posted on Mar, 10 2014 @ 04:28 PM
Desire to experience pleasure, pleasure in feeling big familiar sure and in control, and emotional attachment to serving others, as motion-directing
internal stimulus, interact with fear, humility, retreat reaction to pain, and depression in losing that which feeds one's heart. Humiliation means
encountering stimulus hostile to one's pride, guilt - hostile to the attachment of one's pride (sorrow intermingled with embarrassment). This
complex information that interacts with it, composes the general and local social interaction politic is intended to serve.
Will - the conscious resultant of the complex's interaction with intellect. Want exists apart from desire, although it is usually determined by
one's overriding desire. It is not necessary to want selfish reward, (to want at all).
f= free will enabled, p= pleasure contributed, s= suffering absolved. The political systems which most meet these real quantities to my mind are
mathematically most justified. i= free will inhibited. If inhibited without inducing suffering or stealing pleasure, example: I telepathically force a
gnome to poke itself in the cheek, and it is unimpacted psychologically: I'm to endure same duration and magnitude of bodily loss of control,
touching my own cheek too. t= suffering inflicted, z= pleasure stolen. The most despotic political systems veer toward I, t, z.
The emotional complex of the populous is most thoroughly deterred by consistent fairness and accuracy assessing the weight of the positive against the
negative culp of the individual. Pride and desire baiting one's attack upon the eye for an eye president, the negatives I,t,z one's awareness
induces out of pride and desire. Negligent means less aware of the interaction than malicious, meaning more of the damage (not conscious of the
interaction) is butterfly.
Philosophical, mathematical, and scientific study of the highest deterrential value of the scales provides best data on regionally best system.
My preferred political path is to attempt to unify lower-middle classes as a co-operative underground ingenious enough to bodyguard their own autonomy
as against the classic total domination of an elite (instinctively loyal to the eccentrics closest to their hearts). Before "the peoples" attempt to
invade, or turn themselves in to, unofficial nobility, the bottom wrung of society should establish its own invisible global standing.
As a Libertarian Anarchist, I would study the military and economic systems most pragmatic toward equipping the social and individual psyches involved
to overcome the need for governance, as well as the intellect to see thru its non deterrentially motivated intrusions. Since love unifies and
selfishness is that which requires deterrential consistency or law, one should lose one's selfish side serving the goals of a good military
Pride requires over-ascertion and hierarchical competition. In its absence, experience relevance is easy to clearly perceive as that which most
efficiently directs infrastructural resources - and effectively.
Right Hand Path Anarchy - the transcendence of pride as the transcendence of politic.
I also believe, when dealing with (for instance) immortal hierarchies, in tactical flexibility transitioning out of outmoded methods of doing things
into a less... and less coercive state.