It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
• Consumer Confidence and Sentiment Sink to Levels Never Seen Outside of the Worst Recessions
• No Economic Recovery Is in Place or in the Works
• Third-Quarter GDP Gain Not Statistically Meaningful
• GDP Nonsense: Consumption Surged 1.7% While Disposable Income Collapsed 1.7%?
Early each month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) of the U.S. Department of Labor announces the total number of employed and unemployed persons in the United States for the previous month, along with many characteristics of such persons. These figures, particularly the unemployment rate—which tells you the percent of the labor force that is unemployed—receive wide coverage in the media.
Some people think that to get these figures on unemployment, the Government uses the number of persons filing claims for unemployment insurance (UI) benefits under State or Federal Government programs. But some people are still jobless when their benefits run out, and many more are not eligible at all or delay or never apply for benefits. So, quite clearly, UI information cannot be used as a source for complete information on the number of unemployed.
Other people think that the Government counts every unemployed person each month. To do this, every home in the country would have to be contacted—just as in the population census every 10 years. This procedure would cost way too much and take far too long. Besides, people would soon grow tired of having a census taker come to their homes every month, year after year, to ask about job-related activities.
Because unemployment insurance records relate only to persons who have applied for such benefits, and since it is impractical to actually count every unemployed person each month, the Government conducts a monthly sample survey called the Current Population Survey (CPS) to measure the extent of unemployment in the country. The CPS has been conducted in the United States every month since 1940, when it began as a Work Projects Administration project. It has been expanded and modified several times since then. For instance, beginning in 1994, the CPS estimates reflect the results of a major redesign of the survey. (For more information on the CPS redesign, see Chapter 1, "Labor Force Data Derived from the Current Population Survey," in the BLS Handbook of Methods.)
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman
I didn't link anything in the OP.
The numbers I'm citing were released this morning by the BLS.edit on 4-11-2011 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by GoalPoster
Optimism certainly isn't a trait typically found on ATS.
These numbers show a potentiality for improvement in the near future.
Which is being reflected in the numbers seen this morning:
www.shadowstats.com...edit on 4-11-2011 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman
Seems to me like there's plenty of people on ATS reacting and not reading.edit on 4-11-2011 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by CherubBaby
I'm just trying to be a little positive here.
Things have sucked for way too long now and I was rather excited to hear this news this morning.
I want America back to work and kicking economic ass again.
Originally posted by projectvxn
I swear ATS wouldn't be ATS if the unemployment rate were down.
ATS needs high unemployment, a comet heading toward Earth, a zombie apocalypse, aliens probing your butt, and HAARP to spill your morning coffee.
Doom is like crack around here.
Originally posted by Dr Love
reply to post by projectvxn
Sorry pal, not buying it. The numbers are so fudged that I really can't believe any source that tells me what the unemployment rate is anymore.
Based on the number of people coming into my office to get their "looking for a job" thing signed, it's about doubled in the last six months.
Peace
edit on 4-11-2011 by Dr Love because: (no reason given)