It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by 1MrsJesusChrist
You wrote:
["they should know the difference between A Male and A Female and Why GOD made Adam and Eve and like All Things that come from Heaven, Universe Etc, are like stars or indivdual snowflakes and loved. They also need to be taught why they should honor both their father AND mother and not one over the other. Especially if you didnt know your father and he never claimed you as his own and She raised you alone, sacrificed Her life so you could be born and made you 1st or Her top priority be given More Glory."]
In other words....you want to re-introduce the preaching-variety of religious indoctrination. And let me guess, on the grounds of its being: "True, because it's true".
Which is NOT the case; it's false. The REAL 'god' is the great noodle-master and messiah/prophet is the flying spaghetti monster. But pastafarians are liberal, and don't insist on some self-appointed groups' elitist rights to make propaganda in public education systems.
Originally posted by bogomil
Maybe it would be a good idea to request national flying spaghetti monster holidays.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by 1MrsJesusChrist
Well frankly I think that is Unfortunate because; you give the kids time off but they dont know why? I is wrong to take Christ out of Christmas, and that's just as wrong; as calling things; spring break instead of the Soltice, Easter, Passover, etc.
It is wrong for the government to have official religious holidays. Especially since they are exclusively Christian holidays. They would never get away with that today.
However - undoing something is not so easy.
It is up to parents to teach their kids whatever god belief or non belief they want. It is definitely not up to schools to recognize it.
A neutral name for these breaks is the ONLY correct thing to do.
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by 1MrsJesusChrist
You wrote:
["but We should be allowed to have a GOD We Trust and believe just like other countries such as Iran or Isreal does."]
Has anyone prevented you from having a 'god' you trust in? Do you live in Satanville, where even the legal system is against you?
To my knowledge Israel is secular (but I may be wrong) and as to using Iran as a good example of anything religous or political, it's ......peculiar?..... maybe.
Quote: ["Really, I'd rather let my kids go to school with People who believe in God;"]
Why? Do you after all don't want them to be able to form their own opinions, which eventually may differ from yours. How could that limit your possibilities of manifesting christian values.
Quote: ["They dont have to believe in My God; but they shouldnt stop me either for freely declaring His Name cause it makes others Ashamed."]
I know a lot of people talking about Buddha, without anyone (except fanatic christians ofcourse), raising an eyebrow. The problem may be, that when some christians start talking about their religion, they become unbearable with all the monopoly-seeking megalomania.
But in any case, your persecution-insinuations have nothing to do with an educational system.
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by 1MrsJesusChrist
You wrote:
["But you Dont Have the Right to Stop Anyone Else from getting what they Want."]
If it interferes with other peoples' lives, it is un-acceptable. Generally it's live and let live on the conditions of egalitarian, liberal, secular democractic principles.
edit on 19-7-2011 by bogomil because: last half sentence added
Originally posted by 1MrsJesusChrist
How is that interferring in other people's lives? If they dont want to be a part of it; they dont have to
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by 1MrsJesusChrist
You wrote:
["But you Dont Have the Right to Stop Anyone Else from getting what they Want."]
If it interferes with other peoples' lives, it is un-acceptable. Generally it's live and let live on the conditions of egalitarian, liberal, secular democractic principles.
edit on 19-7-2011 by bogomil because: last half sentence added
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by Annee
Maybe it would be a good idea to request national flying spaghetti monster holidays. Also here in Europe.
Originally posted by bogomil
But the question of re-introducing religious indoctrination in schools goes beyond its present implications. Next we could be up against a re-defined science, teaching children that computers origine from divine inspiration, and that farmers should pray their crops into growing instead of using whatever available technology and objective knowledge they have (well, it would solve the overpopulation problem, if you don't mind billions dying of starvation).
Theist messing with society and its functions has never been successful, except as considered by theists.
Originally posted by bogomil
Originally posted by 1MrsJesusChrist
How is that interferring in other people's lives? If they dont want to be a part of it; they dont have to
Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by 1MrsJesusChrist
You wrote:
["But you Dont Have the Right to Stop Anyone Else from getting what they Want."]
If it interferes with other peoples' lives, it is un-acceptable. Generally it's live and let live on the conditions of egalitarian, liberal, secular democractic principles.
edit on 19-7-2011 by bogomil because: last half sentence added
I'm afraid, that I am at a loss here. What is the "that" you refer to?