Obama Defends Roe v. Wade As Way for ‘Our Daughters’ to Have Same Chance As Sons to ‘Fulfill T

Originally posted by Tw0Sides

Originally posted by Battleline
The idea that a president defends Roe V.Wade by using his daughters as examples for success by being able to lay anyone anytime and have lawfull access to getting rid of there mistakes speaks volums to this clowns mentality and lack of respect for his daughters and there moral standards.

Another epic fail by this failure of all failures, now he is using his kids on the campaign, you know the ones that were of limits to all others.

edit on 24-1-2012 by Battleline because: (no reason given)

As POTUS he is open for discussion, pro or con.

His wife makes a speech, she is open for discussion.

But to further your agenda , and bring his daughters into it, talking about his mentality and respect for his daughters,

edit on 24-1-2012 by Tw0Sides because: (no reason given)

There is my post, show me hate.

Im not American, so there goes your Liberal spiel

reply to post by Connector
"Our daughters also means Obama's daughters, why won't you admit that?

Its hell defending this clown............isian't it??
.

Obama is clearly speaking about women of the US as a whole= daughters

Same for men=sons

Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by arbiture

 

I don't want to support someone's sex life at all.....it doesn't have to be a either or choice...

I was responding to the idea that birth control made sense to fund in the interest of public health, since a quote was embedded before I posted my comment, and "reply to" was used I don't want to confuse points-of-view about the subject. But supporting someones sex life is not the same as dealing w/the fact people are going to have sex and I just want to deal w/the repercussions as practically, effectively, humanely, and cheaply as possible.

Originally posted by Tw0Sides

Originally posted by Tw0Sides

Originally posted by Battleline
The idea that a president defends Roe V.Wade by using his daughters as examples for success by being able to lay anyone anytime and have lawfull access to getting rid of there mistakes speaks volums to this clowns mentality and lack of respect for his daughters and there moral standards.

Another epic fail by this failure of all failures, now he is using his kids on the campaign, you know the ones that were of limits to all others.

edit on 24-1-2012 by Battleline because: (no reason given)

As POTUS he is open for discussion, pro or con.

His wife makes a speech, she is open for discussion.

But to further your agenda , and bring his daughters into it, talking about his mentality and respect for his daughters,

edit on 24-1-2012 by Tw0Sides because: (no reason given)

There is my post, show me hate.

Im not American, so there goes your Liberal spiel

So this is how you play the game, your full statement before you modified it and left it sort of endless read" you make me want to puck" a little bit of hate I'd say slick.

Look I know how hard it must be to defend this clown Obama but chill out and quit making a fool of your self, the man said what he said ............admit it.

Originally posted by Battleline
reply to post by Connector

 

"Our daughters also means Obama's daughters, why won't you admit that?

Its hell defending this clown............isian't it??
.

I did when I used the term " the nations"...that would include his daughters and all the rest + the sons, but not specifically his own daughters, as you originally argued. Are you that obtuse? And before you try and pigeon hole me, no I didn't vote for Obama, I'm just a fan of truth and honesty...as Bill O'Reilly would say( without the bias), "The No Spin Zone".

Originally posted by Tw0Sides
reply to post by Battleline

 

Two post up is what you wrote.

If lying is your style, you wear it well.

What a sore looser, I was just takeing "your "advice to reread the artical, where are you from slick, are they all as sore a looser as you.

Originally posted by Battleline

Originally posted by Tw0Sides
reply to post by Battleline

 

Two post up is what you wrote.

If lying is your style, you wear it well.

What a sore looser, I was just takeing "your "advice to reread the artical, where are you from slick, are they all as sore a looser as you.

You dragged me down to your level of stupid.
And beat me with experience.
Have a nice night sir.

Originally posted by Connector

Originally posted by Battleline
reply to post by Connector

 

"Our daughters also means Obama's daughters, why won't you admit that?

Its hell defending this clown............isian't it??
.

I did when I used the term " the nations"...that would include his daughters and all the rest + the sons, but not specifically his own daughters, as you originally argued. Are you that obtuse? And before you try and pigeon hole me, no I didn't vote for Obama, I'm just a fan of truth and honesty...as Bill O'Reilly would say, "The No Spin Zone".

edit on 24-1-2012 by Connector because: (no reason given)

"Not spacifically his own daughters" what does that mean ? he can talk about everyone else's children but his are some how above it all and specially different? your sure takeing the spin to a new level, O'Rilly would be proud.

Again I can only imagine how hard it is to defend this guy but its not worth make a fool of yourself there slick.

Originally posted by Battleline

Originally posted by Connector

Originally posted by Battleline
reply to post by Connector

 

"Our daughters also means Obama's daughters, why won't you admit that?

Its hell defending this clown............isian't it??
.

I did when I used the term " the nations"...that would include his daughters and all the rest + the sons, but not specifically his own daughters, as you originally argued. Are you that obtuse? And before you try and pigeon hole me, no I didn't vote for Obama, I'm just a fan of truth and honesty...as Bill O'Reilly would say, "The No Spin Zone".

edit on 24-1-2012 by Connector because: (no reason given)

"Not spacifically his own daughters" what does that mean ? he can talk about everyone else's children but his are some how above it all and specially different? your sure takeing the spin to a new level, O'Rilly would be proud.

