It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source
Under the new policy, new recruits will not be allowed to have tattoos that show below the elbows and knees or above the neckline.
Current soldiers may be grandfathered in, but all soldiers will still be barred from having any tattoos that are racist, sexist or extremist.
Once the rules are implemented, soldiers will sit down with their unit leaders and “self identify” each tattoo. Soldiers will be required to pay for the removal of any tattoo that violates the policy.
seeker1963
reply to post by Arnie123
Hmmmmm, wonder if that will apply if the draft ever kicks back in?
Although I did my time in service, I have a feeling the tattoo shops might become extremely busy!
Apparently, a U.S. Army soldier will no longer be allowed to have visible tattoos while wearing the uniform. They're trying to make the soldiers look more "professional".
~Lucidity
Tats that show when? When they're fully dressed? Wouldn't that just leave the hands (maybe) and face? When exactly would they show? In PT shorts? this is just bizarro.
Do we read that self-identifying exercise part and consequential removing part for the offensive tats that are below the elbow or knee, especially seeing as they are also saying existing tats on already serving people are grandfathered in (uness offensive)? I guess I'm confused.edit on 9/23/2013 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)
That is simply a matter of opinion...and you know what they say about opinions, dontcha?
Restricted
Good. Tattoos are ugly.
JohnnyCanuck
That is simply a matter of opinion...and you know what they say about opinions, dontcha?
Restricted
Good. Tattoos are ugly.
theconspirator
If a military member looks "clean cut", that makes the job of killing people look better to the public.