It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by proximo
Originally posted by AliceBlackman
reply to post by proximo
for comparative purposes we should stip out the interest payments on the debt inherited by both glorious leaders to see the real picture of their out of control spending.....
OK - as you will see that is really not very different between administrations due the Fed keeping the interest rate artificially low
Interest expense per year
2011 492 billion - Estimate
2010 $413,954,825,362.17
2009 $383,071,060,815.42
AVERAGE 429.6 billion
2008 $451,154,049,950.63
2007 $429,977,998,108.20
2006 $405,872,109,315.83
2005 $352,350,252,507.90
2004 $321,566,323,971.29
2003 $318,148,529,151.51
2002 $332,536,958,599.42
2001 $359,507,635,242.4
Average 371 billion
If it makes you feel better take off the 60 billion per year off Obama's deficit, and take another 100 billion off for inflation
He is still running deficits more than 500% higher than Bush
edit on 7-8-2011 by proximo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CaptainIraq
What's happened to ATS? Why are we arguing with each other when we all really want the same thing? Have we all forgotten that NEITHER Democrats or Republicans that we voted for really give two ****s about us?
If you look at things honestly and objectively, pretty much every president/administration/congress for the past 30 years or so is equally responsible for the mess we're in right now. Why?
Oh yeah, because what we think of as "Democracy" is these days nothing more than cleverly disguised Plutocracy.
Money = Power.
Originally posted by Evil_Santa
The people that keep pointing their finger at Obama and saying this is his fault, need only look at the differences in spending increases.
Obama's spending increases have only been at 9% of the GDP
Bush's were at 20% of the GDP.
Originally posted by lost artistic
reply to post by macman
There is no doubht that we all knew this had to happen at some point.
Why is it that americans suddently are getting suprised about this money crisis. The rest of the world has been playing by the boring rules. Yes i know, not all countries, but many of us. And we all saw USA become America.
In the 90s all i knew about the US was that the president had grey hair and always was a republican, strange enough.. But i had respect for the Republicans because it seemed like economy was they're thing. And in a country where money is power it would be logical that the goverment was just alike.
But in the recent years this has changed in looks and politics, but the spending has been going up the last 20 years. First a gently slope and then full burst to the top.
You don't deserve it. Because it is bad. And we don't deserve it. Definently!
But yet again we're gonna ride the economic crazy ride because the politicians on both sides don't put their future to the side and take that responsibility they have. Wich one of them is your crazy tax system that is WAY off!.
Stop talking about socialism, its not real. I live in Norway and i live well.
I not just live well but get the treatement i need. Yes there is queue in many health related situations, But not even close to the US situation. We have a oil fund, but never use more than 4 % of oil money on the budget. In some years we will be independent from the oil and will then know that we can stand the future when the oil is gone.
This does not seem to be the situation in the US.
Just take this situation and make some noise so the politicians change your budget. You don't need to be the world police anymore. Actually, we never really asked...
We love yout country and much of your culture, but these days its like having bush as the population.
I know you have different views, but have you seen what the majority of the american voice has said out to the rest of the world?
I mean. Does the word Somalia ring a bell? Hama? Syria unrest? Italy with its 8th rank on world largest economy. If they fall.Well then hell is loose. And the EU don't have the money....
It suck to say it but it feels #ty having to be affected by your economy over and over again just because someone don't want to pay that extra it takes. And its not even that much.. Not a huge country, but many people.
And by the way... We pay 11 dollar per gallons while you pay around 4 dollars?? Its just crazy. The difference is that we pay a # load to the goverment.
So just fix it this time.
Remember that if you all cut down the usage of ice with one third you will be energy independent again...
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by NOTurTypical
The housing bubble burst in 2006. That added to the problem, but the Bush recession started in 2002.
"Trickle down" economics do not work as stated. Supply-side is as much a myth as Jonah and the Whale, and you have to be absolutely deluded to believe in either. Stop hitting yourself, and open the door to reality.
