It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The story from Vermont, of all places, is breathtakingly simple: the elected city council, in a bi-partisan vote, has decided to keep its law-making process secret, rather than openly address the question of whether a draconian no-trespass law it passed last winter is patently unconstitutional.
That's right, rather than explain why the law it passed is constitutional, the Burlington City Council is hiding behind lawyer-client privilege as if it - the council - were some private corporation rather than a democratically-elected local government.
The ordinance in question, the "Church Street Marketplace District Trespass Authority," passed the City Council unanimously in February 2013. The council vote followed seven public hearings at which some concerns were raised and addressed, but no controversy arose. The ordinance allows the immediate and arbitrary banishment of people from public streets with no due process of law and no effective appeal process.
The current law imposes “time-out” penalties — removal from the Marketplace district — for repeat violations of existing prohibitions: disorderly conduct, unlawful mischief and the possession of regulated drugs and open containers of alcohol.
Banishment ranges from a day (first offense) up to one year (for third and subsequent offenses).
Similar guidelines have been in place since 2010 for City Hall Park, and more recently, for Fletcher Free Library.
In February, councilors unanimously approved the ordinance for offenses in the marketplace — following nine public hearings, and after receiving assurance from the City Attorney’s Office that the guidelines did not subvert constitutional protections. That vetting of the ordinance was placed off-limits to public scrutiny with the council’s invocation of attorney-client privilege.
Originally posted by EViLKoNCEPTz
reply to post by Spider879
Peaceably assemble does not include disorderly conduct, criminal mischief, open alcohol containers, drug use or public intoxication.
2nd line is for
Originally posted by EViLKoNCEPTz
reply to post by Spider879
Peaceably assemble does not include disorderly conduct, criminal mischief, open alcohol containers, drug use or public intoxication.
2nd line is for