It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What was said is that the guy was "ultra-feminine" and "looked gay". That is perceiving and identifying someone as gay, solely because of gay stereotypes. That's the only thing I am protesting about that. With that being said, I don't know anyone who has a severe lisp, but what I do know is that I don't really know anyone's sexuality, I don't know if this guy is gay or not. None of us truly know what a person does behind closed doors unless their open about it. But I won't assume someone is gay solely based on their gestures.
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
Calm Down, Take a deep Breath. Stop being so reactionary.
Well I agree that the guy in the video is a jerk. He has made a statement in the one of the least useful ways. Second I never said the guy was gay because he has a lisp. I have a friend who has a severe lisp and he is super straight. No wait I know two guys like that actually. Both totally strait.
Gaydar is biological, it is true everyone has at the very least the potential to have it and it be accurate, but actually women have better gaydar than men as a means to identify a man as a potential mate for them. My gaydar is very accurate; the thing is, I don't identify someone as potentially being gay based on their gestures or how they speak. I identify someone as potentially gay based on their aura. Plus since I'm attractive and a natural flirt I can test a guy's reactions to that and see how he responds. A lot of men who say they're straight or are in relationships with women are not straight whatsoever. But to say that all men know a guy is gay off-the-bat is completely false. I don't know many straight men who knew Gareth Thomas was gay, for example, as I read all the time how straight guys are surprised someone as masculine as Gareth is into men. A lot (not all) straight guys identify someone as gay based on if a guy is masculine or feminine and gay stereotypes. That is not an accurate way of identifying someone as gay.
As a guy you know just as well as any other guy if the guy next to you is gay. You yourself admit having gaydar! It's not just for gay people. All guys have it. DO you deny your gaydar is very accurate? Cause you just said it works pretty damned good. SO why would you think that it's not a guy thing to posses gaydar and only a gay thing? All guys have gaydar. For 99.9% of the men in the world its very accurate. If a bunch of guys say some other guy is gay then he probably is.
Because gay stereotypes are not an accurate way of identifying a person as gay, and are used to look down on gay men.
What I don't get is simply because most guys are able to easily tell if someone is gay or not that you automatically assume it means the guys have anything against gays? Most of the guys I know don't care one way or the other which way a dude swings.
That is very much the main reason why gaydar exists, as a means to identify, maybe not as a pecking order per se, but to, as you said, know who's who. Especially for women who seek a mate to come together and create life with. But simply because gaydar exists does not mean it's accurate for everyone. For many, gaydar is very inaccurate.
But one could argue that since humans have evolved into being social animals there is a strong biological need to know who's who in the pecking order of a tribe. Who's the alpha male etc... Ever think that our ability to perceive other sexual preference might have something to do with our biological evolution into a social species with a cast system or order?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
All the owner of Chick-Fil-A said was that he supports traditional marriage. He didn't call for any action against gay people or anything .. he just said that his faith is such that he supports traditional marriage. What is pathetic is that people who are screaming for 'tolerance', refuse to tolerate that this fella has a right to his religious beliefs. He didn't hurt anyone and he didn't do anything except answer a question that was put to him ... 'where do you stand on gay marriage'.
I support Gay Marriage as a civil right. I also support the constitutional right of the owner of Chick-fil-a to have his religious beliefs and to be able to answer a question about those religious beliefs. The owner did NOTHING against gay people by answering the question.
The 'boycott Chic-fil-A' thing is absurd and intolerant. But whatever floats their boats ...
Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
Yeah, the truth of the matter is militant homosexuals are just bullies seeking to force people into submission, while claiming everyone has to tolerate them.
Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
Yeah, the truth of the matter is militant homosexuals are just bullies
Originally posted by crazydaysandnights
The media by and large has turned it into a Christian vs Liberal war because that is a good way to create drama.
I believe in respect, not tolerance. Tolerance is fake. But respect is something that is concrete. Respect people and treat people the way you want to be treated. But as we can all see, social conservatives don't do that with LGBT citizens. They treat LGBT citizens like trash. So they've earned every bit of backlash they are receiving.
Criticism isn't hate, though. Singing God Bless America as a means to bond in support of being anti-gay, and spitting in the foods of people perceived to be gay, is hate.
You're right, he isn't the only bigot, and other bigoted corporations/bigoted CEO's of corporations are also being boycotted.
Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
reply to post by Annee
You'd be surprised by how many there actually are.
But then again, you're one of the militant bullies, so I wouldn't really count on any fairness from you.
