It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A late-night drive through the East Feliciana Parish town of Clinton might give the impression of just another small, sleepy Louisiana town where residents would rather be at home in bed or on the sofa watching TV.
But, in reality, there could be another reason for the quiet streets. It’s illegal to be out past 11 p.m.
Clinton resident and LSU student Tommy Mead hopes that will change. Mead sued the East Feliciana Parish town Wednesday in an effort to overturn a recently adopted curfew that bars residents — adults and children — from public places between the hours of 11 p.m. and 6 a.m.
The suit was filed on Mead’s behalf by Justin P. Harrison, legal director of the New Orleans-based ACLU Foundation of Louisiana.
George Brown, who said he lives just outside Clinton’s town limits, said the curfew means he no longer visits Clinton Quickstop, the town’s only 24-hour business, late at night. Brown suspects the city law might be hurting the store’s business during curfew hours.
“I don’t want to go to Clinton after 11 o’clock at night and subject myself to possible arrest,” Brown said.
Brown added that the curfew is perplexing, given that Clinton’s 2010 population was only about 1,600.
“There’s not too much going on,” Brown noted.
Mead often studies at the campus library until late at night and fears he could be arrested while returning to Clinton from Baton Rouge. Mead added that he frequently visits friends and stays out late and should not be subjected to arrest and prosecution for exercising his right to socialize with other people.
Mead’s suit, which also targets Mayor Lori Ann Bell and Police Chief Fred Dunn, alleges Clinton residents risk a $500 fine and/or 30 days in jail if they are “late-night dog walkers, star-gazers (or) patrons of the city’s 24-hour convenience store.”
Calls to Bell’s office and cellphone were not returned.
Dunn said Wednesday: “The citizens of the town of Clinton approached me and wanted the curfew. Until I am told otherwise, it will remain in effect.”
Awe, you said ACLU, now Neo96 is all for the curfew.
Sounds like the 'sheriff' is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. Aclu is crying people can't go out after curfew Then turn around and scream Someone civil rights were violated after they were robbed or killed!
Rather clear there YES?
Originally posted by HauntWok
reply to post by neo96
Rather clear there YES?
Absolutely, if the ACLU is opposed to something, you are for it.
We get ya.
I personally think this is stupid.
Originally posted by jude11
A town of 1600 and so far the only ones objecting to it are a student and someone who will miss his Big Gulp at midnight?
And in other thread someone will ask how these laws get passed and stay on the books. They will ask why the US is moving into a police state. They will ask why there are so many freedoms, rights, liberties taken away day by day.
Well here's the answer on a mini scale to study and answer all those questions.
It's because no one gives a damn and 2 people can't carry the load for an entire town.
Take that to a National scale and the answer is quite clear.
Peace
Originally posted by HauntWok
reply to post by neo96
But it is stupid neo, there are so many legitimate reasons to be out past 11 at night. Not the least of which is "I feel like being out after 11 at night and this is America."