It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
captaintyinknots
Hows about, rather than cutting benefits, we cut the actual fat from our military budget? You know, the BILLIONS of dollars that they spend? Ya know, the greatest consumer of fossil fuels on the planet? Ya know, the guys who hand out no bid contracts right and left?
Naw....thatd make too much sense...lets just take food out of people's mouths instead....edit on 24-2-2014 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)
And that's OK to you?
That the defense department effectively subsidizes the american middle class and supports basically the entire US economy?
That in itself is one of the prime reasons your nation is turning itself into a third world country from the bottom up.
beezzer
They cut Commissary benefits, they cut HOLA, COLA.
They wanted to make it hurt to the regular soldier and his/her family.
There are thousands of things they could have cut without hurting the men and women who serve.
But they didn't.
they wanted to make this painful, noticeable, and very loud.
Why?
The military NEEDS reduction if you are to save your own country. It's gotten ridiculous.
neo96
Here is the math.
The rest of the world is building up their militaries, and the current administration GUTS ours.
Same thing we saw with Carter, the same thing we saw with Clinton, and now what we see with the current potus.
This can't get any more ridiculous.
Meanwhile the same administration has increased social engineering spending.
The problem I have is WHO is doing the cutting and HOW.
You obviously failed math.
America spends more than the next 25 nations combined none of whom are our enemies.
The money is better spent on the people instead of building weapons that we sell to other nations at scrap prices even though they are still new.
it really hasn't been addressed. The military budget could be cut by 1/3rd and still be the biggest in the world.
neo96
captaintyinknots
Hows about, rather than cutting benefits, we cut the actual fat from our military budget? You know, the BILLIONS of dollars that they spend? Ya know, the greatest consumer of fossil fuels on the planet? Ya know, the guys who hand out no bid contracts right and left?
Naw....thatd make too much sense...lets just take food out of people's mouths instead....edit on 24-2-2014 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)
That has already been addressed.
In the last 6 years military doctrine has been to go 'green'.
Of course they are prolly handing out 'no bid' contracts for them solar panels, and wind turbines, and other nonsense.
That paints a bullseye on the people on the ground.
'Hey look there,' That glare from solar panels that's a target!'.
it really hasn't been addressed. The military budget could be cut by 1/3rd and still be the biggest in the world.
But people like to scream "less government" out of one side of their mouths while defending military spending out of the other.
Just silly. But also not worth the debate....far toomuch hypocrissy involved.
hort sighted stinkin' thinkin'. Very Very short sighted....just no realism to it at all.
We do have a moral obligation to give the military the best money can buy. Rather effing easy to say to slash military spending.
We already have the best military and even if we cut the budget in half we would still have the best military.
Simply because we are the nation that builds the best weapons.
You mean spend tax revenue on the people that can't find jobs because they have been moved overseas? Maybe we shouldn't have had a president that offered tax breaks to them then maybe their jobs would still be here.
neo96
Here is the math.
The rest of the world is building up their militaries, and the current administration GUTS ours.
Same thing we saw with Carter, the same thing we saw with Clinton, and now what we see with the current potus.
This can't get any more ridiculous.
Meanwhile the same administration has increased social engineering spending.
Please explain why the country needs to have the highest military spending by several orders of magnitude, especially considering your stance that we don't have the best military in the world.
Anyways you are wrong
We don't NEED a huge standing army anymore. We need small tactical units to wage small, regional battles
Trust me I was actually IN the army. I was in field artillery and when I went to Iraq, I did MP work.
We DON'T need to spend this much money on the military that sits around and does nothing for large periods of time or does things that they didn't sign up to do.
Maybe if we actually participated in a large land war again, you could have a case for a built up army, but right now it is just a bloat on books. Slash it
Again ex-soldier here, so don't try to tell me I don't know what I'm talking about.