It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
catfishjoe
The object(s) don't seem too high above the water. Another boat perhaps. Maybe a group of fishing boats tied together??
StallionDuck
catfishjoe
The object(s) don't seem too high above the water. Another boat perhaps. Maybe a group of fishing boats tied together??
The objects were in the air on a clear night. No fishing boats. He's been piloting boats for all of his life so that would have registered to him if it were the case. Were the light starts below the image, as you can see in the pictures is where the water begins from the sky. He did mention they were not high up and not very far away, only a mile from where he was. That's REALLY close.
JayinAR
StallionDuck
catfishjoe
The object(s) don't seem too high above the water. Another boat perhaps. Maybe a group of fishing boats tied together??
The objects were in the air on a clear night. No fishing boats. He's been piloting boats for all of his life so that would have registered to him if it were the case. Were the light starts below the image, as you can see in the pictures is where the water begins from the sky. He did mention they were not high up and not very far away, only a mile from where he was. That's REALLY close.
There is no possible way he can determine how far away they are.
StallionDuck
JayinAR
StallionDuck
catfishjoe
The object(s) don't seem too high above the water. Another boat perhaps. Maybe a group of fishing boats tied together??
The objects were in the air on a clear night. No fishing boats. He's been piloting boats for all of his life so that would have registered to him if it were the case. Were the light starts below the image, as you can see in the pictures is where the water begins from the sky. He did mention they were not high up and not very far away, only a mile from where he was. That's REALLY close.
There is no possible way he can determine how far away they are.
Of course you can. How do you come by that?
I'm starting to get the impression that many of you haven't been on the water much.
You CAN determine how far off it is, even at night.
Here is a clue... How far do you think you can see out over the water on a clear day/night? I bet the answer amazes you. It's usually less than 10 miles. Those lights are far closer than 10 miles. Anyone that has spent time on the water can judge that distance easily.
JayinAR
reply to post by StallionDuck
1. Not nearly enough data to determine anything.
2. Least of all distance.
3. Bearing in mind you have no idea of distance, the boat could easily be very close and the gap between the source of light and the "horizon" could easily be the hull of the boat itself.
4. Don't insult people by implying we have no knowledge of water.
AmberLeaf
Ok so after looking at the video in more detail it does appear to be above the water, but it also appears to be much closer than the mile stated by the OP. If i was a betting man id put money on it being a quadcopter fitted with some LED's.
Making up a story to go along with some edited footage, lights in the sky, no way to prove the boat was where you say it was when filming...this is turning out to be a typical hoax. I know im quick to jump to assumptions, but although it seems much effort was put in fabricating a plausible story, the actual "craft" and editing point towards poorly though out hoax.
Why didn't he film the "UFO" flying away? Wheres the rest of the footage??
JayinAR
reply to post by StallionDuck
You don't have an argument to counter.
You have ZERO DATA.
You have a light and some water.
ZERO data to draw any calculations from whatsoever.
Your argument is dead in the water (pardon the pun)
StallionDuck
AmberLeaf
Ok so after looking at the video in more detail it does appear to be above the water, but it also appears to be much closer than the mile stated by the OP. If i was a betting man id put money on it being a quadcopter fitted with some LED's.
Making up a story to go along with some edited footage, lights in the sky, no way to prove the boat was where you say it was when filming...this is turning out to be a typical hoax. I know im quick to jump to assumptions, but although it seems much effort was put in fabricating a plausible story, the actual "craft" and editing point towards poorly though out hoax.
Why didn't he film the "UFO" flying away? Wheres the rest of the footage??
No hoax involved but you dont have to believe me. I think that if it was going to be a hoax, it would be better than a few pin points of light.
The reason there is so little video is that he was navigating the boat. What you see is the whole of the video captured, converted from an MOV file. I have the original for anyone that would like to look deeper into it, rather than just guessing. Guessing is easy and something we've done ourselves. What it was brought here for was to look deeper than simply guessing.
It wasn't meant to be "oh no! let me report this to the media and get news attention". It was simply something he noticed and captured footage of it. It could very well be a heli with LEDs. The idea was to get it here and let you guys pic it apart and see what you think it was. It was not meant to be proof of alien life, little green men or anything of the kind. It was simply weirdness that he captured, I took interest in and pushed it out here to get another idea of what it could be. We couldn't come up with any plausible idea of what it could be. It most certainly is not a hoax, though.
StallionDuck
JayinAR
reply to post by StallionDuck
You don't have an argument to counter.
You have ZERO DATA.
You have a light and some water.
ZERO data to draw any calculations from whatsoever.
Your argument is dead in the water (pardon the pun)
*Scratches Head*
Really???? So that's your answer huh? No data whatsoever...
Then please move on. Nothing more for you to see here.