It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Daughter2
reply to post by Subjective Truth
Show me the law which states a member HAS to vote.
Show me the law which prevents them from leaving the State.
You can't show me because there isn't a specific statute. Of course members have the right not to vote and the right to leave the State!
What you are saying is in your opinon, you don't think they doing what they are supposed to be doing.
Well in my opinion, as soon as Walker accepted the vacation from who he thought was a rich supporter, Walker ceased doing his job.
Let's leave the opinion on whether someone is doing their job up to the voters.
Originally posted by Daughter2
reply to post by Subjective Truth
What I am saying let the voters decide what it means to do their job.
Good, then corporations by your thinking should not be allowed to "sway" voters with contributions to elections. I can get on that one. No corporate money, no union money.
Agreed,Mindspin,This is a perfect example of the sports-team mindset that both parties use to keep the people under control.Neither side cares has long as they think their team is "wining."
Originally posted by MindSpin
reply to post by Whereweheaded
E
They can punish them all they want.
My issue is them using the state police as their own personal guard to push through the legislation they want.
I seem to remember a lot of people upset about the health care bill because despite all the protests...the government passed the bill anyway.
The capital of Wisconsin is FULL of protestors...for weeks now...and yet people who were hell bent against the health care bill being passed because it "went against the will of the people" are fine with ramming this through.
Absolutely wonderfuly hypocritical.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by bphi1908
Their job is to represent their districts. Their districts oppose this bill. The people pushing this bill are not allowing discussion - they're barely allowing voting. Those pushing the bill have enough of a majority that even if all the Democrats voted no or abstained, the bill would pass. Thus, if the Democrats were to come back and either vote no or just stand around picking their noses, their constituencies' desires would not be represented in any fashion.
That is, if the Democrats voted, they would not be doing their job.
It seems counter-intuitive until you realize that their responsibility is to the people who hired them; their districts. if being out of state to prevent a vote is what it takes to protect the interests of their constituents, then hthat's what they're going to do, because that is their job.
Originally posted by St Udio
reply to post by MindSpin
the US Military has a provision to prosecute members who go AWOL, (absent-without-leave)
the State Legislature Democrats had also taken an Oath to perform the duties of their office,
If they chose to run away & hide out to avoid their duty (deliberating & voting) they need to be
extradited to their State Capitol, and/ or deemed so mentally unbalanced so as to not be able
to do the duties of the office they hold --- i.e. Impeached and removed from their position.
Originally posted by St Udio
If they chose to run away & hide out to avoid their duty (deliberating & voting) they need to be
extradited to their State Capitol, and/ or deemed so mentally unbalanced so as to not be able
to do the duties of the office they hold --- i.e. Impeached and removed from their position.
13.05 Logrolling prohibited. Any member of the legislature who gives, offers or promises to give his or her vote or influence in favor of or against any measure or proposition pending or proposed to be introduced in the legislature in consideration or upon condition that any other person elected to the same legislature will give or will promise or agree to give his or her vote or influence in favor of or against any other measure or proposition pending or proposed to be introduced in such legislature, or who gives, offers or promises to give his or her vote or influence for or against any measure on condition that any other member will give his or her vote or influence in favor of any change in any other bill pending or proposed to be introduced in the legislature, is guilty of a Class I felony.
13.19 Arrest of officers. No officer of the senate or assembly, while in actual attendance upon the duties of that person's office, shall be liable to arrest on civil process.
(1) Each house may punish as a contempt, by imprisonment, a breach of its privileges or the privileges of its members; but only for one or more of the following offenses:
13.26(1)(a)
(a) Arresting a member or officer of the house, or procuring such member or officer to be arrested in violation of the member's privilege from arrest.
13.26(1)(b)
(b) Disorderly conduct in the immediate view of either house or of any committee thereof and directly tending to interrupt its proceedings.
13.26(1)(c)
(c) Refusing to attend or be examined as a witness, either before the house or a committee, or before any person authorized to take testimony in legislative proceedings, or to produce any books, records, documents, papers or keys according to the exigency of any subpoena.
13.26(1)(d)
(d) Giving or offering a bribe to a member, or attempting by menace or other corrupt means or device to control or influence a member's vote or to prevent the member from voting.
13.26(2)
(2) The term of imprisonment a house may impose under this section shall not extend beyond the same session of the legislature.