It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dalan.
reply to post by LiveEquation
We could have, 20% countries dedicated to agriculture, and 15% to industry. The rest for habitation etc etc
This is why I hate speculation of this kind.
People have the smug, superior attitudes, where, for whatever reason, they feel they are entitled to make decisions like this for people.
No one has the right to just clear out whole Countries for their flimsy environmental concerns.
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
reply to post by 46ACE
Please provide us a dictionary provided definintion of "liberal" to kick things off...I get tired of faithful listeners of Rush throwing the term around and not even know where it originated from.
Look, it's really quite simple when you think about it. It only makes sense to centralize anything. Nothing is successful if it isn't centralized and sychronized on some level. Otherwise you get what's called a "charlie foxtrot".
No one is saying we will all be forced to wear the same grey suits and drive the same cars, I'm saying the PLANET should come together as one and then we can really get some things done.
Separation is always a tool of evil...it's really quite simple.
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
Originally posted by dalan.
reply to post by LiveEquation
We could have, 20% countries dedicated to agriculture, and 15% to industry. The rest for habitation etc etc
This is why I hate speculation of this kind.
People have the smug, superior attitudes, where, for whatever reason, they feel they are entitled to make decisions like this for people.
No one has the right to just clear out whole Countries for their flimsy environmental concerns.
You're right, "no ONE" has the right, but it is within the rights of a MAJORITY of us. If the majority of society finally uses their brain and say everyone will live in North and South America, Afrika will be strictly for wildlife, Europe and Asia for agriculture, etc, that would be smart.
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
reply to post by 46ACE
Please provide us a dictionary provided definintion of "liberal" to kick things off...I get tired of faithful listeners of Rush throwing the term around and not even know where it originated from.
Look, it's really quite simple when you think about it. It only makes sense to centralize anything. Nothing is successful if it isn't centralized and sychronized on some level. Otherwise you get what's called a "charlie foxtrot".
No one is saying we will all be forced to wear the same grey suits and drive the same cars, I'm saying the PLANET should come together as one and then we can really get some things done.
Separation is always a tool of evil...it's really quite simple.
You can "come together now".Its just not possible.
You just want the power to force people you don't know to : "evacuate(i.e."abandon") whole countries"?
"Rush listeners" ha!
I'm sure
I've carried this definition since well before you were born; definition:"liberal"
Advocating: redistribution of wealth, An all encompassing perceived superiority hence the personal authority( no: "duty") to protect people from themselves. Concern over appearances or perceptions of others over substance.
"No one one is saying it" except:" U.n. Agenda21".:
Where humans are to be racked and stacked in designated "habitation zones".(.a.k. a.. "ghettos")( Some "mustache wearing Aryan guy in tall boots tried that once about 60 years ago!).
edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
Originally posted by dalan.
reply to post by LiveEquation
We could have, 20% countries dedicated to agriculture, and 15% to industry. The rest for habitation etc etc
This is why I hate speculation of this kind.
People have the smug, superior attitudes, where, for whatever reason, they feel they are entitled to make decisions like this for people.
No one has the right to just clear out whole Countries for their flimsy environmental concerns.
You're right, "no ONE" has the right, but it is within the rights of a MAJORITY of us. If the majority of society finally uses their brain and say everyone will live in North and South America, Afrika will be strictly for wildlife, Europe and Asia for agriculture, etc, that would be smart.
"disbelieving rant continues:"
Another advocate of "Mob" rule...I don't think it would be "smart" at all..and I "love" animals too.
How do you think the Greeks will react to being told to "pack your your chit and move to Bolivia"?What about the Bolivians who are being forced to give up valuable land to some world police"cocamamie scheme"?
Will they think it "smart" eliminating their way of life? Do you know any Greeks, or Italians or Slovenians? serbs?Turks? Of course not. Just numbers to be relocated and managed... one world Facists.!
You people are terribly misguided here; and Ican't convince anybody.So my time is better spent mounting the new laser to my tactical shotgun. See ya' around the playground
kiddies: "blue berets are "it!"
"BANG"edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
Originally posted by dalan.
reply to post by LiveEquation
We could have, 20% countries dedicated to agriculture, and 15% to industry. The rest for habitation etc etc
This is why I hate speculation of this kind.
