It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skewed
I think teaching sex ed in kindergarten is a bit too early. However, I think it is a perfect time to start laying the foundation and fundamentals in order to adequately start teaching sex ed in their 4th/5th/6th grade years.
I would also like to say that the school systems should adopt a curriculum that also includes psychology and sociology.
Originally posted by xuenchen
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by xuenchen
Absolutely !
THIS is the job of the Parents .... NOBODY Else !
edit on Jan-18-2012 by xuenchen because:
What happens when the parents don't do their job?
The same thing as when the "teachers" don't do their jobs.
Take your choice.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
This would be a non-issue if people didnt feel this floormat compulsion to raise other peoples kids.
Let chlamydia and unwanted pregnancy run rampant. What do I care?
Likewise, if they cant fend for themselves dont do it for them.
Following "natures course" got them there. Let them follow "natures course" to its inevitable end.
When teachers don't do their jobs, parents can go to the school and demand action. What does the school do when parents aren't doing their job, i.e, properly educating their children regarding sex? Should they go to the parent's house and demand that they properly teach their child? How well do you think that would go over?
When teachers don't do their jobs, parents can go to the school and demand action.
What does the school do when parents aren't doing their job
Should they go to the parent's house and demand that they properly teach their child?
Originally posted by xuenchen
Originally posted by Skewed
I think teaching sex ed in kindergarten is a bit too early. However, I think it is a perfect time to start laying the foundation and fundamentals in order to adequately start teaching sex ed in their 4th/5th/6th grade years.
I would also like to say that the school systems should adopt a curriculum that also includes psychology and sociology.
What about the "qualifications" and "credentials" of the "teachers" ?
Too many sick-o's are attracted to the system.
ITs the Parents Job
I'm all for sexual/social education starting from and early age and continuing through graduation from high school.
A number of European countries aren't such repressive prudes, and do to progressive sexual education from a young age continuing on until graduation, children learn from a young age the importance of interpersonal communications.
You find in all countries that have progressive ongoing sexual education all through a child's schooling that crimes involving rape, sexual abuse, domestic violence, murders over jealousy, and other such, are FAR less, from a percentage comparison, astoundingly so.
Repressive, prudish countries that get all in a tizzy if woman so much as has a nip slip, well, you'll find those places lead the world in sex crimes, abuse, domestic violence, and other such.
Places where kids know what sex is, as well as appropriate behavior in interpersonal relations are quite the bit wiser about the world and if a priest, or some other kind of perv attempts to lure them into a compromising situation, well, a savvy kid will know what's up, and not be so naive, nor let themselves be victimized.
Turn sex into something taboo, dirty, awkward, and kid just might be too embarrassed, or reluctant to talk about someone taking advantage of them. A huge number of cases where abuse has occurred go unreported because of this social repression about the subject.
Originally posted by daryllyn
Example:
'Mommy... where do babies come from?'
'They grow in the mommy's belly and when they are big enough, the doctor takes them out.'
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
This would be a non-issue if people didnt feel this floormat compulsion to raise other peoples kids.
Let chlamydia and unwanted pregnancy run rampant. What do I care?
Likewise, if they cant fend for themselves dont do it for them.
Following "natures course" got them there. Let them follow "natures course" to its inevitable end.
Originally posted by xuenchen
Keep in mind the article content is primarilyfixated onfocused on "sexual orientation",
with a misleading headline
Ninety-three percent of parents of junior high school students and 91 percent of parents of high school students
believe it is very or somewhat important to have sexuality education as part of the school curriculum.
Ninety-five percent of parents of junior high school students and 93 percent of parents of high school
students believe that birth control and other methods of preventing pregnancy are appropriate topics for
sexuality education programs in schools.
Approximately 75 percent of parents believed that the topic of sexual orientation should be included in
sexuality education programs and “discussed in a way that provides a fair and balanced presentation of the
facts and different views in society.”
Eighty-eight percent of parents of junior high school students and 85 percent of parents of high school students believe information on how to use and where to get contraceptives is an appropriate topic for sexuality
education programs in schools.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
This would be a non-issue if people didnt feel this floormat compulsion to raise other peoples kids.
