It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
applesthateatpeople
Zaphod58
reply to post by applesthateatpeople
You're right, we need to start mass arrests now of people who fly. There were only 643 million people that flew in the US in 2011, so let's get right on it. That'll put a stop to those pesky contrails.
Or maybe we can go back to how it was in the 40s and 50s, and only the 1% can afford to fly, screw everyone else.
Funny, considering there aren't that many people in the US.
And, the fact remains: people who fly are trusting their LIVES to a corporation.
Seems pretty stupid to me.
Zaphod58
reply to post by Korg Trinity
I'm well aware of how dynamic the environment is, and how hard it is to model. I'm also well aware, far more than most, of how contrails are formed, why planes fly the way they do and how hard it would be for planes to carry enough to effect the environment in any useful way.
David Travis of the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater and two colleagues measured the difference, over those three contrail-free days, between the highest daytime temperature and the lowest nighttime temperature across the continental U.S. They compared those data with the average range in day-night temperatures for the period 1971-2000, again across the contiguous 48 states. Travis's team discovered that from roughly midday September 11 to midday September 14, the days had become warmer and the nights cooler, with the overall range greater by about two degrees Fahrenheit.
NightFlight
Now that the US government has shut down, we should watch the skies to see if the "chemtrails" diminish or stay the same.
If nothing else, it would show whether the government has anything to do with it or we are just imagining the whole scenario.
Right here in SC, right now at 10:47 am, the skies are the most beautiful blue I have ever seen.
Zaphod58
reply to post by Blarneystoner
Three days isn't nearly enough sample though. Even the scientists admit that it only APPEARS to have that effect. The the days after were also remarkably clear. They would need to ground the flights for several days, several times a year to know for certain if that data was a result of no contrails, or just the weather being better than usual.
Zaphod58
reply to post by Korg Trinity
It's interesting yes, but I'm not going to base an entire premise on a tiny sample of data.
Korg Trinity
AndyMayhew
Korg Trinity
AndyMayhew
Korg Trinity
Chemtrails look like Chemtrails under ALL conditions...
But they don't!
They only appear visible when contrails would also be expected to be visible and only persist when contrails would also be expected to persist.
If that was true... then the video I posted there should not have been any chemtrail at all...
Korg.
Why?
What was the altutude of the aircraft and what did the atmospheric soundings indicate?
Now, I say that if chemtrails were being sprayed we wouldn't see them - especially if they were done for clandestine reasons. After all, why make it patently obvious? There are an awful of weather geeks (like me) around the world watching the skies every day who would soon notice if contrails occurred when they shouldn't.
Aha I see what you are saying..
The reason they are visible is that their purpose is to create a global dimming effect, this can easily be achieved through the formation of cloud cover...
mrthumpy
Korg Trinity
Aloysius the Gaul
Poison the well much?
Stating that contrails cannot last longer than a few minutes defies almost 100 years of known contrail characteristics (the first persistent contrails were reported before eth end of WW1!)
Pointing out that the supposed evidence does nothing to show that these trails are anything othe than contrails is just pointing out the truth.
resorting to baseless assertions, poisoning the well and personal attacks as you have just done is the resort of people who know they do not actually have any real evidence.
No you totally misunderstand me.
I have not ever throughout this thread stated that contrails cannot at some times look exactly the same as chemtrails..
What I stated is that Chemtrails exist where contrails could not exist.
and as for poisoning the well.... if there are fools who would drink the water before testing it... let them die!
Korg.
You've yet to show why contrails can't exist in those locations. Look at those papers on ISSRs again.
Korg Trinity
Isn't it strange how there was a ban on all air traffic and the sky was remarkably clear??
Also the average temperature was worked out over the same three days from an average going back as far as the 70's...
- Science daily
"We show that there was an anomalous increase in the average diurnal temperature range for the period Sept. 11-14, 2001," the researchers reported in today's (Aug. 8) issue of the journal Nature. "Because persisting contrails can reduce the transfer of both incoming solar and outgoing infrared radiation and so reduce the daily temperature range, we attribute at least a portion of this anomaly to the absence of contrails."
The diurnal temperature range is the difference between the nighttime low temperature and the daytime high temperature, usually for a given day.
You may not like what the data suggests... but you can't deny cold hard data.
NewAgeMan
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
You're also an adherent, and protector/guard of the official story surrounding the 9/11 event am I right?
This has already been announced by a former vice president of the USA. The debate is over!