People have the smug, superior attitudes, where, for whatever reason, they feel they are entitled to make decisions like this for people.
No one has the right to just clear out whole Countries for their flimsy environmental concerns.
You're right, "no ONE" has the right, but it is within the rights of a MAJORITY of us. If the majority of society finally uses their brain and say everyone will live in North and South America, Afrika will be strictly for wildlife, Europe and Asia for agriculture, etc, that would be smart.
"disbelieving rant continues:"
Another advocate of "Mob" rule...I don't think it would be "smart" at all..and I "love" animals too.
How do you think the Greeks will react to being told to "pack your your chit and move to Bolivia"?What about the Bolivians who are being forced to give up valuable land to some world police"cocamamie scheme"?
Will they think it "smart" eliminating their way of life? Do you know any Greeks, or Italians or Slovenians? serbs?Turks? Of course not. Just numbers to be relocated and managed... one world Facists.!
You people are terribly misguided here; and Ican't convince anybody.So my time is better spent mounting the new laser to my tactical shotgun. See ya' around the playground
kiddies: "blue berets are "it!"
"BANG"edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)edit on 27-6-2011 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)
I'll kill your argument with this simple thing. I'll take the relocation agenda from my perspective.
We are now a One World and the decision is made that Florida (where) is now restricted for agriculture. So I have to move....well no big deal, I'll move. Long as my expenses are taken care of, I'm not a vampire and has to sleep in the soil of my native land, I guess I'll be living in Japan now.
See how easy that is, and how I don't need my laser to shoot soldiers?
Originally posted by 46ACE
Some of us (and not only Americans) would ask:" Who the hell are you to be making decisions like that for me?"
Originally posted by daskakik
Originally posted by 46ACE
Some of us (and not only Americans) would ask:" Who the hell are you to be making decisions like that for me?"
Like all those people who chose to stay put during Katrina and then needed to be rescued?
Sadly sometimes people need to be proded like cattle to do what is in their best interest.
Originally posted by 46ACE
There its out: don't you feel bettter now? You don't love your fellowman:
you think he's too stupid for his own good.
But You on the other hand are blessed with that infallible insight to know whats best!
Originally posted by 46ACE
So long and thanks for all the insults...
Everyone pay attention to the statement below his username and recall what I proclaim.
Separation is a tool of the evil...
You're right, "no ONE" has the right, but it is within the rights of a MAJORITY of us. If the majority of society finally uses their brain and say everyone will live in North and South America, Afrika will be strictly for wildlife, Europe and Asia for agriculture, etc, that would be smart.
A democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner, in a republic, the sheep has a gun.-Benjamin Franklin
Originally posted by letscit
reply to post by dalan.
s&f for you very well done. i would also like to add it is why the U.S. was setup for the states to control themselves. problem is the fed keeps over riding the states and we are getting into more of a mess with the stripping of the states rights for the feds rights.
Originally posted by dalan.
There is a reason why certain philosophers claimed that local control is key to happiness during the enlightenment. Its much easier for a town to make a decision than it is for a County, than it is for a State, than it is for a Country..etc...etc.
Originally posted by dalan.
There is a reason why certain philosophers claimed that local control is key to happiness during the enlightenment. Its much easier for a town to make a decision than it is for a County, than it is for a State, than it is for a Country..etc...etc.
Those philosophers are wrong. The idea of local control seems wise until you start observation things in the lab or in the hospital. Lets start with this analogy: say anatomy
If each of your muscles and organs were independently controlled locally...errr, that would be a recipe for disaster. We call that disease. You have a brain, a nervous system for a reason. Without this control system, you have a system wide malfunction leading to death since one cannot breath without the ANS ( a type of Nervous System)
From a living cell to a full organism, there is a main control system. The same should apply in our society if we are to have harmony. Local control systems need to be kept in check by a more "sophisticated system-wide" control system.
Here is an example below of a system-wide control system
A one world order is even evident in our bodies
The reason why even local control systems do not work in our societies is due to differences in beliefs
Originally posted by LiveEquation
reply to post by Illusionsaregrander
History disagrees with you. So i have "umarked your words"
I don't see how you can think it is impossible to have one world government. Your body does it, why is it impossible? a single cell in your body probably thinks the same way like you because it doesn't see the big picture.