It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Ron Paul has stated he would not have voted for the Civil Rights Act back in the 60's.
So there you have it, the ultimate hypocricy. He can't turn around today and scream for his Civil Rights when he has been against giving them to you his entire professional career.
it's his personal view of not allowing the federal government how you have to live your life or run your business. he sticks to his guns. even though he doesn't agree with people who are racist he believes the federal government does not have the right to tell people how to run their lives or their business. but you probably already knew that.
, Paul said he objected to the Civil Rights Act because of its infringement on private property rights. He said that while he would favor repealing Jim Crow laws, the United States “would be better off” without government intruding on and policing personal lives. When Chris Matthews pressed the issue, asking if it should be legal for shop owners to not allow blacks, Paul responded, “That’s ancient history. That’s over and done with.”
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Ron Paul has stated he would not have voted for the Civil Rights Act back in the 60's.
So there you have it, the ultimate hypocricy. He can't turn around today and scream for his Civil Rights when he has been against giving them to you his entire professional career.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
Do they actually have a case?
I highly doubt it, as I have outlined here in this thread I made.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
HEHE it's not like I didn't see this coming.
Originally posted by gladtobehere
The Ron Paul army is marching on.
We're fighting for and WINNING the majority of state delegates in many states.
The Revolution WILL be televised.
Originally posted by RisenAngel77
Im surprised this didn't get more attention oO,Where is everyone?
2nd lineedit on 12-6-2012 by RisenAngel77 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by RisenAngel77
You know, I think that a law should be created making someone who's campaign practice leads to fraud in voting to be charged with treason. If found guilty they would be put to death. Especially if the fraud is enacted by a high government official. Maybe we could have eliminated a couple of past presidents by a law like this.
Originally posted by AckAckAttack34
Respectfully folks, there is really not a lot of good caselaw that supports filing and then prevailing in a lawsuit basically saying "I'm a candidate for public office, I'm running behind and I need the court to intervene and take judicial action to prevent me from losing an election". This move is simply a last ditch attempt for Team Ron Paul to try and free up a few more delegates to the Republican National Convention and that's all. And as far as the lawsuit goes, I would be shocked if any judge would even entertain the thought of interfering with a nomination process of a national presidential candidate by slapping a judicial order on it. The suits will get filed and the judges will either dismiss them outright or rule against them on the merits.
I'm sorry but to me this is a legal non-starter....
Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by TinfoilTP
Ron Paul has stated he would not have voted for the Civil Rights Act back in the 60's.
So there you have it, the ultimate hypocricy. He can't turn around today and scream for his Civil Rights when he has been against giving them to you his entire professional career.
Hmmmmm, so a person since making a decision in the 60's, has no room to grow and become a better person in the span of 50 years??? I certainly hope you have changed your views as you grew older and learned from your mistakes! Whoops! Maybe I am wrong! People like you were born perfect and your views NEVER change?????
I think your words pretty much prove why you are here!
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
This might actually be the smartest thing to come out of Ron Paul supporters' mouths all year!!!!
I respect their right to sue the government if they feel they were being treated unfairly, I hope this thread gets a lot of coverage over the next couple of months so I can keep track of the case.
However, the lack of posts on the thread is telling no? The movement is dead, even on ATS. I have also noticed little postings/actual news over at the dailypaul too!
Originally posted by eLPresidente
I love how all of the Ron Paul haters, still, to this day, comes out and hates on anything the Ron Paul movement tries to achieve even if its fighting election fraud.