Nessie standing on bottom of lake (very cool photo)

I traced the contours of nessi, and it appears as if she is standing on the bottom of the lake.
I couldn't trace the back flipper because it was too dark.
In no way am I saying my tracing is 100% accurate.


uploadpic.org...

?

Would you happen to have a copy of the original so we can compare this to?

Originally posted by ohyouknow
Would you happen to have a copy of the original so we can compare this to?

It's in the "photographic evidence of an alternative history" pdf file

Originally posted by Sorgmodig
I traced the contours of nessi, and it appears as if she is standing on the bottom of the lake.
I couldn't trace the back flipper because it was too dark.
In no way am I saying my tracing is 100% accurate.


uploadpic.org...

?

edit on 27-11-2011 by Sorgmodig because: (no reason given)

My God, I do like this.
30 years ago I had an idea to find the Nessy's.
The idea:
Lower an underwater microphone that can record sub-sonic sounds.
Record all sounds in a variety of spots.
Select the strange sounds.
Now lower an underwater loudspeaker that fits this frequencies.
Play the signal back.
The Nessy's will not hear them selves, they hear colleagues and will be forced to react.

It works wit rare birds, why not with Nessy's.

Originally posted by Sorgmodig

Originally posted by ohyouknow
Would you happen to have a copy of the original so we can compare this to?

It's in the "photographic evidence of an alternative history" pdf file

so dont you think that you should have given us the link to the PDF ?

could you please give it to us ? thanx

Originally posted by Dr UAE

Originally posted by Sorgmodig

Originally posted by ohyouknow
Would you happen to have a copy of the original so we can compare this to?

It's in the "photographic evidence of an alternative history" pdf file

so dont you think that you should have given us the link to the PDF ?

could you please give it to us ? thanx

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Man, way to make it hard for us, you show us a pic and then a link to another thread where we have to get a PDF file and then we have to search that too...

Originally posted by roughycannon
Man, way to make it hard for us, you show us a pic and then a link to another thread where we have to get a PDF file and then we have to search that too...

What? Just click the link and the pdf will show in your web browser? Is that hard? But, ok. I can extract the picture. Hang on a second...

I think the OP had assumed most who are intrigued by this post would already have the pdf archived lol i have it saved to my desktop for easy reference ... but to be fair OP included appropriate links for others ... makes it a bit easier ... but ive been waiting patiently for years for real hard evidence to prove the existence of plesiosaurs

uploadpic.org...

There you go!

Also, I had written the name of the researcher on the photograph so googluing it would find the picture.

www.google.se... pl=229l3561l0l5353l16l15l2l8l9l0l213l849l0.4.1l5l0

Alos, her is a very nice drawing! You can see the flipper looks the same!
www.pbs.org...

Here is a peiosaur. The neck is longer...
3.bp.blogspot.com...

www.mysterycasebook.com...
Found this page that shows it, with some info, listed as 1972, I thought it had been shown to be a log or branch. ?

Originally posted by Sorgmodig
I traced the contours of nessi, and it appears as if she is standing on the bottom of the lake.
I couldn't trace the back flipper because it was too dark.
In no way am I saying my tracing is 100% accurate.


uploadpic.org...

?

edit on 27-11-2011 by Sorgmodig because: (no reason given)

I've seen the original photo of this many times before, and this "enhanced" image is not even close. I'm not saying that the original is a bad photo, but this one just suggests way too much that isn't even in the original.

In fact, if I recall correctly, the original photo was taken from the above the object, not in front of it.

This old photo was the most impressive that I've ever seen, even though it too is not all that conclusive:

Can I ask if Nessie lives forever?

It is just that these rumours have been around forever - and as Nessie does not seem to have a mate, there are no offspring.

Originally posted by catwhoknowsplusone
Can I ask if Nessie lives forever?

It is just that these rumours have been around forever - and as Nessie does not seem to have a mate, there are no offspring.

Who says there aren't multiple Nessie creatures, including offspring?

(PS I accidently starred your post when I meant to quote it. Lucky you )

reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi


Hi Dim,

Like I care about stars?

There has always only been one Nessie - since about 1800.

"Och aye, man, it be a Scottish myth".

Originally posted by catwhoknowsplusone
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi

 

Hi Dim,

Like I care about stars?

There has always only been one Nessie - since about 1800.

"Och aye, man, it be a Scottish myth".

Again, how can anyone know that there is only one Nessie? We barely know anything about such creatures, hence why this is cryptozoology and not biology.

I can tell you about Ogopogo since I've been to Lake Okanagan before and I know the stories about it. There's supposed to be a nest in an underwater cavern under a specific point in the lake, and divers are afraid to go near that spot. I've also heard from friends that a few times on local news they've discovered "baby" ogopogos, being eel-like creatures, though I have yet to ever see this myself (and I have looked). Perhaps it would hurt tourism if the mystery was blatently discovered. Just saying.

But I must digress in the case of Nessie, since it has turned into a "celebrity status" affair. I trust the older folklore that has survived the ages more than modern claims (the same can be said for Ogopogo too, since the natives knew it far better than us settlers).

Heres a link if you want to do a 24hr watch on the loch.


www.lochness.co.uk...

Originally posted by Pokoia

Originally posted by Sorgmodig
I traced the contours of nessi, and it appears as if she is standing on the bottom of the lake.
I couldn't trace the back flipper because it was too dark.
In no way am I saying my tracing is 100% accurate.


uploadpic.org...

?

edit on 27-11-2011 by Sorgmodig because: (no reason given)

My God, I do like this.
30 years ago I had an idea to find the Nessy's.
The idea:
Lower an underwater microphone that can record sub-sonic sounds.
Record all sounds in a variety of spots.
Select the strange sounds.
Now lower an underwater loudspeaker that fits this frequencies.
Play the signal back.
The Nessy's will not hear them selves, they hear colleagues and will be forced to react.

It works wit rare birds, why not with Nessy's.

I swear not just two weeks ago I watched a show where they were trying to find another lake monster and thats exactly what they did?

reply to post by catwhoknowsplusone

There has always only been one Nessie - since about 1800.

It may well be that only one has been seen on any given occasion, but to infer that only one exists is simply illogical.

"Och aye, man, it be a Scottish myth".

Another unequivocal statement that appears to belie a closed mind. Unless you are in possession of all the facts concerning all the sightings at all times and of all the conclusions of all the research you ought to be a little more circumspect.

You might like to start scratching the surface here:

Loch Ness monster might actually exist

(Sample evidence: "...three strong sonar contacts, larger than would be expected from a freshwater loch... all the contacts were larger than a shark but smaller than a whale...")

Reality can prove stranger than fiction. Even where proving it conclusively proves elusive.

Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi

Originally posted by Sorgmodig
I traced the contours of nessi, and it appears as if she is standing on the bottom of the lake.
I couldn't trace the back flipper because it was too dark.
In no way am I saying my tracing is 100% accurate.


uploadpic.org...

?

edit on 27-11-2011 by Sorgmodig because: (no reason given)

I've seen the original photo of this many times before, and this "enhanced" image is not even close. I'm not saying that the original is a bad photo, but this one just suggests way too much that isn't even in the original.

In fact, if I recall correctly, the original photo was taken from the above the object, not in front of it.

This old photo was the most impressive that I've ever seen, even though it too is not all that conclusive:

edit on 28-11-2011 by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi because: (no reason given)

Yes, maybe that is correct.