It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by babybunnies
I would challenge ANYONE questioning this copy of the birth certificate to scan their own certificate and make available to the public in the same manner.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by babybunnies
I would challenge ANYONE questioning this copy of the birth certificate to scan their own certificate and make available to the public in the same manner.
This is the key problem I found with the investigation, none of them even bothered to do a comparitive analysis of other birth certificate images, of Hawaiian images. Apparently they just singled out Obama's one, found some digital irregularities that they believe to be inconsistent (without reviewing the tests on other Hawaiian birth certificates) and that's that.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
Let the SCOTUS take over and go through all of it.
Then give us a quick decision.
The Sheriff Joe Arpaio Posse has done enough.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
Let the SCOTUS take over and go through all of it.
Then give us a quick decision.
The Sheriff Joe Arpaio Posse has done enough.
Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. See United States v. Wong Kim Ark (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV) ; Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana (addressing the precise issue). Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett does not hold otherwise
I would challenge ANYONE questioning this copy of the birth certificate to scan their own certificate and make available to the public in the same manner.
Sherrif Joe, Donald Trump, Sarah Palin and any birther questioning the legitimacy of the scanned certificate should all produce their birth certificates in the same type of scan and put them forward for public scrutiny under the exact same circumstances.
I would think that similar "flaws" in their birth certificate scans would be found, as well.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
"Sheriff" Joe and his posse's so-called investigation is so fundamentally flawed, in that he never asked a single Adobe software representative or expert how their software works, he never spoke to anyone at the Hawaii Health Department, he never made a comparative analysis. All he did was copy an equally-flawed birther "analysis" of the BC.
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
Let the SCOTUS take over and go through all of it.
Then give us a quick decision.
The Sheriff Joe Arpaio Posse has done enough.
SCOTUS has looked at it and has dismissed every single lunatic piece of dribble about this. As for the good Sherriff, yes he's done enough. He needs to go back to his actual job instead of being a self-important oaf who dabbles in things that are none of his business.
Originally posted by OldCurmudgeon
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
Let the SCOTUS take over and go through all of it.
Then give us a quick decision.
The Sheriff Joe Arpaio Posse has done enough.
SCOTUS has looked at it and has dismissed every single lunatic piece of dribble about this. As for the good Sherriff, yes he's done enough. He needs to go back to his actual job instead of being a self-important oaf who dabbles in things that are none of his business.
Please present evidence to support your claim regarding SCOTUS and this issue... as a matter of fact, SCOTUS has NEVER considered or ruled on the phrase 'natural born citizen' regarding President Obama or any other potential President of VP.
en.wikipedia.org...
The natural-born-citizen clause has been mentioned in passing in several decisions of the United States Supreme Court and lower courts dealing with the question of eligibility for citizenship by birth, but the Supreme Court has never directly addressed the question of a specific presidential or vice-presidential candidate's eligibility as a natural-born citizen.
Originally posted by OldCurmudgeon
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
Let the SCOTUS take over and go through all of it.
Then give us a quick decision.
The Sheriff Joe Arpaio Posse has done enough.
SCOTUS has looked at it and has dismissed every single lunatic piece of dribble about this. As for the good Sherriff, yes he's done enough. He needs to go back to his actual job instead of being a self-important oaf who dabbles in things that are none of his business.
Please present evidence to support your claim regarding SCOTUS and this issue... as a matter of fact, SCOTUS has NEVER considered or ruled on the phrase 'natural born citizen' regarding President Obama or any other potential President of VP.
en.wikipedia.org...
The natural-born-citizen clause has been mentioned in passing in several decisions of the United States Supreme Court and lower courts dealing with the question of eligibility for citizenship by birth, but the Supreme Court has never directly addressed the question of a specific presidential or vice-presidential candidate's eligibility as a natural-born citizen.
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by OldCurmudgeon
The issue isn't an issue. The scotus won't rule because it's been defined and accepted by proxy decisions many times.
All the rulings wherein someone is born here to foreign parents and that enters into decision, have all gone one way for decades and decades.. Being born in America makes you American, unless your the kid if a diplomat or something. Obama was not an exception. He was just another kid born in America, who did something very American; he went from rags to riches to President.
If we had ANY sense we'd be bragging about what an amazing country we have, the land of opportunity, etc., instead of trying to rewrite decades of law to demonise our president, for a short term political boost.
Originally posted by OldCurmudgeon
The real question is, and everyone seems to dodge it, "IF" President Obama WAS born in Hawaii then he could be considered a NBC by 'right of birth'.
But what if he was NOT???,
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by OldCurmudgeon
The real question is, and everyone seems to dodge it, "IF" President Obama WAS born in Hawaii then he could be considered a NBC by 'right of birth'.
But what if he was NOT???,
There is no evidence whatsoever to show he was born anywhere but in Hawaii, only silly conspiracy theories not based on any reality.
Even poor Orly taitz is going into meltdown at the moment as she realises she will lost every silly court case she attempts!
The geographer Jared Diamond has calculated that if the application of jus soli since 1850 were abolished, 60% of Americans and 80% of Argentinians would lose their citizenship, and 25% of British and French.
Originally posted by reaxi0n
Originally posted by jam321
Obama all the way!!!!
Really, man?
Honest question, as a fellow service member....what intrigues you about Obama?
Do you enjoy that he continued us in Iraq 3 years longer than he said he would?
Do you like him cutting healthcare benefits for active duty and vets? What about the corporations? Why aren't their benefits getting cut? We always get the short end of the stick.
What entices you about all the lies he told us?
Do you enjoy that he's about to send our boys off to fight another war and die, just so we can spread our wonderful "democracy?"
These are honest questions because I have never met anyone from any branch - especially a Marine who supports Obama still.edit on 3-1-12 by reaxi0n because: added a line
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by anon72
The problem when you're arrogant (as in Obama's case) is that you constantly underestimate people. Intelligence is underestimated. Resources are underestimated. Abilities are underestimated.
To the validity of his birth certificate.
I've often looked at the whole contreversy with amusement. Now it's switched to skepticism.
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by OldCurmudgeon
[rolls eyes]
What if Reagan wasn't born in the US?
What a stupid question...
The ACTUAL fact is sir that the issue has been settled many many times because the law is CLEAR... if you are born in the US you are a natural born citizen...
Read up on Jus soli... that's the basis... it's not in any way controversial...
en.wikipedia.org...
The geographer Jared Diamond has calculated that if the application of jus soli since 1850 were abolished, 60% of Americans and 80% of Argentinians would lose their citizenship, and 25% of British and French.
edit on 10-3-2012 by captainnotsoobvious because: (no reason given)