It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
starviego
If he is so guilty, why can't they even come up with the "nuts and bolts" evidence against him?
Eyewitnesses who could ID the shooter as Holmes? No.
Gun Shot Residue evidence collected from his hands and clothing? No.
His fingerprints on anything at all? No.
Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Daedalus
Well, lets see and consider the proof angle. Someone, without any question here, opened fire in the theater
and by the visible evidence, it would seem to be in and out of that back door.
He was out in the parking lot, dazed and confused and easily taken into custody, dressed for the occasion and apparently all worn out.
His apartment was, by all reports and the live coverage, a giant I.E.D. a neighbor nearly tripped and at what would have been a perfect time to draw the whole shift's worth of police over to the other side of town, right before the shooting started. The neighbor didn't, and thus, the drama for a day or two in disarming his apartment.
Now beyond this, I'm not sure about forensics for fingerprints across the cartridges loaded into the weapons or in/out of the weapons from handling for the shooting as well as the last time they were taken down to clean properly. Prints tend to get into the weirdest places and as far as I know, none of that is publicly accessible at this point, either way.
We do know his psych, and it's public record at this point, was raising alarms with the school but communication/privacy issues prevented that from getting out as widely (or at all) to some as it should have. Another strike on him.
His sudden crash and burn at school for leaving at the end of a Doctoral program and so close....yet..there goes basically years of life and maybe enough debt to last a lifetime to show for burger king jobs ..for whatever trigger event caused all that to start with....gives the "how could this possibly happen?". Wound tight in a tough Phd program, he snapped like a bad rubber band. Remember "The Joker" in the jail house photos? He was bat-crap nuts that night when taken into custody and after that daze in the parking lot wore off (Probably shock in what the real thing looked like to do, compared to what his fantasy idea of it was supposed to be, IMO).
Near as I can tell, he's been in La-La land in what could be called 'The Lights are On but No Ones Home', ever since. That first court appearance? Watch a vid and HD one if available. I recall the coverage at the time and he looks like he's openly hallucinating. His eyes are tracking logical lines of movement for things which clearly aren't there in the courtroom, during the proceedings. He just killed xx number of people...yet his lawyer is sitting a couple feet away, apparently unconcerned about what he's doing, and with no guards close enough to get to her before he could have .....except ..no one home. I think they medicated this kid 6 ways from Sunday starting before that 1st appearance and possibly non-stop since. I'm curious if he actually did go insane or not. I think it's possible.
spirited75
this is a old ploy/plot.
dupe/patsy= oswald, holmes, lanza, _______.
technicians who do the actual work.
official government story=one shooter
strange behaviors about investigation.
include boston bombing.
DarksideOz
spirited75
this is a old ploy/plot.
dupe/patsy= oswald, holmes, lanza, _______.
technicians who do the actual work.
official government story=one shooter
strange behaviors about investigation.
include boston bombing.
Nice connection to Boston. About a month or so ago I saw a video that showed 3 police officers that attended the "scene" at Sandyhook, also caught on film at the Boston bombing "scene". They were all wearing black ops clothing. What are the chances of 3 'police officers' attending the school shooting in one place, then appearing at the scene of the Boston bombing all wearing black ops type clothing ?
Find out who those 3 guys are, and you'll blow both official stories out of the window once and for all. My bet is those 3 guys were the real gunmen at Sandyhook, and more than likely behind the planting and detonating of the bombs in Boston. How else does one logically explain them being at both scenes despite the distance and no connection between the 2 scenes. That is NOT a coincidence.
DarksideOz
reply to post by Daedalus
My apologies for drifting away from the topic, but I believe there is the same, or very similar footprints with the James Holmes case, the Adam Lanza case, and the Boston Bombings. The Port Arthur shootings in Australia which led to our gun laws also has the same, or very similar footprints. They all have huge holes in their 'official' story. They all have a patsy to pin it on, and they were all used to either push the agenda of gun control or 'terrorism'.
As for the video i saw, I will genuinely try and find it for you. I think it may of even been on Youtube but I can't confirm it. Something keeps telling me that it was a video from Mark Howitt if that helps ?
Give me a few days and hopefully I can put up a link to it.