NBC's Snyderman: "It's Pro-Science To Abort Children With Genetic Defects"

reply to post by Viesczy


Does fastest, smartest, etc..., include you? If not, you first.

Let's get rid of people...

Let's get rid of some of them, and some of those, oh, and let's not forget those folks over there... Get rid of 'em.

What, me? Oh, no, I'm much to important...

Who get's to decide? Who?

reply to post by seagull


They all like to talk a big game fueled by an overly inflated sense of self importance an and distorted perspective on their intelligence.

Lets move this into the twilight zone for a sec.... Take their intelligence (albeit questionable) and put it into their little baby self in their mommy's tummy. Then this benevolent voice tells them "YOURE NEVER GOING TO BE BORN BECAUSE YOU ARE ONE OF THE UNDESIREABLES" ...

I wonder if they would be hypocritical and make the argument for why they should live or be intellectually honest and agree why they should die.

reply to post by ideasarebulletproof

I don't really know what you just said. "Hella other one" ??

Whose forcing people to abort?

Killing the "wrong" babies by the government?

Sorry, that's far beyond the pale of paranoid for me.

switch your brain on, pal if insurance company has info about high probability of a future baby to get some kind of the disease, they will be very stubborn to not underwrite paper 4 this some kind

signature:
"The most merciful thing in the world I think is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents... some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality and of our frightful position therein that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age." — H.P. Lovecraft

Oh, Yea -- idiocy is really merciful thing

reply to post by SarK0Y


"stubborn to not underwrite paper 4 this some kind" Again... Is English not your first language? I have no idea what you are trying to say.

I guess you don't have the proper reading comprehension in regards to my signature, I would explain it to you but judging by your recent posts I highly doubt you would understand a word I'm saying.

reply to post by ideasarebulletproof

I guess you don't have the proper reading comprehension in regards to my signature, I would explain it to you but judging by your recent posts I highly doubt you would understand a word I'm saying.

pal, i have understood everything of ye but thou are about to have gotten into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age

Originally posted by SarK0Y
reply to post by ideasarebulletproof

 

I guess you don't have the proper reading comprehension in regards to my signature, I would explain it to you but judging by your recent posts I highly doubt you would understand a word I'm saying.

pal, i have understood everything of ye

but thou are about to have gotten into the peace and safety of a new Dark Age

"i have understood everything of ye" "thou are about to have gotten"

Sorry, I can't do this anymore. Have fun.

Why is the term "pro science" being used? i think it is funny that so many people bash science on the internet, that science built.

reply to post by Opfor


to erase "defected" ones ain't of Science, it's about new Sparta, Reich & other $hit like that