It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
destrbndapeace
Apparently 2 nuclear-level explosions noted at the facility on Dec. 31st.
jrod
reply to post by Alekto
To say that Fukushima Diachi did not have a meltdown is extremely ignorant.
destrbndapeace
reply to post by Alekto
" According to this report, MoD “assests” associated with the Red Banner Pacific Fleet detected two “low-level” underground atomic explosions occurring in the Fukushima disaster zone on 31 December, the first measuring 5.1 magnitude in intensity, followed by a smaller 3.6 magnitude explosion moments later."
Underground* explosions. Correction.edit on 3-1-2014 by destrbndapeace because: (no reason given)
Vasa Croe
destrbndapeace
reply to post by Alekto
" According to this report, MoD “assests” associated with the Red Banner Pacific Fleet detected two “low-level” underground atomic explosions occurring in the Fukushima disaster zone on 31 December, the first measuring 5.1 magnitude in intensity, followed by a smaller 3.6 magnitude explosion moments later."
Underground* explosions. Correction.edit on 3-1-2014 by destrbndapeace because: (no reason given)
This is from Sorcha Faal....and as usual is FAIL. It comes directly from the whatdoesitmean website.
Alekto
Vasa Croe
destrbndapeace
reply to post by Alekto
" According to this report, MoD “assests” associated with the Red Banner Pacific Fleet detected two “low-level” underground atomic explosions occurring in the Fukushima disaster zone on 31 December, the first measuring 5.1 magnitude in intensity, followed by a smaller 3.6 magnitude explosion moments later."
Underground* explosions. Correction.edit on 3-1-2014 by destrbndapeace because: (no reason given)
This is from Sorcha Faal....and as usual is FAIL. It comes directly from the whatdoesitmean website.
Duly noted. Did eutimes.net lift the story from there or vice versa?
Vasa Croe
reply to post by Alekto
Well...the steam was definitely happening and reported on by real news agencies. The explosions are completely fabricated and even Sorcha's story links to the EQ's that they are using to say they are nuclear explosions but were some 80 km away from the plant.
jrod
reply to post by Alekto
Still does not change the fact that there were at least 2 total meltdowns.
jrod
reply to post by Alekto
So if the plants did not meltdown, what happened?
Alekto
Vasa Croe
reply to post by Alekto
Well...the steam was definitely happening and reported on by real news agencies. The explosions are completely fabricated and even Sorcha's story links to the EQ's that they are using to say they are nuclear explosions but were some 80 km away from the plant.
No doubt there's some concern over the steam. I did doubt the veracity of the eq's though. I had a quiet NYE, I have an 18 month old and no partying for me. I went to bed reasonably early and I usually leap like the proverbial salmon at the merest hint of an eq. Just out of curiousity, is there any mention of when it was supposed to have happened?
Two shallow earthquakes have struck eastern Japan near the Fukushima nuclear disaster site.
A 5.1 magnitude earthquake was recorded 80km southwest of Fukushima and was shortly followed by a 3.6 magnitude earthquake in the same area, the Japan Meteorological Agency said.
The tremor was 9.9km deep, the US Geological Survey said, adding it took place 13km North West of Takahagi.
There were no reports of any damage but it was strong enough to shake high-rise buildings in the capital, AFP reported.
UPI also said that part of the Joban Expressway was briefly closed to undertake safety checks. The earthquake was felt in Miyagi, Fukushima and Tokyo.
Tokyo Electric Power, which is involved in the Fukushima clean-up, said the earthquake had not affected the Fukushima plant, where crews are currently working to remove radioactive waste spilled during the 2011 Tohoku earthquake.