It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThrowCatsAtCacti
reply to post by Cassius666
Of course they should, but how can they when our 'governments' are owned by the people who control the money.
Originally posted by GoldenRuled
Looking at the last 100 years as the government has gotten more and more control over financial markets
Originally posted by pierregustavetoutant
Governments should have absolutely nothing to do with markets.
Government involvement in the economy is what got us where we are in the first place.
Originally posted by TupacShakur
reply to post by Cassius666
The lack of regulations is what caused the financial collapse, so I say yes. If there were strict regulations in place, the insane business practices that ended up collapsing the economy would have been flagged long ago. But instead, they were allowed to sell those credit default swaps, derivatives, and all of that fun stuff.
But this could also pose a problem. Since our government is currently corrupted and hijacked by bankers and other wealthy elites, they can put people in place to push their agenda. This is reflected pretty clearly by the 11 Goldman Sachs employees that Obama appointed to his Administration.
So if they can have people write the regulations, they can find ways around it. They can rig the system while making it appear that they're playing by the rules. And that's arguably what they did, Obama talked about Wall Street greed and corruption causing the financial collapse, but his regulations really didn't do anything substantial.