Let chlamydia and unwanted pregnancy run rampant. What do I care?
Likewise, if they cant fend for themselves dont do it for them.
Following "natures course" got them there. Let them follow "natures course" to its inevitable end.
What a great idea. Why don't we let parents do whatever they want with their own children. Starve them, rape them, beat them. What do we care how their children turn out? What do we care if we have a nation full of diseases, abortions, unwanted children in orphanages, etc., etc.? Niiiiiice.
What a great idea. Why don't we let parents do whatever they want with their own children. Starve them, rape them, beat them. What do we care how their children turn out? What do we care if we have a nation full of diseases, abortions, unwanted children in orphanages, etc., etc.? Niiiiiice.
Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by nineix
I'm all for sexual/social education starting from and early age and continuing through graduation from high school.
A number of European countries aren't such repressive prudes, and do to progressive sexual education from a young age continuing on until graduation, children learn from a young age the importance of interpersonal communications.
You find in all countries that have progressive ongoing sexual education all through a child's schooling that crimes involving rape, sexual abuse, domestic violence, murders over jealousy, and other such, are FAR less, from a percentage comparison, astoundingly so.
Repressive, prudish countries that get all in a tizzy if woman so much as has a nip slip, well, you'll find those places lead the world in sex crimes, abuse, domestic violence, and other such.
Places where kids know what sex is, as well as appropriate behavior in interpersonal relations are quite the bit wiser about the world and if a priest, or some other kind of perv attempts to lure them into a compromising situation, well, a savvy kid will know what's up, and not be so naive, nor let themselves be victimized.
Turn sex into something taboo, dirty, awkward, and kid just might be too embarrassed, or reluctant to talk about someone taking advantage of them. A huge number of cases where abuse has occurred go unreported because of this social repression about the subject.
Some real time stats and links might help your argument.
And a list of "prudish" countries would be enlightening too.
Keep in mind the article content is primarilyfixated onfocused on "sexual orientation",
with a misleading headline
I hope sexual orientation is not the main agenda of sex education
edit on Jan-18-2012 by xuenchen because: (no reason given)edit on Jan-18-2012 by xuenchen because: added quote update/edits
Originally posted by xuenchen
The majority will educate their own kids successfully.
The sex ed programs have been around for a while now in many forms.
Look at the results.
The article's title is misleading all right.
The education about sexuality doesn't come till later. And I support a thorough education. If you want to teach prejudice, you can do that at home.
“Ideally, comprehensive sexuality education should start in kindergarten and continue through 12th grade,” says the “National Sexuality Education Standards” report, drawn up by a range of advocates, academics and public education officials.
I know you don't want the facts to get in the way of your outrage, but I feel I must put them out here.
The people of this country WANT this education for their children. If you don't, then put yours in private schools
Bullying of gay kids and kids with gay family members has gotten out of hand with the education parents are giving their kids. Let the school do it if the parents are doing such a suck job.
Originally posted by Skewed
Some of the problems discussed here are societal problems and if society starts acting right some things will rightfully fix themselves without any intervention.
Originally posted by xuenchen
The majority will educate their own kids successfully.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Bullying of gay kids and kids with gay family members has gotten out of hand with the education parents are giving their kids. Let the school do it if the parents are doing such a suck job.edit on 1/18/2012 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xuenchen
It's still a free country.
The majority will educate their own kids successfully.
The sex ed programs have been around for a while now in many forms.
Look at the results.
The US has one of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the industrialized world. Each year in the US,
more than 750,000 women ages 15–19 become pregnant, with more than 80 percent of these pregnancies unintended.
Furthermore, while young people in the US ages 15–25 make up only one-quarter of the sexually active
population, they contract about half of the 19 million sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) annually. This equates to one in four sexually active teenagers contracting a sexually transmitted disease each year.
And young people ages 13–29 account for about one-third of the estimated 50,000
new HIV infections each year, the largest share of any age group.
According to the 2009 National School Climate Survey, nearly 9 out of 10 lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) students reported being harassed in the previous year. Two-thirds of LGBT students reported feeling unsafe and nearly one-third skipped at least one day of school because of concerns about their personal safety. LGBT students who reported frequent harassment also suffered from lower grade point averages.