posted on May, 9 2011 @ 05:25 PM
reply to post by matadoor
What seems backward to me is; Barack Obama claimed they would not reveal evidence, because they wished to remain civilised - They didn't want to
promote the image as a trophy".
If they didn't want to cause incredible lashbacks from Osama's supporters world-wide, if they didn't want to create rage towards the U.S.....
....why did they even bother mentioning it?
To please the public? Should the U.S people be happy about revenge? Uncivilised, unlawful?
If the U.S and the "Western World" are so civilised surely the U.S should have been able to bring him back alive? Surely, THAT would be the civilised
thing to do? And try him under a proper procedures? Or at least keep it quiet....
I'd like to get some other people's point of view because i'm from the United Kingdom so perhaps i don't have the best idea of what's going on.
In essence, i agree with the OP...
edit on 9/5/11 by awake_and_aware because: (no reason given)
edit on 9/5/11 by
awake_and_aware because: (no reason given)