It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rickymouse
An object the size of a baseball made of the right material could create a big mess if it hit it the right spot and wouldn't even slow down at all as it continued on it's path through the earth and back into space. A tiny particle of this was thought to have hit the earth not long ago and created earthquakes on opposite ends of the globe as it slowly entered and exited the planet.. I like reading all of this scientific crap from the scientists.
An object the size of a baseball made of the right material could create a big mess if it hit it the right spot and wouldn't even slow down at all as it continued on it's path through the earth and back into space. A tiny particle of this was thought to have hit the earth not long ago and created earthquakes on opposite ends of the globe as it slowly entered and exited the planet.. I like reading all of this scientific crap from the scientists.
The number of lay people is not important. The issue is how many people are bothering to look up.
Posting a hoax video was done for what purpose?
The number of lay people as opposed to people who have signed non-disclosure agreements is very important. If there are 4 million permanent residents in the Arctic (north pole) and there are 0 permanent residents in the Antarctic (south pole) - what does that mean? The south polers are being paid by their respective governments to look up. How many per capita non-disclosure agreements do you suppose there are among the south polers as opposed to the north polers?
Hoax video? Says who? I was looking for pictures from the Scott-Amundsen since your op is south pole centric and that's the first one I found. Everything's a hoax before it's 'officially' disclosed.
Originally posted by Flowmaster05
Originally posted by ngchunter
i41.tinypic.com...edit on 3-4-2012 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)
Forgive me for being an astronomy noob, but on the pic on the left, what do the three purple blobs surrounding the red blob mean?
Thanks for your time
I don't mind looking up five words in an article and reconstructing them to fit my knowledge,but a pile of them is just too much.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by ngchunter
Here...I found you some 'official' images from the SPT/South Pole Telescope - knock yourself out.
South Pole Telescope - images
Images are pseudo-color combinations of multiband data from the Blanco Cosmology Survey
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by stereologist
The number of lay people is not important. The issue is how many people are bothering to look up.
Ever heard of a non-disclosure agreement?
Hoax video? Says who?
Originally posted by Sailor Sam
Originally posted by stereologist
The entire 2012 thread is filled with many simple as well as complicated misunderstandings. Some of the misunderstandings deal with archaeological issues such as mixing Aztec with Mayan cultures or thinking that other cultures other than the Maya mention 2012.
Here I'd like to point out a recurring mistake concerning the South Pole. Countless threads and posts within threads suggest that it is possible to "sneak" up on the Earth by approaching directly at the South Pole.
It is unclear to me why no threads claim that the same can be done for the North Pole. Why can't an object apply the same trickery at the other end of the Earth?
Is it because there is a telescope at the South Pole and not one at the North pole?
You are obviously in the northern hemisphere and just because those of us living well south from the equator are considered to be living "down under" you assume that the south pole is the lowest part on earth and can be snuck up on from even lower areas of space.
Wrong!
I live at 37degrees south and can see the celelstial south pole every day and night when there is no cloud.
This celestial south pole is actually elevated at 37 degrees above the visible horizon, so I look UP at this celestial south pole.
You in the north cannot see it, just as I cannot see the celestial north pole, it is below the visible horizon
So far have not seen anything "sneak up" on us.edit on 1-4-2012 by Sailor Sam because: spelling
In May 2002, a group of researchers at Southern Methodist University reported the possibility that strangelets may have been responsible for seismic events recorded on October 22 and November 24 in 1993.[10] The authors later retracted their claim, after finding that the clock of one of the seismic stations had a large error during the relevant period.[11]
Simple, there are inhabited lands not so far from the north pole. But no one lives within 10,000+ miles of the south pole. If you do make the journey to antarctica, i doubt you would think about looking at the sky with a telescope there. So a somewhat plausible theory from a certain standpoint