It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No, the taxes need to be raised for the right reasons. The spending needs to stop for the wrong junk. You nailed it with corporate welfare. BUt that's not enough. Sure, we should stop giving them handouts and now they need to start paying for the roads and infrastructure they use (and for the lack of employment they create).
The wars are unsustainable (and immoral, but I guess we're only talking the economic side for now) and they are the biggest money drain at the moment. Not public education, not my nana's social security check, not pensions (that are prenegotiated savings, i.e., the person's money already, not some special bonus) for teachers, not medicare or medicaid or foodstamps. None of that is draining this economy. There is one thing, and one thing only that is draining the funds of this nation, and that is the energy-defense privatization coup that occurred some time before 9/11, but at least became apparent to me after that.
Plus, it's hard to need a lot of jobs to build a road these days with those behemoths that pave stretches of road more efficiently than a team of Hooverville residents.
Go to the grocery stores, automated check out.
Go to the gas station, pump your own.
Call for technical assistance, mostly automated.
Pay your bills, all online.
Manufacturing, all in China.
What do you want people to do to bring home the bacon, exactly?
Originally posted by Sphota
reply to post by korathin
I'm male and I'm an educator. Feminist agenda indeed.
The reason the shovel ready program was useless is because everything is built already. They don't need slave labor, they need highly precise, well-educated professionals who can accurately repair our infrastructure. No more houses need to be built, they need to be occupied.edit on 3-7-2011 by Sphota because: Removing the rude part
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by Sphota
Plus, it's hard to need a lot of jobs to build a road these days with those behemoths that pave stretches of road more efficiently than a team of Hooverville residents.
Go to the grocery stores, automated check out.
Go to the gas station, pump your own.
Call for technical assistance, mostly automated.
Pay your bills, all online.
Manufacturing, all in China.
What do you want people to do to bring home the bacon, exactly?
Ad what is the common denominator in all the above? Technology. We need engineers, technicians, and scientists to maintain our lead in technology. That's how we will bring home the bacon.
The rich, who hire and pay most people are the targets of the proponents and the governmment, because they have more money that can be taken for "free" stuff and useless government programs.
The kicker here is, is that if companies get taxed more, they will defray that additional expediture onto us, by raising the prices of what they provide.
Originally posted by buster2010
I always laugh when I hear people cry about taxes then complain about the bad economy. History shows that when taxes go up the economy goes up. When tax breaks are given the economy goes down. Clinton raised taxes just a little and had a surplus Bush came in office gave out the tax breaks and everything started to go down hill.
Originally posted by mishigas
Exactly. Corporations don't pay taxes. Consumers do. So when people call for higher taxes on the rich, they are volunteering to pick up the tab.
I always laugh when I hear people cry about taxes then complain about the bad economy. History shows that when taxes go up the economy goes up. When tax breaks are given the economy goes down. Clinton raised taxes just a little and had a surplus Bush came in office gave out the tax breaks and everything started to go down hill.
The Looting of U.S. Corporations under Reagan...
The "deregulation" that occurred under Ronald Reagan resulted in the takeover and looting of many cash-rich U.S. corporations through leveraged buyouts involving junk bonds.....
This looting resulted in the loss of many jobs and in the significant reduction of pension benefits. Many corporate pension plans that were well-funded and invested in very safe securities were closed. The proceeds were used to set up new pension plans through the purchase of junk bonds. This scam was permitted by the passage of a law that allowed a pension plan to be closed and a new one established, provided that the new pension plan had the same "expected benefits" as the old plan. Pension actuaries were paid off to attest that this was the case. The sellers of the junk bonds made out like bandits. But when the junk bonds collapsed, many retirees saw their pension benefits reduced significantly--in some cases by more than two-thirds......
Originally posted by macman
Taxes go up and the economy goes with it?
You have been smoking something funny haven't you?
Clinton had a surplus, yes. But, that surplus is not the Govt's money, it is tax money that belongs to the individual it was stolen.....er taken from.