Originally posted by crazydaysandnights
WSJ is notably conservative, so I wouldn't really look to them for anything, due to their bias. Unlike WSJ, there is no bias in brand index scores. Now, I will agree, 6 months, and IMO more like 6-9 months rather than 3-6, we will see what the true impact is regarding the backlash against CFA. Personally, I think it's pretty clear the company has lost more consumers than they have gained, but the consumers of their product are, right now, extremely galvanized and supporting CFA strongly. But after this storyline runs it's course, these people will go back to their old routines for the most part. And that is when we'll see just how damaged CFA is. I don't think CFA will lose too much money out of their bottom line but they have definitely destroyed their chance at going national, and that alone means a loss of billions. Especially since liberals/gays have more disposable income, there is no doubt CFA has been impacted.
BTW, the YouGov brand index scores...........it wasn't a survey. And their methodology did not assume decline, what it does is it takes positive and negative feedback and weighs them together and comes up with the numbers. And what has happened is that there has been more negative than positive feedback regarding CFA since this entire drama began. That won't change, because NOW is when those supporting CFA are the most focused on the issue, the most supportive.
And everything I said about Wisconsin is true.
Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
reply to post by Annee
Baloney, you've attacked me quite often in these kinds of threads. It doesn't matter if I show you where you have or not, you will never admit you were wrong in doing so.
You also attack anybody who believes in God as well. You always do what you can to correct people because you and only you have all the right answers.
Again, another individual throwing out the tolerance BS. No-one in the LGBT community is seeking tolerance. I don't want tolerance. Tolerance is fake. Tolerance is disgust and hate disguised as love. Tolerance is disingenuous. So no, no-one is asking for tolerance, we are demanding equality and expecting respect and basic human decency. Since none of those things are coming our way from the other side, don't expect us to be nice. Those days have ended. We're not going to be nice to people who are against our community and our equality. Being anti-gay is wrong and if you choose to be anti-gay or defend anti-gay behavior, then you are opposed to the gay communities' best interest and not a friend nor ally.
Originally posted by Oldnslo
I agree and would like to add to this.
I also have no problems with gays or gay marriage. LGBT's have the right to be just as miserable as anyone in a traditional marriage. But I do have a problem with the LGBT's attempts to rectalize the issue whenever ANYTHING does not go their way. The LGBT's shout "tolerance" at the top of their lungs, but allow none in return.
Nope, you bigots have free speech. But so do we. Free speech cuts both ways. No-one is saying a bigot can't spew bigotry. But I can call them out on that bigotry accordingly, because that's what freedom of speech entails.
Freedom of Speech is a one way street where it's their way or the highway.
No-one cares what you buy. No-one cares what you think. Stop forcing your beliefs on me and my people, stop going out of your way to attack my community, and there won't be problems.
They want traditional Americans to "sit down and shut up", but we aren't buying that routine.
Actually, the message is the problem. Being anti-gay is the message, and being anti-gay is the problem. As for decorum, I'm pretty sure beating up LGBT people in hate crimes and saying marriage equality will lead to social destruction is NOT showing much class or civilized decency. You get what you give, and anti-gays sure aren't giving much of anything but garbage and hate.
At some point I would hope that some bit of decorum could be established and that can only happen when the "messengers" realize they are the problem, not the message.
There is nothing to discuss and I don't care to make friends. No-one is going to grovel to your people and kiss your ass to gain your acceptance. No-one gay/gay supportive cares what any of you think to that extent.
May I suggest this as a start to a fair and positive discussion of this "issue":
Step One
That's what it comes down to. You're either a true supporter or a fake friend. Guess we see where you stand.
Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
reply to post by stanguilles7
While I agree with you, that this guy is a bit of a jack-ass.....I think it's a bit wrong to lump all liberals in with this guy's behavior. I don't know of a single one of my lib friends that go around acting like this. Everyone I know that hates Chic-fil-A (including myself) are sending them a message in best most productive way possible...by not giving them any of our service!
It's not easy either.....Why do they have to make such damn good waffle fries!
Originally posted by InsideYourMind
I'm sorry, Looking at the replies to this video... is ATS some kind of gay-hate site aswell? (at least a majority of members seem to be).
What is wrong with voicing your opinion about a corporation's stance on discrimination and hate?
The dude did nothing wrong.
Coarse personalities? No. In fact, the opposite is true. We're extremely loyal friends and bubbly and fun to be around, in general more worldly and intelligent compared to the rest of society, more in touch with our emotions, and more real. But that's when we feel comfortable opening up to people, and are associating with people who are, you know, actually pro-gay.
Originally posted by BrutalDictator
Most of the gays I know have rather coarse personalities. They conceal it with a very thin veneer of "openness" with completely shallow and fake "friendliness", which is easily shattered by the slightest misperception that you may not be 1000% supportive of every aspect of every fallacy THEY hold dear....even if it's not part of your own traditional beliefs.
That's just how it is. They are a frail lot, but nature or by nurture, it can't be denied.