It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PatriotGames2
Do people really believe this crap?
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Indigo5
The way I read it, they were in a different list that was separate from the whole.
It even had a name, the 'Emerging Issues list.
Then there's that part of the story where the emerging issues were held up for 27 months while progressive groups were put through the system.
Despite the recent revelations, the BOLO could still be problematic for the IRS. The list’s “emerging issues” category included only conservative terms at the outset, raising questions about why the IRS prioritized conservative groups but none from the left.
The term “progressive” appeared in a separate part of the BOLO, under the “touch and go historical” criteria.
Questions remain about when and how the progressive terms were used, as well as whether BOLO categories other than “emerging issues” were even relevant to the audit. The IRS and George’s office said this week that they’re still looking into those matters.
Again if your purpose is to point out they were treated differently...yes they were...correct and agree.
I was not being dishonest when I claimed they were on the same list..it was reported that way and technically accurate
I remain of the strong mindset that this was not politically motivated.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
292 Conservative groups were targeted and 6 Progressive groups. That's a 50-1 discrepancy from being "equal".
Originally posted by butcherguy
I remain of the strong mindset that this was not politically motivated.
I am not so sure of this.
What differentiated the two groups, other than their political leanings, for the IRS to treat them differently?
If you can't come up with something other than politics, it remains that this was politically motivated.
“We haven’t proved political motivation,” said Representative Charles Boustany Jr., a Louisiana Republican who, as the chairman of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight, is leading one inquiry.
Senator Roy Blunt, Republican of Missouri, said that in retrospect, suggestions that Mr. Obama had orchestrated an I.R.S. attack on his political enemies were unwarranted.
“Presidents have always been very careful about maintaining the appearance of keeping hands off the I.R.S.,” he said. “I don’t have any reason to believe there wasn’t targeting of conservatives, but it might well have been a lot more than that as well.”
One of them had an Anti-Tax platform?
Noun 1. political platform - a document stating the aims and principles of a political partypolitical platform - a document stating the aims and principles of a political party
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
292 Conservative groups were targeted and 6 Progressive groups. That's a 50-1 discrepancy from being "equal".
Out of how many applicants?
For every 9 White people whose registration to vote is approved, only 1 African American's application is approved!
All we need to do is disreagrd that African Americans make up only 12% of the population.
Idealogical fever...you are fighting a culture war while the republic suffers.
"In total, 30 percent of the organizations we identified with the words 'progress' or 'progressive' in their names were processed as potential political cases," George wrote to Rep. Sandy Levin, D-Mich., the top Democrat on the Ways and Means Committee. "In comparison, our audit found that 100 percent of the tax-exempt applications with Tea Party, Patriots, or 9/12 in their names were processed as potential political cases during the timeframe of our audit."
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Indigo5
One of them had an Anti-Tax platform?
I get it that the IRS might have a reason to oppose such a thing....
BUT,
You do realize that the IRS singling Tea Party out because of their platform is completely political, right? As the correct appellation is 'Political Platform'.
But it is a leap to go from there to the Left/Right thing...
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
292 Conservative groups were targeted and 6 Progressive groups. That's a 50-1 discrepancy from being "equal".
Out of how many applicants?
For every 9 White people whose registration to vote is approved, only 1 African American's application is approved!
All we need to do is disreagrd that African Americans make up only 12% of the population.
Idealogical fever...you are fighting a culture war while the republic suffers.
Let's try percentages again:
"In total, 30 percent of the organizations we identified with the words 'progress' or 'progressive' in their names were processed as potential political cases," George wrote to Rep. Sandy Levin, D-Mich., the top Democrat on the Ways and Means Committee. "In comparison, our audit found that 100 percent of the tax-exempt applications with Tea Party, Patriots, or 9/12 in their names were processed as potential political cases during the timeframe of our audit."
The numbers are the same as when I posted them before, but the first time I posted them, you wouldn't accept my source (cns) and said that the story was old. This time it is from CBS and the story is much more recent.
Originally posted by butcherguy
You think it was purely coincidental that they separated the right-wing from the left? Luck of the draw?
Are you wondering why the 30% number only represents "Progressive" for a search? Can we see the stats for all left leaning orgs for a fair comparison?
Um... cause those are the phony scandals he is talking about.
Originally posted by TDawg61
Economic solution?Why isn't this guy being impeached?Bengazi,NSA abuses,IRS abuses and helping to incite race riot(travon)?
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by butcherguy
You think it was purely coincidental that they separated the right-wing from the left? Luck of the draw?
No...I think the IRS targeted specific groups whose paltform ranged from antogonist toward the IRS and Taxes, to outright calling for the abolishment of the IRS as an illegal organization.
If OWS had the same platform, they would have been equally targeted as an org. that was potentially avoiding taxes.
But Liberal/Conservative as a general principle or political perspective wasn't a factor.
Don't know how to say it any other way.
Originally posted by macman
Your crystal ball for the excuses given is mind boggling.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Indigo5
Are you wondering why the 30% number only represents "Progressive" for a search? Can we see the stats for all left leaning orgs for a fair comparison?
This covers the ones that were singled out.
The stories that I have read so far state that the left leaning groups that were 'singled out' were picked because the word 'progressive' was in their names. The criteria for the 'righties' was if they used 'Tea Party', 'Patriots' or '9/12' in their names.
Again, more unfairness, in that they only singled out the lefties using one word, while they used more to single out righties.
Documents released by Cummings on Friday included a May 3, 2013, email between George and his deputy for investigations. In those documents, the deputy concluded after a search of 5,500 IRS emails that there was no sign of political motives in Tea Party searches.
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by macman
Your crystal ball for the excuses given is mind boggling.
Hey Mac...nothing personal...but don't like your style and won't be engaging..lots of bait, few links.
Again...conflating political motivation with targeting groups likely to avoid taxes.