It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON, Jan 11 2014 (IPS) - If people outside the United States are looking for answers why Americans often seem so clueless about the world outside their borders, they could start with what the three major U.S. television networks offered their viewers in the way of news during 2013.
PRINCETON, NJ -- Television is the main place Americans say they turn to for news about current events (55%), leading the Internet, at 21%. Nine percent say newspapers or other print publications are their main news source, followed by radio, at 6%.
2013 marks the year when ABC World News finally rejected the mission of presenting a serious newscast. ABC covered all four of the major domestic policy stories least heavily: the Budget debate, the Healthcare rollout, Gun control, and National Security Agency surveillance. Same with foreign policy: ABC spent least time on the civil war in Syria and its chemical weapons disarmament, the military coup in Egypt, and on Afghanistan.
Instead, ABC stepped up its coverage of Sports and Show Business, and highlighted morning-style reporters Ginger Zee (weather) and Paula Faris (personal finance tips).
As for the Israel-Palestinian conflict which Secretary of State John Kerry has made a top priority along with a nuclear deal with Iran, it received only 16 minutes of coverage in 2013. “Palestine has virtually disappeared from the news agenda,” noted Tyndall.
rickymouse
Hey, don't be cutting down the news. Without it I wouldn't have enough entertainment in my life. I like to analyze what the real reason is that they are broadcasting all the crap. It makes me feel like Sherlock Holmes or mostly Charley Chan. Charley Chan was in comedies and what is being told to us is sometimes comical.
I for one think that's been the plan all along.
rickymouse
Hey, don't be cutting down the news. Without it I wouldn't have enough entertainment in my life. I like to analyze what the real reason is that they are broadcasting all the crap. It makes me feel like Sherlock Holmes or mostly Charley Chan. Charley Chan was in comedies and what is being told to us is sometimes comical.
The question is....why is Snowden and Assange portrayed as the enemy? and yet the information they are expressing is suppressed and the average American citizen simply can not even articulate why the TV labels them "traitors"
In my opinion, this dumbing down is directly proportional to the US international power grab.
Bassago
reply to post by Sublimecraft
The question is....why is Snowden and Assange portrayed as the enemy? and yet the information they are expressing is suppressed and the average American citizen simply can not even articulate why the TV labels them "traitors"
In my opinion, this dumbing down is directly proportional to the US international power grab.
Snowden and Assange are considered traitors because they've exposed TPTB in the US for what they really are, evil power hungry imperialists with a wicked bent for fascism. IMO Snowden is probably the greatest hero the US has seen for decades.
As far as the international power grab you may be right. Pretty hard for people to protest when they don't know what's going on. Which brings up the Syria debacle, how did it get so much coverage as to rouse Americans against invading it? I wonder who exactly was behind that bit of media manipulation?
That's bad journalism, but it got us into Iraq, and luckily the lesson was learned enough that the media started to question the source in regards to Syria, and thankfully that "intervention" was averted.
Mamatus
reply to post by webedoomed
Smart people DVR everything and get their news from the internet. Dumb people don't so why cater to those that are no longer in your market.
I know a (and dislike) a family that only watches Fox News.
If you ask them;