It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
9/11 broke the 300 year old Newtonian Physics record alright.
Since it is grade school physics
....there isn't much to do repeat the same old obvious against obviously stupid lies.
Our engineering schools can't build a collapsing model after TEN YEARS. Soon to be ELEVEN.
They would have to explain why they didn't solve it in ONE.
Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
reply to post by hooper
They didn't because that didn't happen. There were no exercises that day involving hijacked planes
really?
Norad exercize
I like the comment how it was only to test procedures....good testing it was. And good procedures also.
Please...please...don't quote how "it was for aircrafts originating from foreign airports" excuse 'cos it's pitiful. As if it matters from where the plane came...if it's on US air territory i don't see the difference.edit on 4-5-2012 by MarioOnTheFly because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by homervb
Oh I am very well aware of that. But then again with all these apparent "intelligence failures", there's no way he would know something of that detail if he had no clue a terrorist attack was imminent that day.
"When a transponder is turned off, several things happen to civilian (FAA) radar
screens that do not affect military radar. First, a small identifying symbol on the
blip on the controller’s radar screen goes out. Second, although the civilian ATC
still has the ability to track the aircraft in two dimensions, he or she is no longer
able to pinpoint its altitude. When an aircraft under
ATC control goes silent, the blip for that aircraft is instantaneously inserted in a
conspicuous manner on the screens of every other ATC in the region. Everybody
sees it." taken from Crossing The Rubicon.
Military radar can still fully track aircrafts when transponders are turned off. If there hadn't been all this confusion between the drills and real time, action could have been taken. The fighter who was out of the area running a drill (being directed by those behind the radar screen) could have been the fighter who was up in the air AT LEAST shadowing ONE of these aircrafts.
So you can totally take into consideration something you heard & what a fellow OS troop heard but you can't take anything into consideration anything I've said...wow.. Oh..and btw..
Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
Yeah...I'm highly suspicious of hoopers intentions. I have seen him a few times delibertely posting false info.
Originally posted by hooper
Now please show me where there were drills on 9/11 that involved hijacked planes. Not before 9/11 and not after 9/11 but ON 9/11.
And not just drills or exercises - those are going on all the time so there is no strange concidence that they were going on on 9/11.
Originally posted by DaTroof
Anyone with any sense would have targeted military complexes.
Just like the 1993 bombing, 9/11 was a false flag attack.
Did NORAD conduct exercises or develop scenarios, PRIOR to September 11, 2001, to test a military reaction to an aircraft hijacking which appeared destined to result in a suicide crash into a high-value target? If so, identify the five exercises conducted on, or immediately prior to September 11, 2001; include dates, participants, scenario, and synopsis of exercise results.
General Myers. Prior to September 11, 2001, NORAD exercises were not designed to exercise or develop procedures to shoot down civilian airliners. Pre-September 11 exercises were designed to practice command
and control procedures, rules of engagement, external agency coordination and hijack shadow and/or escort procedures. The following five exercise hijack events included a suicide crash into a high-value target. Synopses of exercise results are not available. They were discarded in accordance with DOD directives.
So why would hijackers crash planes into the twin towers anyway?,
Well surely you don't need such an elaborate plan to accomplish such terror or a death toll, flying planes into the towers isn't exactly logical.
Originally posted by hooper
No exercises being conducted on 9/11 involving hijaked commercial aircraft.
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by Insolubrious
Well surely you don't need such an elaborate plan to accomplish such terror or a death toll, flying planes into the towers isn't exactly logical.
I find the plan to quite simple.
A few buddies and a couple of box cutters.
No explosives to deal with.
Nothing illegal on your person.
Passengers were like sheep back then.
And you are assured 100+ deaths no matter what.
This may be the heart of the conspiracy mindeds problem. It was sooo simple as to be too simple to work. Therefore it couldn't be true.
Surely if it was real terrorists, they wouldn`t have hung in the air for the time they did in fear of being shot down.
.....what other reason would one crash planes into the towers except to take them down....
I`d say passengers are more like sheep now.
Wow.
You make it sound so Simple.
So simple that OSer`s would believe that theory.
I`d say passengers are more like sheep now.