It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A B.C. teen who aspires to be a journalist says his rights were violated when he was set upon by security guards and then arrested by police after photographing an incident at Metrotown shopping mall in Burnaby, B.C.
Metrotown mall backs the actions of its security guards. “He didn't comply with the request of the security nor the RCMP, so they took appropriate action they deemed necessary to defuse the situation,” said Doug MacDougall, of Metrotown Properties. MacDougall said that Markiewicz was told that he couldn't take pictures inside the mall.
I would like to film in the mall, how do I go about doing this?
News crews can gain access and approval to be on site by calling 604.438.4700. At no time can a camera crew film inside any stores or restaurants without prior consent from the store or restaurant manager. Requests by students/special projects will be evaluated on an individual basis. Please submit a written request: [email protected]
Originally posted by Hijinx
blog.privacylawyer.ca...
interesting read if anyone is interested.
The police can not tell you to delete any photographic or video of them performing their duties in a public space.
Originally posted by kalisdad
Originally posted by Hijinx
blog.privacylawyer.ca...
interesting read if anyone is interested.
The police can not tell you to delete any photographic or video of them performing their duties in a public space.
1) its not public space, its private property
2) security guards are not police
3) the kid broke the rules about no photography that are posted on the official Metrotown website and most likely posted at the enterance to the building
again, not saying the kid should have been accosted or arrested, just saying he should have paid more attention to the rules.
this would be thrown out of court quite quickly IMOedit on 30-10-2012 by kalisdad because: (no reason given)