It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ma'am, I said nothing about 'editing,' nor did I say anything was changed.
Good sir do not accuse me of editing my post after you responded... Respectfully do not make a false accusation...
Originally posted by [color=D0E8BC]ripcontrol
[color=D0E8BC]by law the females should be tried for the same thing the guy is....
so they should both be charged for the same thing he is plus what they did..
Originally posted by [color=C5E8E5]BrokenCircles
[color=C5E8E5]yeah. She should be charged with bashing in her own skull. That's logical.... [color=7D7D7D]/Sarcasm
What you are actually saying here is, [color=D0E8BC]"she should be charged for bashing in her own skull, because of a single accusation about the possibility of a counterfeit bill."
Originally posted by [color=D0E8BC]ripcontrol
..[color=D0E8BC]yes she should
It is established the following
Employee went to check fifty ( theft of services, attempting counterfeiting- which translate to a higher crime of robbery...)
That would be a matter of opinion. Mine differs from yours. I didn't see a man who was trying to de-escalate a situation, by walking away. What I saw was a man who was going into the back to grab a weapon, before returning to the front area of the store.
at this point note that the man tried to de-esculate the situation... he walked away...
You're backwards.
Your strawman argument...
A single accusation from 1 person only, and nothing more.
The male checked the fifty(On the tape)
no outcome on the counterfeiting-(he checked the 50)
There was no attempt. Moved right on past the register.
Robbery attempt
They jumped over the counter by the register(failed robbery)
Physical contact? Yes.
Legally the battery is the act that started the whole thing... the other acts are a result of the battery... by LAW the two female perps are responsible for everything that happened... they are classified as the initiators.....
no matter your opinion on the robbery they slapped the employee first... they established physical contact with an act of battery...
You assume too much.
you can not brush these facts into the trash can because you do not like the fact a person defended themselves...
Are you stupid!? Have you seen these "women". These wannabe MEN thought they could pull off a smack down by jumping over the counter. GAME ON! It's doesn't matter who it is, try putting the hurt on someone and somebody could die. I feel bad for this poor guy. Sure he went to prison, but he's working! Those two idiots who got their asses kick are probably welfare queens. Expect a lawsuit. Should have killed the two bitches. Employee of the month for sure. Give that man a raise!
Originally posted by choppedbrisket
I wish that had been two men attacking the guy.
But it wasn't.
You can't just brutally beat down women.
I guess after 10 years in prison and 1 1/2 years of working at McDonalds he finally snapped.
I'm sure given his criminal record he will be going back in the clink.
The women did begin the sequence of combat though.
Don't tell me what to do.
first please embed the videos
Is this↑ a question [color=FF7154]????
is this your video...
No you don't. You're not even trying.
I want to make sure I understand it Ma'am
Did I say any of that? Nope.
If someone attacks you ma'am you feel you are not allowed to defend yourself
the people who attacked him should have been allowed to follow him to the back and do what ever they wanted to him...
An irrelevant 'what if.'
Would you feel different if it was two guys and a girl did this?
[color=FC8332]BINGO!!!!
(of note those same coworkers just stood there when they jumped over the counter ...)
Your assumptions are moronic.
Your logic seems demented...
I didn't say "He hit the other employees."
He did not hit the other employee's what are you talking about...
I can't help you with that. Your sentence structure is flawed.
Please explain this to me...
Or is your opinion based on the fact he paid his debt to society... but you believe he is violent period?
Once again- Did I say that? Nope.
I can not comprehend your point of view... you believe that when someone attacks you you should just take it?
I am sure that he does know something.
I would be questioning that other employee who backed away during filming... He knows something...