It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Conclusion :
Exciting as an extraterrestrial visitation to earth would be, this paper has pointed out that in the current state of our knowledge UFO phenomena are not consistent with the common interpretation of this hypothesis. Neither do the observed patterns support the theory that all UFOs can be explained as combinations of natural effects, or as psycho-sociological processes.
Therefore it is proposed that future research in this field could fruitfully explore alternative hypotheses, such as those involving either natural or artificial control systems, earth lights or wormhole travel. The arguments raised here are not intended as a complete refutation of the ETH or the natural phenomena hypothesis.
Until the nature and origin of UFO phenomena can be firmly established it will naturally be possible to hypothesize that extraterrestrial factors, including undiscovered forms of consciousness, are playing a role in its manifestations.
Originally posted by happinness
Even David Icke ignored my E mails! I
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by jimmiec
I don't always believe the official story...and obviously they lied in the Roswell incident...but even pro-UFO investigators learned there were temperature inversions in Washington which supported the official story:
Originally posted by Casualboy100
btw I think the best proof of aliens was when the UFOs were over washington capital? or was it whitehouse?
channel.nationalgeographic.com...
Even if you don't believe the official story, it has enough plausibility that the Washington incident doesn't even come close to proof, and in my opinion, the official story in this case is probably close to correct.
Air Force intelligence director John Samford told the press that the sightings may have been a false radar reading, caused by a temperature inversion in the atmosphere.edit on 9-3-2013 by Arbitrageur because: clarification
Originally posted by milomilo
OP there are not a single proof of alien existense and visitation on earth. not a single proof.
there are massive encounters documented but not a single one of them proof existence of aliens , in fact it said other wise..
please read this : www.scientificexploration.org...
Five Arguments Against the Extraterrestrial Origin of Unidentified Flying Objects
Argument One: Close Encounter Frequency
Argument Two: Physiology
Argument Three: Abduction Reports
Argument Four: History
Argument Five: Physical Considerations
Conclusion :
Exciting as an extraterrestrial visitation to earth would be, this paper has pointed out that in the current state of our knowledge UFO phenomena are not consistent with the common interpretation of this hypothesis. Neither do the observed patterns support the theory that all UFOs can be explained as combinations of natural effects, or as psycho-sociological processes.
Therefore it is proposed that future research in this field could fruitfully explore alternative hypotheses, such as those involving either natural or artificial control systems, earth lights or wormhole travel. The arguments raised here are not intended as a complete refutation of the ETH or the natural phenomena hypothesis.
Until the nature and origin of UFO phenomena can be firmly established it will naturally be possible to hypothesize that extraterrestrial factors, including undiscovered forms of consciousness, are playing a role in its manifestations.
Before you throw away vallee's hypothesis, please review the encounter data yourself and see the patterns of UFO encounters there.. Study the patterns and you will form your own conclusions.. but ditch the modern ufology myths like roswell, alien corpse, crashed saucers, underground bases and conspiracy theories, all of them are fantasy created for the sake of amusement and entertainment and not based on truth..
edit on 10-3-2013 by milomilo because: grammar spelling
Originally posted by LionOfGOD
No.
There is only EVIDENCE.
Not a single piece of PROOF.
None.
They didn't shoot at anything, did they? In fact if they did see anything at all they couldn't get near enough to shoot at it...which reminds me of the time Capt Mantell died trying to chase a balloon. In Washington, they were probably some astronomical objects involved, so even farther away than the balloon.
Originally posted by K-PAX-PROT
So the US militray were actually shooting at a false radar reading of temperature inversions in the atmosphere
You can find links to all three here on ATS by doing a search. Here are some external sources to add:
Originally posted by HamP1980
reply to post by Arbitrageur
Are you able to post the links to the first three cases? Maybe I am messing up the words. I mean: explained=solved. I am sure people do have different opinions/explanations about the subject, but are they solved?
The Billy Meier? Do people still believe in that hoaxer? Even his ex-wife confessed that Billy Meier was faking the saucers with a trashcan lid, her missing Christmas ornaments and some paint. Sigh
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
They didn't shoot at anything, did they? In fact if they did see anything at all they couldn't get near enough to shoot at it...which reminds me of the time Capt Mantell died trying to chase a balloon. In Washington, they were probably some astronomical objects involved, so even farther away than the balloon.
Originally posted by K-PAX-PROT
So the US militray were actually shooting at a false radar reading of temperature inversions in the atmosphere
I think they got shoot down orders, but I never found where they fired a shot, but point me to a source if I missed something.
And of course the B-25 crew did see something...the radar target in the sky was a steam boat on the water, according to them, apparently reflected off the thermal inversion. So they couldn't shoot it down because it was already down!
Correct. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own merits.
Originally posted by K-PAX-PROT
So this was a one off then, not one other case like it,
Originally posted by Xtrozero
God! It is HIDEOUS!!!