It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
OP, you need a reality check. An insurance claim for a broken arm is 20,000 pounds. Let's say a flood goes through the neighborhood, damages 50 of the insured homes. Insurance works because the companies are huge. Little groups like your suggesting would end the moment a freak storm did some damage. P
You're not understanding the basics of insurance. You are seeing it in a philosophical perspective. If people could do what you want them to do they would have already done it. You are being belligernt about your lack of knowledge as well. We are trying to tell you how the real world works and you're there fighting for your idea rather than trying to learn and absorb what some of the issues are. I won't bother trying to educate you any more on this topic because you think you've got it down. So go try it and report back. I predict you will have your tail between your legs.
What happens when one of the insured's is at fault and crashes into a 100,000 dollar Mercedes being driven by a neurosurgeon, who because of the accident can no longer work due to nerve problems? He and his insurance company (you can bet your life on this) are going to come after the at fault driver and this insurance group that you have set up. Lawyer fees alone could empty your million dollar coffer, not to mention any settlement made or any award the jury finds.
Originally posted by mee30
reply to post by smurfy
What if the crasher, and the crashed were scammers and adding personal injury. And what if a crasher is really an innocent party in all three strikes, but loses all three court cases, the figures of which, might be way out of estimate. That's the way the law works, third party claim is mandatory and could be any figure, vehicle crash repair is expensive even to the point that some insurers nowadays might insist on second hand parts be used in the repairs. Your million dollars is mere petty cash in that scenario.
The amount you have in the pot is variable and up to you. The figure is purely an example. Scammers will be quickly weeded out by the 3 strike system, plus why would people want to lose this deal? Also to start with you could keep the cap on the car price pretty low and go from there.
The costs spread over a 1000 people is no big deal. Even if the cost of one crash was £100,000 it would only cost each person a one off £100 payment, which they could well get back if the crasher wants their strike back.
I think you miss the point, repair damage, while expensive, is tiny in comparison to what the legal eagles can throw at you in terms of third party injury, and the courts cannot be avoided, they can also be very singular if a case is proven to their satisfaction. Scammers on the other hand, continue to work every trick in the book, a big problem in insurance, since it always includes mechanical damage and personal injury. There is more, if you as an insurer, are a combatant against a government body, they don't carry insurance, and you have again to prove your case in a court, so you can see there what you might be up against. signature:
Where are you going to find 1,000 people who won't lie and make false claims?
Originally posted by mee30
reply to post by Socrato
Where are you going to find 1,000 people who won't lie and make false claims?
What would it matter? Make a 2 strike system if you like. How long will they hang around? They will be weeded out and lose out on extremely cheap insurance for life.
Okay but to safeguard yourself you could have a policy that states to join you need 3 years no claims?
The possibilities are endless.
Let me ask you, if you could pay for 1 year then pay next to nothing for the rest of your life would you screw that up?
Originally posted by mee30
reply to post by randomname
that's exactly what an insurance company does.
Why are so many saying this? GRRRRRR
I have never heard of an insurance company that you pay into for 1 year only then only pay a portion WHEN there is a crash!
I know insurance companies invest money for crying out loud! That is not the point here. Please read it again and the other comments. This could really work.
Oh and a meager £20,000 between 1000 people is nothing. £20 each. Which would eventually be paid back by the guilty party.
And how will you deal with the rule breakers? How can you enforce policies without violence? A group of 1,000 people can get pretty wild, selfish and back stabbing. Especially when there is a potential million $,$$$,$$$ in the bank. You would have to have a whole governing body set up and hold meetings to decide cases. Who gets paid what and who doesn't. You would have to send out statements and have accountants.
Originally posted by mee30
I just thought of another idea. You could have a sort of tier system too whereby if you are on the deal for the second year you move into a pool of people that have not lost any strikes for the first year. If you lose a strike then you stay in the first year pool. And as the years go by, if you have not claimed you will be in a pool with thousands of other people that have not claimed. Imagine how often you will pay out then?
What do you think of that?
Because there are car accidents EVERY DAY. Thus, you would never reach your WHEN there is a crash scenario....well actually you would, every day Also, insurance claims are not just about the vehicle. You reach down to turn on your radio, taking your eyes off the road for a few seconds...and run into a mother and her three children crossing the street in a designated crosswalk. You kill the mom and youngest child, permantly maiming the other two children. Nope, you weren't paying attention but that doesn't let the insurance company off the hook. This stuff happens EVERY DAY too. If you have ever worked in the claims department of an insurance company, you would have a different point of view.
Now, this sounds a lot more reasonable and workable. You have to weed out the cheaters and thieves and just plain bad drivers. Something like this gets the people to agree to their place and their benefits before hand with a reward for being good.
Just curious though, if this were health insurance... wouldn't you possibly be weeding some of the people who need it the most?
I totally thought you meant this plan in a communist way. I was thinking it was like the old west all over again... Yea, if it's a business model, then why don't you give it a shot? It's worth a try. You'd never know if it works or not without trying it first.
You could simply state that this insurance has a MAX limit... deal with it. You could register as LLC so your pants could not be sued off. You would need some damn good lawyers on call though. That would be expensive.