It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Svipdagr
reply to post by liejunkie01
Read the company history at some point they were underpaying all upper level management after the 2nd filing for bankruptcy. Truth is the union wanted too much, too much into pension/retirement, they couldn't compromise after the bankruptcy. Only a third of the company's workers were in unions. They were warned of what is going with the company presently and what could happen in the future. They were warned of the dire situation and that a strike would give the finishing blow to the company...
And there you have it, the end. Now 18,000+ people are out of jobs, congratulations 1/3rd of the company for screwing everyone else over.
Originally posted by steve1709
Let me get this right. A bunch of union groupies refuse to work for this company over a few bucks more a week, to the point that they cause the company to go broke and in doing so lose the jobs of everybody that works there. So due to them wanting a bit more in their pay packet, they have now caused people to have no pay packet at all. Wow, how smart are they. I don't usually back the boss but in this case it looks like the tough guy union pr1cks have pushed that little bit too hard. I wonder how many of those union rep freaks have no job now, or have they simply moved on to another shop floor to do it all over again. Yea for the union reps. Bet they are still pulling in weekly money from "union funds" Isn't there a fiction book called Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand that where the unions do something similar so the owner of the company burns his business to the ground. Sorry for the families that will do xmas tough but for the actual blokes who went on strike for the extra few bucks, I can't help thinking that in many cases, it serves them right.
Originally posted by kawika
I drove by this group out on the picket line in Columbus on Thursday. I wanted to stop and get out and tell them "do you know how hard it is to get a job right now? Go back to work, what is wrong with you people"
Originally posted by HabiruThorstein
For anyone who actually wants to learn something (pessimistic estimate, 1% of you) there are not 2 but 3 distinct parties involved in today's union v employer disputes. The union rank and file, the company management, and the union bosses.
Originally posted by muse7
I want to see all the greedy people who made their money off the backs of the poor and middle class lose it all, and truly understand what it's like to be at the mercy of crappy, greedy bosses and have your benefits whisked away or watch your co-workers laid off one by one until it comes down to you so the shareholders can have more money, and CEO's can buy a 10th vacation home.edit on 11/17/2012 by muse7 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Ahabstar
I would have done the job for $30K and been ecstatic about such a wage. And given the automation in plants today, most people just pushed buttons for that. $43K to make Twinkies? That is a big Twinkie, indeed.
Originally posted by anton74
They CEO reduced his and all of the other top executives salaries to $1.00, but nobody seems to care about that part. Stop trying to pawn this off on upper management.
Originally posted by anton74
They CEO reduced his and all of the other top executives salaries to $1.00, but nobody seems to care about that part. Stop trying to pawn this off on upper management.
Originally posted by HabiruThorstein
For anyone who actually wants to learn something (pessimistic estimate, 1% of you) there are not 2 but 3 distinct parties involved in today's union v employer disputes. The union rank and file, the company management, and the union bosses. If anyone doesn't want to believe it, look up Ashenfelter and Johnson's groundbreaking study from 1969. Contrary to the knee-jerk reaction of liberals, none of the brass at Hostess are getting rich from shutting the place down because the company is in Chapter 11 and creditors get first $$$ of whatever they raise from selling off assets. The union rank and file, working with asymmetric information as always, decided to listen to the 3rd distinctly identifiable party involved, the union bosses, and voted to lose their jobs as well those of their co-workers. The union leadersip is what doomed this, and they've over-reached any number of times in the past as well. They don't lose their jobs over this, they have a 'tough-on-The-Man' bit of street cred to anyone who just decides to blame Hostess, nothing lost to them. The workers lose their jobs, the investors lose their company, the union brass will point fingers and deflect blame. Somewhere in Mexico, someone is getting ready to buy the rights to the Hostess brand names, will fire up the ovens, and quite likely do so profitably.
While unions are necessary, too few of the pro-union folks really understand just how different the goals of the union leadership and regular rank and file members truly differ. I've been a member of 2 unions, both of them existed to serve the union leadership, not better things for us regular Joe's.edit on 17-11-2012 by HabiruThorstein because: typos
Originally posted by liejunkie01
Originally posted by anton74
They CEO reduced his and all of the other top executives salaries to $1.00, but nobody seems to care about that part. Stop trying to pawn this off on upper management.
I just did a quick Google search.
Look at the wall street journal. There is a nice article that states otherwise friend.
If I could link it I would.
It seems they are questioning managements moves right before the filing.
Yes it is managements fault. They could nit handle a multi- multi million dollar company.