men , drink, just like men, smoke just like men, and i dare say to stand up front just like men. by themselves or with men standing side by side. look up the equal rights movement and see what the people that fought for them wanted. they wanted to be able to the freedoms as men.not just with them.

plain and simple would have it not been fair if he asked women if they want to stand up front as a shield? which they would have the right to refuse, it is a equal choice, hence a equal right.
not tell them to stand up front. or deny the the opportunity to do so.

I pointed out that they're most likely adults because I'm sure some smart arse would have pointed out that his daughters would most likely be adults. I was just getting in first.

that's easy to say after the fact, when you've been called on it.

I'm not twisting his words at all and you know it.

when you add something to words some one says that is twisting his words. you stated it as if he said that directly and you know it. trying to play people's sentiment and emotions.

and yes sir you are coming across as a chauvinist.

reply to post by ThichHeaded


What garbage is that then?

That I'm all for women taking up arms?

That the governments response was heavy handed?

Because that's where I'm at, all I have a problem with is using women at the front to garner sympathy, to possibly die first.

That's what I got a problem with, if that's garbage, then so be it...but I've got the moral high ground here, that's clear because you're slinging mud now..

You reckon me not being an American is a disadvantage for me!

On the contrary, I haven't been bombarded with your crappy media or your crappy politics, therefore completely impartial to your democratics vs republicans rubbish.

You can't even see it, you think because I disagree with you I'm peddling garbage, when in fact I'm seeing it clear as day without any political or media bias to sway me.

My question is what scenario is most correct?

A) The women formulated the plan and volunteered.

B) Both men and women formulated the plan and the women volunteered.

C) Men formulated the plan and the women volunteered

D) Men formulated the plan and told the women they better do what the men say.

With out knowing this, I can not make an informed judgment.

On the contrary, I haven't been bombarded with your crappy media or your crappy politics, therefore completely impartial to your democratics vs republicans rubbish.

Dude...wtf? Seriously?

calstorm
My question is what scenario is most correct?

A) The women formulated the plan and volunteered.

B) Both men and women formulated the plan and the women volunteered.

C) Men formulated the plan and the women volunteered

D) Men formulated the plan and told the women they better do what the men say.

With out knowing this, I can not make an informed judgment.

well you haven't listened to the ben swann video, he said he came up with it and that there was a women lawyer in the car with him on the way down that said she would have went to the front.

it never played out with the people there because he never made to the site before the face off.

reply to post by hounddoghowlie


I have not heard the video yet. I Just got on ATS moments ago and this was one of the first threads I read.

Edit: Listening now.

reply to post by AlphaHawk


Ya here is the thing, I haven't watched mainstream news in crap.. like 6 yrs.. I turn on local news every once in a while when a storm is about to brew.. I see the garbage..

As for this issue.. you to me your opinion does not matter, cause when the bullets start flying, you will be a half a world away watching it on the news..

As for what this topic is about.. If this plan did fold out and women were shot and killed, They choose on their own to go there and do that.. Nobody put a gun to thier heads to do it..

See we be American.. See We be standing up for things(which I think we should have done along time ago but meh.. Nobody picks the straw that will break the camels back only the camel can..) Apparently We Americans not being as spineless as world be thinking..

I am done commenting to you because you can say all day this guy was wrong for what he stated.. But I am backing him and alot of people where backing him because if he wasn't backed I am sure they would have beat his ass by now..

What I want is this all to go away and things to go back to american idol and football honestly because the other way.. Not so good...

reply to post by AlphaHawk


oh and i saw how you went back and edited out the "no matter the age" out of your post that i quoted.

that just goes to show you how much a lair and disingenuous you are.

someone with Integrity wouldn't have gone back and changed their own words to prove a point. they would have let it stand.




ETA now this is strange it's back in your post, but not showing up in my quote which i know that it was there. so either something funky going on with ATS,or you put it back.

if it's ATS, my apologies.

there was a women lawyer in the car with him on the way down that said she would have went to the front.

Aight so it was a woman who sparked the idea, and he probably expanded upon the idea from there.

reply to post by Davian


NO NO EVIL MAN PUT GUN TO HEAD MAKE WOMEN GOTO FRONT!!! OLGA OLGA!!

::EDIT::
Couldnt resist..

reply to post by AlphaHawk


Even if this lie were true? I don't believe the coward ass federalis would
hesitate to gun them right on down.

The Feds are just a pack of sissy ass la las with weapons.
And there isn't anything worse that could be turn loose
on a nation.

BIG MEN ! Every one watch out for pudgy boy! They make me vomit.

reply to post by randyvs


Another confused one.

Which is it?

Mindless killers, who would shoot down women without hesitation?
Or gutless wimps, who back down as soon as they put a few women in front of them?

Can't have both, yet you seem to think you can?

reply to post by hounddoghowlie


Why would I edit it? I know what I meant even if you don't.

And why is everyone gunning for me for speaking up?

You're ok to use women as cannon fodder? Even if they volunteered for it?

I'm not and I get personally attacked for saying so.

I haven't been rude or off topic to anyone, despite it getting heated, why can't others do the same?

reply to post by AlphaHawk

Mindless killers, who would shoot down women without hesitation?
Or gutless wimps, who back down as soon as they put a few women in front of them?

Then I'll take gutless wimps who would shoot down women or burn children.
Nice choice. And you seem to be the confusion.

reply to post by randyvs


So why didn't they do it then?

reply to post by randyvs


i didn't think this bunch of feds was going after children THIS TIME...
not enough tanks with flame throwers...

(ETA ooops, sorry, my bad...
they were working their way up from helicopter hunting new born calves with sniper rifles... )

maybe thats what Harry Reed ment when he saId " this isn't over..."