It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by thesaneone
So juries are perfect and their verdicts should never be debated.
So juries are perfect and their verdicts should never be debated.
I'm no ones "cheerleader". I seek the truth.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by thesaneone
So juries are perfect and their verdicts should never be debated.
They are as perfect as it gets, IMO.
I'd rather be tried by a jury than some of the judges in our system.
There's reasonable doubt that zimmerman is lying.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by thesaneone
So juries are perfect and their verdicts should never be debated.
I guess I just don't understand how the person holding the gun can feel threatened by the person who is unarmed, especially if they are just a teenager.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by thesaneone
So juries are perfect and their verdicts should never be debated.
Sure, we can debate their verdict for years. But what isn't up for debate is the witness and expert testimony, the evidence, the law in FL or the outcome of the jury decision.
He didn't go to jail because they did not have the evidence to charge him with anything.
You just can't hold someone in jail without charging them.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by thesaneone
So juries are perfect and their verdicts should never be debated.
Sure, we can debate their verdict for years. But what isn't up for debate is the witness and expert testimony, the evidence, the law in FL or the outcome of the jury decision.
You can debate the law to decide if it should he changed sure, what you cannot debate is what the law was that was in place at the time of the incident. People may be able to pressure the FL lawmakers to change the self-defense law, but the federal statute won't change. Self-defense is a Constitutional right.
Why can't the law in Florida be up for debate? Should we abide by laws we feel are unjust, unfair, unethical etc and just be good sheep?
but GZ wouldnt have been put in that position if he LISTENED to the 911 operator.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by thesaneone
So juries are perfect and their verdicts should never be debated.
Sure, we can debate their verdict for years. But what isn't up for debate is the witness and expert testimony, the evidence, the law in FL or the outcome of the jury decision.
Why can't the law in Florida be up for debate? Should we abide by laws we feel are unjust, unfair, unethical etc and just be good sheep?
Originally posted by ShadellacZumbrum
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
I guess I just don't understand how the person holding the gun can feel threatened by the person who is unarmed, especially if they are just a teenager.
Your statement is Lacking and Fouled as hell.
To start off with it is not like he was holding the gun to him from the get go. So you need to rething that.
Secondely, how can you NOT see a guy taking an a$$ whipping as being Threatened?
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by thesaneone
So juries are perfect and their verdicts should never be debated.
Sure, we can debate their verdict for years. But what isn't up for debate is the witness and expert testimony, the evidence, the law in FL or the outcome of the jury decision.
Why can't the law in Florida be up for debate? Should we abide by laws we feel are unjust, unfair, unethical etc and just be good sheep?