It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 1ofthe9
Did you catch the MILAB type stuff too?
originally posted by: Baddogma
I am having second thoughts about joining that "research thread" as screening negative input defeats the process of deciding relative truth... and for other reasons as well, tbh.
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear
I am having second thoughts about joining that "research thread" as screening negative input defeats the process of deciding relative truth... and for other reasons as well, tbh.
originally posted by: cuckooold
...Are we still stuck in the same picture theatre watching a remastered copy of the same old film, or is this movie a new release? There is a variation in the plot - this time there are no aliens, it's all Earthly tech. Why the change in the script?
Does this mean I need to change my belief system?
Again?
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
Just from first glance as I haven't given it any attention other than seeing the OP, but if those already listed as participants are in fact active participants than I fail to see how this "research" would be without bias. There seems to be a little issue of conflict of interest IMHO and trying to wade in to that knowing you will have to deal with egos and pride while attempting to extract whatever truth that lives inside this # sandwhich. To me, that is awfully unappealing.
originally posted by: CirqueDeTruth
...If Astr0 was still here, I'd leap right in. But I waited, and missed my chance to be involved when the originators were laying the groundwork. Of course, he'd of had to walk away, if this was all manipulation of his expertise, and a serpo event. Can't be around for the "research" and have the story contradicted or fall apart before it gets it converts. Easier to have an absentee with a story they are working to validate, eh?
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: Rosinitiate
Exactly rose... exactly.
As cuckoold (I do NOT want to know the origin of that net handle) pointed out, this info is different in tone and scope and thus, perhaps, motives IF disinfo or a psi-ops.
And I didn't know there WAS a lethal dose of lysergic acid ... poor elephant... I vaguley remember that and will now "relax" by looking it up.
And as an aside, despite my urbane demeanor (ha), my youth held a few years spent trying to ascertain such a lethal dose, and failed. The only 'death' was of any personal assurance that the concept of a consensus reality was even possible!
And GUT, the virtual hug was well received and brought a smile to this haggard, unshaven (yet still comely) demeanor. Hugs back to all.
originally posted by: CirqueDeTruth
I'll be following the developments though. I suppose if I want to talk about it on the live radio show, I should make a contribution of interest? There has been complaints as of late that those of us that do the ATS radio shows will cover a thread we never took part of. Which is difficult for me when I have nothing new or good to add. I don't wear the skeptics hat very well. I'm inclined to believe people, at least believe, they believe it. So I'm conflicted as to whether or not I NEED to become involved on the topic - if I want to cover the theory and account on Into The Fringe Radio.
Sigh.
~ Cirque
originally posted by: cuckooold
Why would people need to sneak around if they had the interests of humanity first and foremost?