Originally posted by proximo
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by beezzer
Beezzer, that is unquestionably the stupidest thing I have ever seen you say. Ever. And let's be fair, you've given yourself a lot of competition in this regards. You've just triumphed over yourself, and to be frank, i'm kind of looking on in awe. Your statement here was so utterly ridiculous that it went all the way around and became wildly impressive.
So bravo.
I think that if you look up facts, you'll see that the current administration's spending is about 1/8 that of the former Bush administration's. Granted, Obama's only had three years to Bush's eight, but if things remain constant, he'll still end up having spent less.
Yes, it #ing IS the Republicans' fault, and more to the point, it's YOUR fault for voting for the useless bastards.edit on 6/8/2011 by TheWalkingFox because: (no reason given)
OK this is SO incredibly WRONG, and you obviously won't look up the statistics for yourself - so here you go buddy.
BUSH YEARS
Year Total Federal Spending Deficit
2001 1.863Trillion -127 billion
2002 2.011 Trillion 158 billion
2003 2.160 Trillion 377 billion
2004 2.293 Trillion 412 billion
2005 2.472 Trillion 318 billion
2006 2.655 Trillion 248 billion
2007 2.729 Trillion 160 billion
2008 2.983 Trillion 458 billion
TOTALS 19.166 Trillion 2.004 Trillion
AVERAGES 2.397 Trillion 250 billion
OBAMA YEARS
Year Total Federal Spending Deficit
2009 3.5 Trillion 1.412 Trillion
2010 3.5 Trillion 1.293 Trillion
2011 3.8 Trillion 1.645 Trillion
TOTALS 10.8 Trillion 4.35 Trillion
AVERAGES 3.6 Trillion 1.45 Trillion
So that means the Obama administration has spent 150% of the bush administration per year, and it has run deficits 580% !! higher per year
Obama has not spent 1/8 (12.5 %) as much as the Bush administration. His administration has spent 56% of the Bush total in just 3 years.
Instead of just listening to left wing propaganda try actually looking up the statistics, it will make you look far less foolish.
edit on 7-8-2011 by proximo because: Fixed formatingedit on 7-8-2011 by proximo because: (no reason given)edit on 7-8-2011 by proximo because: Fixed typo for 2003edit on 7-8-2011 by proximo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by professornurbs
Yup. 'Course. What's wrong with our state of affairs that that many people need assistance just to get food on the table?
Does it bother those on the right that your only solution is to end the program and let these folks go hungry?
Originally posted by SyphonX
What an utterly worthless thread of bickering and idiocy.
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
So today I wake up to read about the downgrade in our credit rating...
www.cnn.com...
And I was very surprised to read the following
"The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government's medium-term debt dynamics," S&P said Friday shortly after markets closed.
So the S&P and other credit rating agencies sit in judgement of our congress... so there IS in effect a Global Test...
Now the representative from the S&P goes on to point out specifically one of the issues that greatly contributed to the downgrade.. and it's the Bush Tax cuts...
He pointed to the decision by Congress about whether to extend the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts as one crucial area. "If you let them lapse for the high-income earners, that could give you another $950 billion," he said.
You see Republicans... we do NOT live in a vacuum where we can do whatever we want... there IS a global test... one that we are now very painfully aware of....
Hopefully moving forward we will realize that there are consequences to our actions in the eyes of those who judge us and have the power to make that judgement a global and economic reality.
And for those who still believe it's Obamas policies... listen to what the S&P says..
Asked who was to blame, Chambers said, "This is a problem that's been a long time in the making -- well over this administration, the prior administration."edit on 6-8-2011 by HunkaHunka because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
reply to post by beezzer
Evidently you didn't read the words of the guy from S&P... he clearly stated the reasons... and they weren't Obamas policies...
He pointed to the decision by Congress about whether to extend the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts as one crucial area. "If you let them lapse for the high-income earners, that could give you another $950 billion," he said.
You really should read the full OP and reflect before postingedit on 6-8-2011 by HunkaHunka because: (no reason given)
Eliminate many of these entitlement programs.