It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jerk_Idiot
reply to post by ubeenhad
More recently string theory. There are only TEN dimensions. Anyone who believes in a eleventh dimension was a quack and was effectively banned. There was no such thing as super gravity. Funny thing though is that they found string theory would not work and ended up with five theory's ALL correct! But if you added in the eleventh dimension and super gravity string theory now worked again and ended up with one theory again!
Originally posted by TheSparrowSings
Originally posted by TheSparrowSings
Then why is there constant discovery.....and rewards for those who make them?
Because there is obviously still alot to be discovered in science. And these people DO deserve to be rewarded. Sometimes they even step out of that "box". I don't question everything about mainstream science, in fact without it we would know nothing. What I do question is allowing "Scientific data" (ei: dating) to dictate to us the age of monuments when it is obvious that other factors (Such as the use of sidereel mechanics and local "mythos") hold just as much probability, if not more, as our scientific methods.
Originally posted by ubeenhad
reply to post by Harte
Were have you been my whole life!?
Originally posted by RussianScientists
reply to post by ubeenhad
Geology has been full of BS. Main stream geology was all about man evolving from ape. Man evolving from ape was just proved wrong because DNA doesn't change.
Originally posted by RussianScientistsGeology has stated that earthquakes can't be predicted, let alone detect any signal prior to their taking place. Piezoseismology proves that completely incorrect.
Originally posted by RussianScientists
reply to post by ubeenhad
Geology has been full of BS. Main stream geology was all about man evolving from ape. Man evolving from ape was just proved wrong because DNA doesn't change.
Geology has stated that earthquakes can't be predicted, let alone detect any signal prior to their taking place. Piezoseismology proves that completely incorrect.
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Ya, why would we give any merit to something as useless as scientific data when we can just watch ancient aliens.
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Ya, why would we give any merit to something as useless as scientific data when we can just watch ancient aliens.
Originally posted by TheSparrowSings
So now, answer my question. Do you FULLY believe that our flawed system of dating structures is always accurate because that is what mainstream science says or is it probable that accurate interpretations of dates could be presented through local stories/connecting the dots or sidereel mechanics??
Why 100% dismiss the theory stated in my first response to you??
edit on 12/10/2012 by TheSparrowSings because: you still haven't answered
Originally posted by yampa
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Originally posted by yampa
I knew exactly what they were. I had some fun with those back in my early student years.
Their symetrical. Most life forms on earth are, including us. This is why its easy to see facial features.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by yampa
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Originally posted by yampa
I knew exactly what they were. I had some fun with those back in my early student years.
Their symetrical. Most life forms on earth are, including us. This is why its easy to see facial features.
en.wikipedia.org...
You studied this particular set of numbers? What did you think about the factorial relationship found here?
Originally posted by ubeenhad
And your gunna have to be more specific. What system of dating are you refering to? Im assuming your talking about radiocarbon dating?
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Originally posted by yampa
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Originally posted by yampa
I knew exactly what they were. I had some fun with those back in my early student years.
Their symetrical. Most life forms on earth are, including us. This is why its easy to see facial features.
en.wikipedia.org...
You studied this particular set of numbers? What did you think about the factorial relationship found here?
No dude. Obviously not.
Lots of number triangles do
Originally posted by yampa
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Originally posted by yampa
Originally posted by ubeenhad
Originally posted by yampa
I knew exactly what they were. I had some fun with those back in my early student years.
Their symetrical. Most life forms on earth are, including us. This is why its easy to see facial features.
en.wikipedia.org...
You studied this particular set of numbers? What did you think about the factorial relationship found here?
No dude. Obviously not.
Lots of number triangles do
Ok, I've looked at other number triangles too (Pascal's triangle has a cute couple low down) but these are the most novel I've seen at low levels of the triangle. Did you keep any images from your other explorations? What did you use to render them?
I find it interesting that these things existed latently in the universe long before the existence of earth's biology.
Originally posted by TheSparrowSings
Originally posted by ubeenhad
And your gunna have to be more specific. What system of dating are you refering to? Im assuming your talking about radiocarbon dating?
All forms of radioactive dating. Whether it be Uranium-lead or Chlorine or Carbon Dating. None of these (although we will get closer someday) can be said to 100% accurate, 100% of the time.
When I look at sites like Macchu Picchu, again I have to say that it looks like an amalgamation of an ancient structure and rebuilding. Many of these sites do. But the older portions are more precise... or difficult to replicate even with our current technology. Like humanity was at a high point then lost alot/most of their progress somehow. It seems humanity could be alot older and wiser than the standard evolutionary models allow.
Originally posted by ubeenhad
As hard as it is to accept, math is a human thing. Dont read too much into fractals and curious number sequences. There are symmetries in nature that arise from their geometric shapes. A circle is a circle and its 360degrees angle that forms it. This basic fact influences anything with circular shapes.
Originally posted by yampa
Originally posted by ubeenhad
As hard as it is to accept, math is a human thing. Dont read too much into fractals and curious number sequences. There are symmetries in nature that arise from their geometric shapes. A circle is a circle and its 360degrees angle that forms it. This basic fact influences anything with circular shapes.
The operation we perform at this moment in time might be a human thing, but these number sequences are not created by humans. These number sequences existed before there were humans. When we map and plot the structure of numbers, we are collecting data. We do not create this data, nor the underlying structures found in numbers. Biology must be built from these patterns. What else would biology use to build a biological computer (nervous system etc) other than the natural structure of numbers?
Pretty neat that the binary from each of these figures adds up to the factorial for that row.
So row 13, the last figure on the right, if added up = 13 x 12 x 11 x 10 x 9 x 8 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = 13! = 6227020800
Factorials are very important to number theory.