It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Dear valued Cirro Energy customer,
We're excited to announce that Cirro Energy is now part of NRG. This is great news for your business because it means you get the best of both worlds. You'll continue to enjoy all the benefits of your Cirro electricity service. Plus, with NRG, you'll also have the peace of mind that comes with a parent company that is the largest competitive power generator in the U.S. and serves more than 1.9 million Texans.
We expect this to be a smooth transition for your business because you'll remain on your current electricity plan through Cirro. As you already know, Cirro provides customers with smart, money-saving plans, online and mobile account management, convenient payment options and local customer service, as well as some of the lowest fixed rates available.
You are now part of an energy family dedicated to bringing innovative, sustainable power to households and businesses nationwide. We're here to help you and look forward to powering - and empowering - your business for years to come.
tinner07
So what exactly does that mean to deregulate electricity providers? Here it is mostly consumers energy. In Lansing they have the board of water and light and have their own power plants.
I guess I have never paid much attention to it, you are saying energy is regulated now? deregulating would mean what? Now I'm sure it could be turned into a very complex answer with pros and cons.
In regards of ma Bell.. was the telephone industry regulated back then? I remember Mi bell and then MCI coming in...is that when it was deregulated?
rickymouse
When they broke up Ma Bell, it only temporarily brought down the cost of phone service. It seems like it did not work as anticipated, with added charges adding up on bills and lessening of services for free. On top of that the government lost revenue from the phone industry for a while, adding special taxes to compensate the loss later on. Bell had a lot of decent paying jobs at the time that stabalized the economies of communities. Small companies had low paying sales jobs at a central location which was not in your hometown.
Sometimes having a big company provide services is good and stress free. Other times it is a curse. It all depends on what type of people run the company, if they are extremely greedy, it is bad for us.edit on 8-4-2014 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)
rickymouse
When they broke up Ma Bell, it only temporarily brought down the cost of phone service. It seems like it did not work as anticipated, with added charges adding up on bills and lessening of services for free. On top of that the government lost revenue from the phone industry for a while, adding special taxes to compensate the loss later on. Bell had a lot of decent paying jobs at the time that stabalized the economies of communities. Small companies had low paying sales jobs at a central location which was not in your hometown.
Sometimes having a big company provide services is good and stress free. Other times it is a curse. It all depends on what type of people run the company, if they are extremely greedy, it is bad for us.edit on 8-4-2014 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)
WhiteAlice
rickymouse
When they broke up Ma Bell, it only temporarily brought down the cost of phone service. It seems like it did not work as anticipated, with added charges adding up on bills and lessening of services for free. On top of that the government lost revenue from the phone industry for a while, adding special taxes to compensate the loss later on. Bell had a lot of decent paying jobs at the time that stabalized the economies of communities. Small companies had low paying sales jobs at a central location which was not in your hometown.
Sometimes having a big company provide services is good and stress free. Other times it is a curse. It all depends on what type of people run the company, if they are extremely greedy, it is bad for us.edit on 8-4-2014 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)
Actually, Ma Bell is a really interesting case. They broke it up due to anti-trust and lack of competition; however, Ma Bell ( aka AT&T these days) was reacquiring or realigning its formerly divested assets soon after. It was broken up in 1956 and 1984. Each time, "baby bells" merged together afterwards and it just basically rebuilt the entire monstrosity.
bigfatfurrytexan
WhiteAlice
rickymouse
When they broke up Ma Bell, it only temporarily brought down the cost of phone service. It seems like it did not work as anticipated, with added charges adding up on bills and lessening of services for free. On top of that the government lost revenue from the phone industry for a while, adding special taxes to compensate the loss later on. Bell had a lot of decent paying jobs at the time that stabalized the economies of communities. Small companies had low paying sales jobs at a central location which was not in your hometown.
Sometimes having a big company provide services is good and stress free. Other times it is a curse. It all depends on what type of people run the company, if they are extremely greedy, it is bad for us.edit on 8-4-2014 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)
Actually, Ma Bell is a really interesting case. They broke it up due to anti-trust and lack of competition; however, Ma Bell ( aka AT&T these days) was reacquiring or realigning its formerly divested assets soon after. It was broken up in 1956 and 1984. Each time, "baby bells" merged together afterwards and it just basically rebuilt the entire monstrosity.
"Mergers and acquisitions". This is how empires are built.
You build a business big enough to maintain a revenue base. You then allow smaller start ups to establish a customer base. You then buy out the smaller start ups, and acquire their customer base.
That is how it works. In any industry. Big fish eat little fish, and become bigger fish.
We are going from a state regulated monopoly, to a completely unregulated monopoly on a national level.