It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vapor
i've said it before, and i'll say it again. we need a new voting system. the way we vote is one of the worst ways ever invented.
i believe stalin said something to the effect it doesn't matter who you let vote or how many, it's how you count the votes that matters.
Originally posted by mrmulder
Originally posted by vapor
i've said it before, and i'll say it again. we need a new voting system. the way we vote is one of the worst ways ever invented.
i believe stalin said something to the effect it doesn't matter who you let vote or how many, it's how you count the votes that matters.
Let's just hope we don't switch to the electronic voting system in this next election. That would be disasterous. We need to stick to the paper ballot.
Originally posted by groingrinder
Originally posted by mrmulder
Originally posted by vapor
i've said it before, and i'll say it again. we need a new voting system. the way we vote is one of the worst ways ever invented.
i believe stalin said something to the effect it doesn't matter who you let vote or how many, it's how you count the votes that matters.
Let's just hope we don't switch to the electronic voting system in this next election. That would be disasterous. We need to stick to the paper ballot.
I agree completely. When the largest maker of these machines also gives to one of the candidates(BUSH), then the fox is in the henhouse. No offense meant Mr. Mulder.
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
So join the party that most closely resembles your personal political attitudes and try to change it from within.
Originally posted by RANT
We should definiately return to our founding fathers intent of a ONE PARTY system where the heir apparent, then King George, runs unopposed as long as he likes repaying loyalty with copious quantities of alcohol until ready to pass the gauntlet to the next guy he chooses.
Revolution for the sake of revolution!
Originally posted by Amuk
Originally posted by RANT
We should definiately return to our founding fathers intent of a ONE PARTY system where the heir apparent, then King George, runs unopposed as long as he likes repaying loyalty with copious quantities of alcohol until ready to pass the gauntlet to the next guy he chooses.
Revolution for the sake of revolution!
Who said that?
Originally posted by Amuk
Are you saying that every question has only TWO possible answers?