It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Browser/Computer Properties
Browser (User-Agent): Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C)
Time and Date: 2:57:05 PM - Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Javascript: Enabled
Cookies Enabled: Enabled
Java Enabled: Enabled
CPU class/type: OS/CPU Windows NT 6.0
Screen Width x Height: 1920 x 1080
Screen Color Depth: 24
Window Width: 571 (29.7% of 1920)
Window Height: 353 (32.7% of 1080)
Browser Headers
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Connection: keep-alive
Originally posted by BecauseiSaidso
reply to post by Chakotay
So are you able click on the ballons and see there screen per the screen shots? If not and your curious about a city ill pull it for you....
Originally posted by 00nunya00
You need to account for solar flares and space-based radiation fluctuations to prove it's Earth-based radiation. Otherwise, it's just you saying "trust me" and isn't that exactly what everyone's criticizing the EPA for saying?
Originally posted by Chakotay
Personally, I think the EPA's actions are deliberate, and reprehensible.
Thoughts?
Originally posted by 00nunya00
reply to post by muzzleflash
Well, totally, we've polluted the Earth with fallout for a long time to come----not in debate. Doing things like digging in/around the areas in NV where they did nuclear tests will definitely spike those levels. But that's what I'm saying----when we bring in the fact that there are varying levels of all kinds, from solar flares (which will affect different places depending on how the geomagnetic field is reacting to it), to digging in radioactive areas, it becomes clear that it's going to take a lot of comparison to be able to say "Japan is significantly adding to these levels"; you have to be able to account for the already-present varying levels of radioactivity. And that takes a lot of past data to determine.
That's my only point.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by Chakotay
Personally, I think the EPA's actions are deliberate, and reprehensible.
Thoughts?
I think you would correct
in that assumption.
They lied after 9/11
why wouldn't they lie now?
The Environmental Protection Agency lied about 9/11? You learn something new every day on ATS...
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by Chakotay
Personally, I think the EPA's actions are deliberate, and reprehensible.
Thoughts?
I think you would correct
in that assumption.
They lied after 9/11
why wouldn't they lie now?
NEW YORK -- In the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the World Trade Center, the White House instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to give the public misleading information, telling New Yorkers it was safe to breathe when reliable information on air quality was not available.
That finding is included in a report released Friday by the Office of the Inspector General of the EPA. It noted that some of the agency's news releases in the weeks after the attack were softened before being released to the public: Reassuring information was added, while cautionary information was deleted.
"When the EPA made a September 18 announcement that the air was 'safe' to breathe, it did not have sufficient data and analyses to make such a blanket statement," the report says. "Furthermore, the White House Council on Environmental Quality influenced . . . the information that EPA communicated to the public through its early press releases when it convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones."