It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sirnex
You are confusing the sensation for the perception.
The biological processes create the experience but not that which experiences.
OK, describe the difference between the experience of pain and the perception of pain. Should be a fun thing.
Originally posted by sirnex
The brain is the receiver.
Really? Exactly how does it "receive" consciousness? Where does it come from? How is it transmitted?
Originally posted by sirnex
Really now? Can we just be the slightest bit honest here instead of emptily and arbitrarily exclaiming utter baseless garbage?
Originally posted by EthanT
No, we don't. We don't even have a viable model on how consciousness works, let alone evidence to back that model up.
Originally posted by Jezus
Originally posted by EthanT
No, we don't. We don't even have a viable model on how consciousness works, let alone evidence to back that model up.
You can not scientifically prove to anyone that you have consciousness.
You can not scientifically prove to yourself that anyone else has consciousness.
The experience of pain is created by the transmission of information from the external world to the brain.
The perception of pain is an abstract concept to describe our consciousness responding to this information.
Your questions are interesting but unnecessary to comprehend that consciousness is not a byproduct of synthesizing information.
Consciousness is just an abstract concept.
Dude, you're the one who keeps brining up "wishful thinking", God, immaterial consciousness, etc. Not me.
Not according to sirnex
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by Jezus
The experience of pain is created by the transmission of information from the external world to the brain.
The perception of pain is an abstract concept to describe our consciousness responding to this information.
Right... the abstract aspect being the language to describe the physical component of that which is being described.
Originally posted by sirnex
Your questions are interesting but unnecessary to comprehend that consciousness is not a byproduct of synthesizing information.
Cop out.
You laugh, but it's still baseless arbitrary garbage being claimed.
Originally posted by sirnex
Consciousness is just an abstract concept.
Are we using the same definition of consciousness? I was unaware that awareness was just an abstract quality.
I suppose my unawareness was just abstract too.
The feeling of pain is not in any way a "physical component" it is a subjective experience and an abstract concept itself.
It is the unavoidable logical conclusion of comprehending consciousness.
The idea that the mind is a byproduct of the brain synthesizing information is "baseless arbitrary garbage"
Of course awareness is an abstract concept too.
Awareness and consciousness are the most basic examples of what abstract concept means.
Originally posted by sirnex
Oh, so your a doctor and know a bit about neuroscience now? I was unaware that there was no physical aspect of pain at all and that it was just all subjective and abstract. Damn we're a bunch of babies!
Originally posted by sirnex
Originally posted by Jezus
Awareness and consciousness are the most basic examples of what abstract concept means.
You should try and get a paper published Dr. Jezus! You can post your scientific research, experiments and results and really wow the world over! Oh right... Arbitrary. Forgot about that word for a second.
My formal education was focused on physiological psychology.
But again you are confusing the sensation for the perception.
The physical aspect of pain is the transmission of information from the external world to the brain.
This biological processes create the experience but not that which experiences
The perception or feeling of pain is an abstract concept to describe our consciousness responding to this information.
You seem to be having trouble with the concept of abstract concept...I can understand why because it is in and of itself an abstract concept.
Originally posted by sirnex
Based upon what? Your arbitrarily assumed garbage? There is nothing to indicate that there is a non-physical component of 'experience'. Having language to define a sensation (or if you've gotten a hold of that dictionary/thesaurus yet, perception) is the only abstract thing occurring. The physical component is still the same regardless of what it's called. There is nothing abstract about it.
If that were the case, then simply ignoring hunger, pain, disease, etc should make it all go away. Since it's not ABSTRACT (again learn your words and language usage, it's important), these things exist caused by physical causes with physical consequences. There simply is no way around it and no other verified alternative to it. Abstract arbitrary wishful thinking is simply not how reality operates, and certainly hasn't before our species grew to be the abstract thinking narcissists we are. Right, I just said you're not special.
Originally posted by sirnex
Please for the love of god learn English and how to use words properly. Yes, abstract as itself is.... well abstract. So is our language that defines that particular grouping of sounds and symbols that make up that word. Or any word for that matter! It's all abstract. What's not abstract is the sensation (Have you figured out it's another word for perception yet?) of me punching you in the throat. Hey, you can ignore it and call it abstract if you want. Mind over matter right? LMFAO!
The physical causations of experience do not equal experience itself. How hard is that to understand?
Pain is a subjective, internal experience. There is no scientific way to measure or quantify this. Looking at behavioral reactions to pain tells you how a person reacts to it, sure, but it tells you nothing about what it feels like to actually experience that pain.
Consciousness does not even exist according to deterministic science. Pain doesn't exist. Love doesn't exist. Any form of qualia don't exist. I can't prove to you that I'm conscious, and you can't prove to me that you're conscious.
All I see from you is consistent ad hominem attacks that purposely evade the topic being discussed in this thread. Obviously there is something about this topic that offends you deeply or else you wouldn't be so hostile in your posting.
Uh, I'm pretty sure you're the only one that doesn't understand what abstract means.
Prove to me that you experience pain when you "get punched in the throat." Seriously, prove it. You can't measure it with objective means, so for all I know it doesn't even exist.
If you're a human, you know that pain exists, even if you can't prove it. It's subjective, internal, and unquantifiable.
Originally posted by Ghost375
As someone who has studied the brain extensively (I have a degree in psych.), people who say there isn't something else there are basically holding their ears and saying lalalalala. It's funny the people who say everything is determinism get upset when you mention the word fate. Determinism=fate, the only difference is fate has some magical association that really upsets 'unbelievers.'
Ask someone who believes in determinism, "so you believe in fate?"edit on 26-6-2011 by Ghost375 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Ghost375
As someone who has studied the brain extensively (I have a degree in psych.), people who say there isn't something else there are basically holding their ears and saying lalalalala.
Originally posted by sirnex
reply to post by AlphaZero
The physical causations of experience do not equal experience itself. How hard is that to understand?
I did not state that the physical causation is equal to the language created to define the physical aspect of pain. Now how hard is that to understand?
So you don't believe in basic physiology and the nervous system? Hell, might as well not even bother with the fact that the body reacts before we even say "ouch".
I agree, if we solely use your arbitrarily assumed mechanism of how self-awareness works. We can't prove any of those things because under your mode of operation, we apparently can't even test for those things. That being why you and your ilk have yet to provide any evidence for these arbitrary assumptions born from your dislike of physical science not jumping at the snap of your finger to explain everything under the sun the minute you have a question.
Thankfully though, science can explain the hormonal responses we call emotions or the "qualia" of pain and similar sensations (also known as perceptions, if you own a thesaurus).
The only thing I dislike about these type of topics is the lack of cognitive usage in the proponents who attack the current limitation of scientific knowledge. Personally I would not like to see a repeat of the Christian Dark Ages because some moron wants to create a new falsehood and attempt to get it accepted by gullible morons who can't be bothered to understand that science isn't about having every g theories and ideas we have about our universe and thing's within it. Science is about patience and being humble until you actually know something is true before you mind numbingly chant in your little church of moronicy hoping others believe in your made up garbage that you continuously pussy foot around proving is actually true. Just saying
I'm sorry, but we can indeed measure the physical condition we call pain. It's a very physical thing with very physical causes and effects upon our bodies. Unless you're against biology as well.
A philosophical zombie or p-zombie in the philosophy of mind and perception is a hypothetical being that is indistinguishable from a normal human being except in that it lacks conscious experience, qualia, or sentience.[1] When a zombie is poked with a sharp object, for example, it does not feel any pain though it behaves exactly as if it does feel pain (it may say "ouch" and recoil from the stimulus, or tell us that it is in intense pain).
If your a smart scientific human, you know this statement to be utter bullcrap.
Originally posted by sirnex
The physical aspect of pain is the transmission of information from the external world to the brain.
This biological processes create the experience but not that which experiences
Based upon what?
Originally posted by sirnex
There is nothing to indicate that there is a non-physical component of 'experience'.
Originally posted by sirnex
Having language to define a sensation (or if you've gotten a hold of that dictionary/thesaurus yet, perception) is the only abstract thing occurring. The physical component is still the same regardless of what it's called. There is nothing abstract about it.
Originally posted by sirnex
If that were the case, then simply ignoring hunger, pain, disease, etc should make it all go away. Since it's not ABSTRACT (again learn your words and language usage, it's important), these things exist caused by physical causes with physical consequences. There simply is no way around it and no other verified alternative to it. Abstract arbitrary wishful thinking is simply not how reality operates, and certainly hasn't before our species grew to be the abstract thinking narcissists we are. Right, I just said you're not special.
Originally posted by sirnex
Please for the love of god learn English and how to use words properly. Yes, abstract as itself is.... well abstract. So is our language that defines that particular grouping of sounds and symbols that make up that word. Or any word for that matter! It's all abstract. What's not abstract is the sensation (Have you figured out it's another word for perception yet?) of me punching you in the throat. Hey, you can ignore it and call it abstract if you want. Mind over matter right? LMFAO!
Originally posted by ExistentialNightmare
a person's choices merely appear in his mental stream as if sprung from the void.
Originally posted by ExistentialNightmare
Also, where's your avatar gone!? I liked it.