BREAKING - CNN- Dozens of CIA operatives on the ground during Benghazi attack!

First of all, I question the source.
CNN is in the bag for liberals.

Secondly, damnit, I nearly posted a prediction thread earlier this week.
Here is the premise: we all know Snowden has more info. He has said his "greatest fear" was that nothing would change following his initial leak.
We were told more is coming.

His insurance is his information.
When Congress voted against the idea of shutting down thhe NSA program, Snowden's fears were realized. Nothing is happening.
He leaked this info to Putin, Putin granted asylum.

My prediction was simple logic. Following the congressional vote, expect another leak soon. More dramatic.

And it isn't over yet.
Snowden has enough info to SINK this admin...and Hillary.

ETA: don't for A SECOND, trust these dipsticks at the CIA. The more I dig into the UFO phenomena, the more I realize that this organization goes three deep in their cross covers fluently.

The result is that whenever the letters CIA are used, you simply cannot trust anything you are reading. Hosers. All of them. If someone introduced themselves to me, I would probably have to struggle against the urge to test their hand skills.
(that is an open challenge)

Point being, this may or may not be a ruse. All of it. And that is how they roll.
Shady effs.
All of them.

(spits)

Of course, it could always be Petraeus. He was the director for that entire year.
Now he is not cause he was banging his ghost writer?
Easier out?
Huh, Be-tray-us lol

Ok just read the article... Ohhhh yessss!!!! This is one they can't blame on the conservatives with their "phony scandals". I guess you all know by now that Obama said that Benghazi was one of the phony ones he was referencing. Obama must have thought he was in the clear. But every time he spouts off with his arrogance, out pops another angry whistleblower. Keep up the good work you moron, we luv it when you do.

Originally posted by Helious
Something is very wrong with this story if CNN is reporting it. Liberal media does not out the shortcomings of incumbent liberal administrations, it makes excuses for them.

That is troubling.
Obama's downfall has been ordained?
Turn up the racial heat full blast?
Obama deserves impeachment but would that trigger far worse than Trayvon?

If CNN, out of all people, is breaking this story, there has to be some kind of agenda behind it. There are no two ways about it. They only let us hear what they want us to hear, and if it's not to their benefit, it never sees the light of day.

Strange times we live in.

reply to post by JayinAR

First of all, I question the source.
CNN is in the bag for liberals.

That doesn't mean the story is false.

That merely explains why the reporter waited until 5pm the day before all the members of Congress left for the summer recess.

Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
If CNN, out of all people, is breaking this story, there has to be some kind of agenda behind it. There are no two ways about it. They only let us hear what they want us to hear, and if it's not to their benefit, it never sees the light of day.

Strange times we live in.

Unless they are positive it is going to be coming out anyway, they might as well get the cretid which will make people have more belief in their stories even when false in the future.

reply to post by Char-Lee


Which could possibly be their agenda.

Maybe preparing for something in the future? Or maybe they're just playing off of Obama's bad image and trying to reel in new viewers? Either way, there's a reason they're airing this to the public, and nothing good in my opinion.

reply to post by NOTurTypical


I'm only speculating here, but could this be some sort of damage control regarding information that Edward Snowden has?

Originally posted by Asktheanimals

Originally posted by Helious
Something is very wrong with this story if CNN is reporting it. Liberal media does not out the shortcomings of incumbent liberal administrations, it makes excuses for them.

That is troubling.
Obama's downfall has been ordained?
Turn up the racial heat full blast?
Obama deserves impeachment but would that trigger far worse than Trayvon?

Maybe.....

So Obama had the CIA involved in Benghazi
so he could later get raked over the coals for the terror attack?
Ok, that sounds right.

How in holy hell do some of you not see what's
in front of you?

Did the thought ever cross anyone's mind that
there could be powerful, clandestine conservative (read white christian)
powers, in the US government, and within MANY mega corporations,
who might want to cause harm, cast a bad light, or bring shame
to the president ?

Oh no, Exxon, the Pentagon, the MIC, the NRA, the insuraunce lobby,
Wal-mart, the Koch brothers, Blackwater and Haliburton would NEVER
do such a thing. Now that's crazy.

Sheesh and y'all belong to a conspiracy site?

I have to read a lot of speculation on whether Obama is a Muslim,
a commie, a socialist, a black panther, a Kenyan, or the anti Christ
to name a few;
So let me wildly speculate.

Because I have a feeling that maybe what we are about to watch unfold
is what happens when militant dark forces of the FAR right have their
ill concieved plans, blow up in their face.

I don't know which REAL hearings I will want to watch first?

Joe Arpaio as master mind
of Fast and Furious? (if that's possible)
With voter fraud during breaks?

Or..

Issa, McConnell and Grahm for their part in hiring a merc team
and having it attack an Embassay with an anti Muhamed film
released the same time to fan flames?

Go CSPAN !

reply to post by sealing


Why would Petraeus turn on Obama when it was Obama who appointed him?
(I could see them knowing about his affair and using it for this.)
And why would he then lie to Hillary Clinton when she called him the night of the attacks?
(Deny another democratic presidency, and one with a woman at that?)
S+F btw. I like the way you think.

Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by NOTurTypical

 

I'm only speculating here, but could this be some sort of damage control regarding information that Edward Snowden has?

Edward Snowden worked for the NSA. Completely different agency.

reply to post by NOTurTypical


Snowden also worked for the CIA.
Snowden

Snowden said that in 2007 the CIA stationed him with diplomatic cover in Geneva, Switzerland, where he was responsible for maintaining computer network security.[36] Snowden described his CIA experience in Geneva as "formative", stating that the CIA deliberately got a Swiss banker drunk and encouraged him to drive home. When the latter was arrested, a CIA operative offered to intervene and later recruited the banker.[37] Swiss President Ueli Maurer commented, "It does not seem to me that it is likely that this incident played out as it has been described by Snowden and by the media."[38] The revelations come at a sensitive time for US-Swiss relations as the Swiss government attempts to pass legislation allowing for more banking transparency.[39]
The Guardian reported that Snowden left the agency in 2009 for a private contractor inside an NSA facility

Besides, with the NSA monitoring well, everything, you know that they know this too.
Hell, they could be dropping this just to distract us from the Xkeyscore program.

So let me get this straight...

CIA agents were on the ground in Libya following the overthrow of Gaddafi and this is news to people?

I guess what I'm really confused about here, is why the American people feel that Benghazi is such a momentous scandal, but don't give a damn about the illegal regime change the U.S engineered in Libya in the first place, or the fact the puppets in D.C armed islamic extremists and supplied them with all sorts of logistics, weapons, and air support to effect that change. Which is the greater injustice?

It follows logically that one event was the result of the other. You have a president that pretty much bypassed congress (much like Bush did) to declare a proxy war on a sovereign nation in which countless individuals died, yet the controversy surrounds the events at the embassy?

That's how we roll.

Originally posted by Thorneblood
That's how we roll.

Well colour me flummoxed

Why? It is a tried and true policy across the Middle East?
Something in that sand must be damned important.

Originally posted by Thorneblood
Why? It is a tried and true policy across the Middle East?
Something in that sand must be damned important.

I have no illusions about why the U.S has it's bloody finger prints all over the "Arab Spring". I guess what confuses me is why the Benghazi scandal is so momentous to some, but the events in Libya leading up to it are seemingly non-issues to the very same people crying foul.

reply to post by NOTurTypical


How this must sadden MSNBC...be interesting to see what other news outlets pick this up...I no longer follow these media outlets including FOX but this is great that someone is reporting this...