It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(NaturalNews) As if the millions of Americans set to lose their existing health insurance coverage as a result of Obamacare was not bad enough, a recent survey by Watchdog.org has found that many top hospitals across the nation will no longer be accessible to the average person with a new "eligible" plan. In fact, many major hospitals are being excluded from Obamacare coverage altogether, which means that millions of previously covered individuals will have to settle for subpar care at other "in-network" facilities.
Based on the results of the survey, most of the nation's top hospitals, including renowned facilities like Case Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio, will only be accepting insurance from one or two companies included as part of Obamacare. This means that all the other insurance plans offered on the Obamacare exchanges will be ineligible, and many patients will be required to go to other facilities, even if their previous insurance plans were accepted by these same hospitals.
...
benrl
The more I read the more this seems like a purposeful clusterF*&(
Like they want this to fail so badly we all cry for single payer...
Obamacare exchanges fail to explain which hospitals are included as 'in-network'
ElectricUniverse
This is yet another "surprise", which really wasn't a surprise to some of us, from the new changes being made by the so loved Obamacare healthcare.
It seems that now many major hospitals are not accessible "by the average person in the United States" under the new healthcare plans.
(NaturalNews) As if the millions of Americans set to lose their existing health insurance coverage as a result of Obamacare was not bad enough, a recent survey by Watchdog.org has found that many top hospitals across the nation will no longer be accessible to the average person with a new "eligible" plan. In fact, many major hospitals are being excluded from Obamacare coverage altogether, which means that millions of previously covered individuals will have to settle for subpar care at other "in-network" facilities.
Based on the results of the survey, most of the nation's top hospitals, including renowned facilities like Case Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio, will only be accepting insurance from one or two companies included as part of Obamacare. This means that all the other insurance plans offered on the Obamacare exchanges will be ineligible, and many patients will be required to go to other facilities, even if their previous insurance plans were accepted by these same hospitals.
...
www.naturalnews.com...#
This is similar on how "socialized healthcare" is set up in countries like Cuba, despite the lies from Michael Moore. In those healthcare systems, like in Cuba and now apparently in the U.S., the average person cannot go to the best hospitals as they are reserved for the "top brass" and for rich tourists.
Many Americans, and other people around the world, in ignorance have been cheering for the socialized healthcare in countries like Cuba, and now because of that ignorance most Americans will experience part of what such "wonderful socialized healthcare" is like.
Now, lets hope that because of the spending cuts that hospitals will have to make thanks to Obamacare, that Americans don't have to experience also a lack of necessary items that most hospitals normally had before this whole fiasco. But, I am going to be bold here and make a prediction... We are going to start seeing slowly but surely that hospitals will not be stocking enough necessary items to treat patients thanks to Obamacare...
Hey, many Americans wanted this.
xuenchen
Obamacare exchanges fail to explain which hospitals are included as 'in-network'
Looks like standard operating procedures are set up for the Left Wing/Corporatist agenda.
Now people will have to pay "Extra" or full cash prices for services out of the "Networks"....
Especially IF *YOUR* doctor is no longer networked !!
Where was PPACA on this issue anyway ?
Granite
reply to post by theantediluvian
"...mandated by state law to take them all."
Got a source?
1 Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore
All insurance companies due to state law
2 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
All insurance companies due to state law
theantediluvian
I'm sorry, when did conservatives become so anti-establishment?
theantediluvian
When did conservatives stop being so concerned with corporate interests? Seems like since Reagan, the conservative stance on the economy has centered around the following:
xuenchen
reply to post by theantediluvian
So,
You say the PPACA and all the regulations coming from it are not examples of Lobbyist driven corporatism ?
And not a result of Left Wing politicians who passed the law and are generating the regulations ?
And out of curiosity, what is your definition of "Right Wing" and "Conservative" ?
ElectricUniverse
reply to post by theantediluvian
Yes, the fact that Obamacare is making it so that most regular people will not be able to access major hospitals does make it similar to the healthcare in Cuba, and for your information, there are so called "privitized' hospitals in Cuba as well... Those hospitals fall under the so called "privitised" system that leftwingers love to claim "is the reason for all the evils in the world" because even when the government owns and controls those hospitals claiming it is for the workers, those hospitals are not accessible to regular Cubans.
Those "government privitised hospitals" are the ones that us, the regular Cubans could/can not get into, but the top brass in Cuba, and rich tourists could have access to those hospitals which are always full stocked and with the best equipment available.
The fact that Obamacare will/is making it so that many major hospitals will not be accessible to regular Americans makes it a similar healthcare to that of Cuba.
I hear a lot the word "privatized" when it has nothing to do with the right to private property. Fascist and socialist corporatists alongside governments are using the word "privatize" when it is nothing more than corporatist takeover.
I have to wonder why in the world so many leftwingers believe that "socialists and other leftwingers do not work for profit, and are not corporatist in nature" when there are so many examples of the contrary...
Nowadays many leftwingers try to use corporatist takeovers as examples of "the evil of the right to private property" when they have nothing in common... This is similar to the belief by many leftwingers that corporatist takeovers are an evil of the free market system, when a "free market system" is contrary to corporatist takeovers where corporations monopolize and take complete control of entire industries which in turn destroys small businesses.
In fact "corporatist takeovers" or "monopolization" are similar to socialist governments taking complete control of a nation's infrastructure and has nothing in common with either capitalism, or a free market system.
Fascist and socialist corporatists alongside governments are using the word "privatize" when it is nothing more than corporatist takeover.
In fact "corporatist takeovers" or "monopolization" are similar to socialist governments taking complete control of a nation's infrastructure and has nothing in common with either capitalism, or a free market system.
ElectricUniverse
and now because of that ignorance most Americans will experience part of what such "wonderful socialized healthcare" is like.
theantediluvian
Privatization refers to moving some function/agent of government to the private sector. Republicans have for years been pushing for the privatization of Social Security, prisons, schools.. hell in 2012 didn't Paul Ryan present a plan to privatize Medicare by having seniors shop for coverage on an insurance exchange?
theantediluvian
I'm admittedly tired, but I think you have some unintentional equivocation in your statements and I'm having trouble following.