It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Annee
Buck Up Macho Man - - you are 50% responsible for the act and any results of.
No, if the man does not want the baby, then the woman is 100 % responsible for the result, by her own unilateral decision. Why should man be forced to pay anything, then?
Originally posted by Annee
Doing it the old fashion way - - which requires both partners. Buck Up Macho Man - - you are 50% responsible for the act and any results of.
Deal with it.
Originally posted by Annee
Anyone besides me get tired of hearing about the feminist agenda.
MAN went to war - - left women to fend for themselves. Guess what - - the women did just fine without you.
MAN comes home - - expects woman to revert back to subservient.
Are you out of your mind?
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Annee
Fact is: MAN is responsible for women becoming independent.
If women were truly independent, they would also bear full responsibility for their own unilateral decision to bring a child into this world, and not leech money from men that did not agree with it in the first place.
If a woman chose to have a baby by herself through AI - - I agree.
Doing it the old fashion way - - which requires both partners. Buck Up Macho Man - - you are 50% responsible for the act and any results of.
Deal with it.
Originally posted by CobraCommander
She did choose to by herself, that's the point. It's her choice, not the man's. And don't say that the man made the choice when he had sex because if that's the case, then so did the woman and abortion should be outlawed.
Originally posted by CobraCommander
Fine, you go get your ass shot off in some far away land, I'll stay home with the kids.
Originally posted by SevenBeans
Originally posted by Annee
Doing it the old fashion way - - which requires both partners. Buck Up Macho Man - - you are 50% responsible for the act and any results of.
Deal with it.
Are you being dense on purpose?
A baby that requires 20 years of support does not result from intercourse, it is only ever the result of a woman's unilateral choice.
YOU need to BUCK UP - you are 100% responsible for the results of your unilateral choices!
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by CobraCommander
She did choose to by herself, that's the point. It's her choice, not the man's. And don't say that the man made the choice when he had sex because if that's the case, then so did the woman and abortion should be outlawed.
I'm really tired of your Poor Me whining.
She chose by herself to have intercourse that can result in a pregnancy? Sure she did.
Or is it immaculate conception?
Oh Gawd! Another man giving his opinion on abortion. Sorry not interested.
Originally posted by sonnny1
I would love to see more women step up and say they dont "need" financial help from the man,or ask a judge why do women get placement of the children 9 out of 10 times. You will NEVER see that,but you will always hear how hard it is for a man to financially fight a corrupt system,that is gender biased.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by CobraCommander
Fine, you go get your ass shot off in some far away land, I'll stay home with the kids.
And where exactly did I mention anything along these lines?
Where someone's feet touch the ground when they are born - - is not my measure of human value.
Originally posted by CobraCommander
The only people here with the "poor me" mentality are the women who whine about how they can't afford a kid THEY chose to have.
And I know you don't want to hear it, because you are biased and unwilling to accept that your position is one of hypocrisy.
Originally posted by Annee
The minute your zipper went down - - you became 50% responsible.
That's called biology.
Originally posted by CobraCommander
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by CobraCommander
Fine, you go get your ass shot off in some far away land, I'll stay home with the kids.
And where exactly did I mention anything along these lines?
Where someone's feet touch the ground when they are born - - is not my measure of human value.
You said women did just fine while men went off to war. So, like I said, let's have the women march off to war and the men can stay home for a change.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by CobraCommander
The only people here with the "poor me" mentality are the women who whine about how they can't afford a kid THEY chose to have.
And I know you don't want to hear it, because you are biased and unwilling to accept that your position is one of hypocrisy.
Again - - unless the woman - independently - by herself - went to a clinic and had AI. Which some women do.
There was a willing partner in creating a child. That is just FACT.
Originally posted by Annee
Someone must have really done a number on you.
You do know - of course - women have to get men's permission to fight in wars. It is still men making the military rules.
Originally posted by CobraCommander
Yes, some women do, and STILL there have been cases where the donor was forced to pay support.
Originally posted by CobraCommander
Originally posted by Annee
Someone must have really done a number on you.
You do know - of course - women have to get men's permission to fight in wars. It is still men making the military rules.
There are plenty of women in Congress, write your senator if you don't like the rules of the military.
I for one really don't care who goes to war, but mixed gender units lack cohesion. As do mixed gender-preference units.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by CobraCommander
Yes, some women do, and STILL there have been cases where the donor was forced to pay support.
Yes I have heard of a few cases. Some were arranged on their own with no legal paper work.
But - yes I think there has been cases of AI through legal clinics - - - that the donor was help responsible - - - in the best interest of the child. Of course I do not know the details of any cases.
I agree 100% with you on this. If a woman goes to a legitimate licensed clinic - - the donor should be 100% protected.
But - - that is not what you are really talking about.
edit on 11-6-2011 by Annee because: (no reason given)