It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
Originally posted by seabag
This is what I envision when I hear Zimmerman’s account and what the witness described.
edit on 28-6-2013 by seabag because: (no reason given)
The impression I'm getting is that Trayvons hips were against George's and his legs spread either side of Zimmerman's. That doesn't sound like a very advantageous position for someone who is 40lb lighter than the person below them, unless they have great confidence in their ground fighting abilities, and are able to quickly get into a position like the one in your photo.
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
one witness says trayvon asked why are you following me?
Originally posted by Grimpachi
You have to wonder why the state called that witness proving TM was on top.
Originally posted by Grimpachi
Is it just me or does it seem like the prosecutions choice of witnesses today seem like they should have been called by the defense.
My god this case has been torn apart I just can’t see how the prosecution thought this case should go to trial. The state had to of known their case was crap to begin with. There is a reason they didn’t arrest George that night or following day.
All this has just confirmed to me that this entire trial is nothing but a dog and pony show to appease the MSM community.
a killing caused by dangerous conduct and the offender's obvious lack of concern for human life. Second-degree murder may best be viewed as the middle ground between first-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter.
Originally posted by dudeman351
Wasn't it raining?
www.leg.state.fl.us.../0782/0782.html
782.02 Justifiable use of deadly force.—The use of deadly force is justifiable when a person is resisting any attempt to murder such person or to commit any felony upon him or her…
Where are these "blood soaked" pictures you speak of? I don't see ANY in these photos. This Thread...Page 8
Originally posted by starfoxxx
All the evidence and proof points to Zimmerman being in reasonable fear.. The blood soaked pictures show us Zimmerman beat up, while the autopsy showed us that Martin had no abrasions or marks on him..
Lets look at it this way, if you started beating up a police officer, punched him in the face, put him on the ground and beat that officers head in the ground, the officer will pull his gun and shoot, as any reasonable person would.. Hands down, Zimmerman is an innocent man.... Game over..
Originally posted by dudeman351
reply to post by seabag
As far as i know manslaughter isn't on the table. Its either murder 2 or acquittal. Like I said as far as I know, I may be wrong.
Originally posted by WonderBoi
Where are these "blood soaked" pictures you speak of? I don't see ANY in these photos. This Thread...Page 8
You call that blood SOAKED? Looks photoshopped to me. Even IF it is real, getting your @$$ kicked doesn't give you the right to shoot and kill someone. Amazing he had enough time to pull the trigger.
Originally posted by starfoxxx
Originally posted by WonderBoi
Where are these "blood soaked" pictures you speak of? I don't see ANY in these photos. This Thread...Page 8
Wow, totally missed it by a long shot...
Martin had NO injuries except one gun shot, indicating from the pictures, zimmermans head was being rammed into the concrete after Martin sucker punched him in the nose...
Proof is in the pudding..edit on 28-6-2013 by starfoxxx because: (no reason given)