It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by budaruskie
reply to post by agentblue
There was a time in America where the gov't was expected to abide by its own laws. That is clearly no longer the case. What are you going to do about it?
Originally posted by agentblue
reply to post by whatukno
Apparently you didn't understand my point. My point is that child porn is wrong and do not condone the actions in the slightest bit. What I am against and suggesting is the reusing of these pics on another website regardless of who is doing it. If they repost them then the FBI are the publishers. I should say that two wrongs don't make a right and by them re engaging the the pics on the internet is further endangering the childs safety and forcing them to more extreme forms of public scrutiny by allowing it back on the web for others to view.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by agentblue
But the only people who WANT to view this material are people who are into kiddie porn. Don't you think that these people need to be found out for who they are and taken out of society?
Oh but I see, because the government is actually doing something about these sickos it must be wrong.
Do you expect them to fight crime by not doing anything?edit on 3/2/2011 by whatukno because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by whatukno
But the only people who WANT to view this material are people who are into kiddie porn. Don't you think that these people need to be found out for who they are and taken out of society?
Originally posted by JohnnyTHSeed
Originally posted by whatukno
I don't disagree with outlawing child porn, but the producers and pushers should be the main targets of the FBI. However, it is bad policy to target yourself.
It took me a minute to decipher the first part but after i figured out exactly what you said, I found the last part quite ironic and funny assuming that you meant that it is bad policy to target yourself meaning the FBIedit on 2-3-2011 by agentblue because: needed clarification
Originally posted by agentblue
reply to post by James1982
Thank you James 1982 for seeing my point exactly as I intended it to be read.
Originally posted by agentblue
reply to post by James1982
James1982 I was thinking and wondering how they thought I was defending any child porn producing or anything of that remote matter. Maybe they are just skimming and only reading what they want to hear????
they are fueling the people and goading people into these actions
Originally posted by whatukno
Nevermind this is obviously just one of those NAMBLA defending threads made by people who think that child porn is ok and that finding people who use child porn or investigating crimes in this country is somehow wrong. I think it's sick, I think that getting people who trade in child pornography off the streets is a good thing but obviously my attitude is the minority in this thread. Seems like the majority in this thread think that it's just fine for these sickos to be watching this stuff and trading this stuff and they don't think that law enforcement should do anything about it.