Again I can only imagine how hard it is to defend this guy but its not worth make a fool of yourself there slick.

Is slick the new put down of the day in your world?

You have no reading comprehension or understanding of the english language, apparent by your posts....or your just drunk, partisan and feeling hateful.... bye bye

reply to post by Tw0Sides
Who is stupied? Its not experiance that wins when discussing something with someone that can't defend there position or the person there defending when all there discission is based on is spin.

The fact you altered a post and then went with it as if no one noticed says what level you are on .....................sir.

Originally posted by PaxVeritas
Abortion is a terrible thing. I've been through it and in a really UGLY way. The whole process is horrific and I wouldn't wish it on anyone.

I wouldn't either. And like You and Me - - its always there. It doesn't go away.

But I sure as hell would have been pissed - - - if I didn't have that Choice.

Originally posted by Connector

Originally posted by Battleline

Originally posted by Connector

Originally posted by Battleline
reply to post by Connector

 

"Our daughters also means Obama's daughters, why won't you admit that?

Its hell defending this clown............isian't it??
.

I did when I used the term " the nations"...that would include his daughters and all the rest + the sons, but not specifically his own daughters, as you originally argued. Are you that obtuse? And before you try and pigeon hole me, no I didn't vote for Obama, I'm just a fan of truth and honesty...as Bill O'Reilly would say, "The No Spin Zone".

edit on 24-1-2012 by Connector because: (no reason given)

"Not spacifically his own daughters" what does that mean ? he can talk about everyone else's children but his are some how above it all and specially different? your sure takeing the spin to a new level, O'Rilly would be proud.

Again I can only imagine how hard it is to defend this guy but its not worth make a fool of yourself there slick.

Is slick the new put down of the day in your world?

You have no reading comprehension or understanding of the english language, apparent by your posts....or your just drunk, partisan and feeling hateful.... bye bye

Ridicule and demeaning someone is always the way with people like you that lose a discussion or can't defend a guy like Obama.

You start off so confident and when you see that you have chose the wrong fight you end it with hate and anger. What a small person......................mentally I mean. SEE YA!!

Originally posted by woodwardjnr
Why are so many in America so keen to see the return of the dark days of back street abortions. I don't know anyone who says abortion is something to be celebrated, but if women are going to do it, it's best it's done in a safe environment.

# 1 reason - - Fundamental Christianity.

We can't blanket all Christians because many do understand Right of Choice.

I've also known a couple Atheists and Agnostics who are anti-abortion. Which is stupid IMO - - because they should understand Right of Choice.

Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by marg6043

 

Why in the name of heck should birth control be free? Why should tax payers flit the bill for people to screw their brains out????

If I had my way - - ALL birth control would be free. All contraceptives would be free. All abortions would be free. All Vasectomies would be free. All tubes tied would be free. Education in all areas of reproduction and child care would be free.

I'd charge triple for Viagra.

Did you know Viagra is covered by most insurance companies as a medical condition? But those same insurance companies do not cover birth control for women.

Originally posted by spiritualzombie
I think for as long as we live in a world that can find justification in the killing of innocents whether by war, or by animal slaughter, we just need to accept killing little babies in the womb is sometimes a necessary evil. Get over it.

Yeah - - lets starve them to death instead from lack of resources.

reply to post by Annee

Yes, let's make it all free.
As long as the doctors will perform it for free, I am ALL for it. As long as pharmaceutical companies will make the birth control pills free, I am ALL for it.
Otherwise, download a how to on abortion or PAY for someone to do it and dispose of him/her.
Ugly huh? No uglier than abortion, dear.

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Another thing which is rarely talked about, but due to the President's view that a young woman's life is ruined by an unwanted pregnancy, it seems relevant to note that there can be complications from the abortion procedure, and also emotional and psychological trauma after the procedure.

Speaking of Presidents - - one of the first things "W" did was stop all funding to all women's clinics abroad.

Of course we all know - - that women's clinics in 3rd world countries do nothing but push abortion.

Originally posted by Annee

Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by marg6043

 

Why in the name of heck should birth control be free? Why should tax payers flit the bill for people to screw their brains out????

If I had my way - - ALL birth control would be free. All contraceptives would be free. All abortions would be free. All Vasectomies would be free. All tubes tied would be free. Education in all areas of reproduction and child care would be free.

I'd charge triple for Viagra.

Did you know Viagra is covered by most insurance companies as a medical condition? But those same insurance companies do not cover birth control for women.

Starred and Quoted for excellent post ='s bumpage

#two

reply to post by Shadowalker


This is what he said: “As we mark the 39th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, we must remember that this Supreme Court decision not only protects a woman’s health and reproductive freedom, but also affirms a broader principle: that government should not intrude on private family matters,” Obama said. “I remain committed to protecting a woman’s right to choose and this fundamental constitutional right.

Heretic was right, leave it to the conservative right to word things in their favor. Also funny how conservatives/pro lifers are usually all for constitutional rights but not in this case.